XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

V12 95mm Liners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2020 | 02:43 PM
  #61  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

Ron why would you change engines on a 4600+ pound car that is up to 45 years old?

If speed is your goal put that engine in a light small car.

I can see upgrading the engine for track work. Or as a tribute car etc.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2020 | 04:05 PM
  #62  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Originally Posted by Mguar
Ron why would you change engines on a 4600+ pound car that is up to 45 years old?

If speed is your goal put that engine in a light small car.

I can see upgrading the engine for track work. Or as a tribute car etc.
!!

good point MG , maybe better to put a GM Ecotec into a Crosley HOT SHOT roadster, they weigh around 1800 lbs factory stock!
had one around 1952/53, cute but gutless 1500CC. swapped it for a Triumph 650 T bird motorcycle, NICE!
ron
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2020 | 10:59 AM
  #63  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

That engine is in a MGB that runs Autocross. He started out with a Jaguar V12, well go over to GRM ( Grass RootsMotorsports ) and follow the story. I wish I could figure how to put a link here.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2020 | 12:05 PM
  #64  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

you mention Grass roots motorsprts,, the Owners of that magazine and company , are personal friends of mine, known them for over 25yrs! Daytona/holly hill FL.
fact is when i had my engine business in Holly hill, around 2003, they came by shop and were on a vehicle review test, some GM SUV thing, showed the small engine!
i said that engine is gonna be one of these best hi performance engines yet! ECOTEC!
ron
 

Last edited by ronbros; Jan 22, 2020 at 12:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2020 | 01:34 PM
  #65  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

I hope you get a chance to read the story. Excellent read. It’s a MGB GT with a Jaguar V12
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2020 | 01:27 PM
  #66  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

i'll bet an MGB with a GM ECOTEC , would blow it away!
fact is GM has a book with all the details on how to make 750hp from one of that engine!
and it could be done with an automatic trans, with 4 speeds , they did have a car built that way, but a lot of guys were screaming "unfair advantage)!
ron
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2020 | 01:29 PM
  #67  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

"and the BEAT goes on"
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2020 | 10:18 PM
  #68  
Pawsnclaws's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 66
Likes: 28
From: Denton, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Mguar
If you want the feeling of much better performance you’ll have to change 2 things. The rear end to a post body restyling rear end with the outboard brakes, Not for sake of the brakes, ( although they are much better and far easier to work on),but because instead of your 2.88-1 rear end ratio you will have a 3,54-1 which you need for the next change. Dump the automatic. Sorry, you need a clutch pedal because you’re going for the 5 or 6 speed gearbox.
Then pull your ECU out and send it to AJ6 engineering. Tell them you’re going manual.
The only other thing you can do inexpensively is get the car lighter. Stock it weighs nearly 2 & 1/2 tons! In stock configuration you could make another 100 horsepower and barely feel it!!!
I not interested in much better performance at this time. I'm interested in getting the car back on the road, at minimal cost, given the availability of pistons/liners (fading fast here in the USA) for the busted HE V12 under the hood. Yes, I know it's probably scrap time, or LS1 time, but in the best of all possible worlds the V12 can be refurbished without spending more on parts and machining than the car is worth. If I wanted a Chevy V8, I would've, and could've, bought a Camaro.

 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2020 | 06:23 PM
  #69  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Pawn , its just the reality of life!!
live life untill you die!
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2020 | 06:34 PM
  #70  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

HEY MG ,youtube, SHELBY GT 500,5.8L ,CNC head porting!
it will show how far behind we are,as most on this site(not to be silly).
i'm in process of really taking an expanded view of the lovely Jag V12 , mine included!
way back after doing many performance mods , i was not impressed with performance!
my yardstick was my 1992 Camaro ,with 467" BBC engine, the same mods done to the Jag did not make much final power!
i was dissapointed , an EXOTIC all aluminum block & heads ,V12 , left me cold!
ron
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2020 | 01:08 PM
  #71  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

Originally Posted by S10an
The HE is giving higher efficiency so I guess you get more power back for the amount of fuel.
more flow won't matter much if you don't get burned gasses out. If the air in the overlapping stages only pass directly between the valves some exhaust gasses are left effectively preventing the cylinder from filling with a mix that can be compared. If 5% of the combusted gasses are left 4% extra flow won't help. I guess knowing this for sure is trough simulation and everything else is just observations and experience with a bit of guesswork.
HE does not stand for High Efficiency. It means Help Emissions.

California was about to come out with a tough new law to deal with the Heavy smog they had. Since California accounts for over 50% of Jaguars production and Sir Lyons had spent massively to get the tooling required to build its new V12, plus introduce its new models. Jaguar simply had to clean up the engine.
By patterning Jaguars combustion chamber after the Chevy Fireball head emissions were reduced enough and as a side benefit part throttle fuel economy was improved.
The trade off worked. Added with other changes, driven gently a V12 powered car went from approximately 10 mpg to 17-18 mpg
The real cost was in power potential. It was pretty straight forward on the earlier head to make a lot of power. Not at all on the HE head.

 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2020 | 01:20 PM
  #72  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
HEY MG ,youtube, SHELBY GT 500,5.8L ,CNC head porting!
it will show how far behind we are,as most on this site(not to be silly).
i'm in process of really taking an expanded view of the lovely Jag V12 , mine included!
way back after doing many performance mods , i was not impressed with performance!
my yardstick was my 1992 Camaro ,with 467" BBC engine, the same mods done to the Jag did not make much final power!
i was dissapointed , an EXOTIC all aluminum block & heads ,V12 , left me cold!
ron
The Camaro was a lot lighter than a Jag and not
Burdened with such a tall final drive. Beside Sir Lyons never wanted a drag racer. His goal always was a smooth torquey luxury cruiser. A Bentley type car.
Look at the lift and duration specs on a Chevy compared to a Jag. I’m not saying new designs aren’t an improvement but don’t forget that V12 was first designed back in 1954 and then modified just before production in the late 60’s to go out to 500 cu in. While still using some of the machinery he bought in the WW2 period.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2020 | 01:11 PM
  #73  
DaimlerMK2's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 346
Likes: 58
From: GRIMSBY.
Default

Hi All
would quad cam heads be a better bet for the v12?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2020 | 07:44 PM
  #74  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

maybe , the cost would make things not worth the expense,, fact there is a post on Jag-lovers ,, quad cam V12
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2020 | 04:56 AM
  #75  
FerrariGuy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 258
Likes: 199
From: Columbia SC
Default

Originally Posted by DaimlerMK2
Hi All
would quad cam heads be a better bet for the v12?
You can put in an order: https://www.facebook.com/BuildingTheLegend/

It's not a 4V head, but a brilliant re-imagining of what Jaguar would have/could have done had they put the XK tech into the V12.

For us regular V12 owners I've speculated with Neville that his custom uprated oil driven chain tensioner might be useful for us mere mortal V12 owners.

~Paul K
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2020 | 05:07 PM
  #76  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

drawing from Jaguar , on the proposed 4 cam V12, they did build and tested ,made 502HP at 8000revs!
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
IMG (3).pdf (621.6 KB, 87 views)
File Type: pdf
IMG (3) (1).pdf (621.6 KB, 89 views)
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2020 | 09:28 PM
  #77  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

ThT was what the XJ13 made with 5 liters. Design to run at LeMans. The SOHC cam XJ engine ( used in the XJS ) made much more than that when spec’ed out for LeMans.

Group 44 started out at 525hp and finished at 630 hp
TWR was at more but I can’t find my numbers right now but it was reduced by the fuel mileage requirement.
Lister was at 804
 

Last edited by Mguar; Feb 17, 2020 at 09:30 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2020 | 07:17 PM
  #78  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

me being in Daytona for 30yrs , seen in person one of the Lister Storm cars, it was somewhat fast but debris caught it out and they were out of race!
engine couldnt see because it had the biggest air plenum i have ever seen, almost as big as the V12 it self!
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2023 | 07:42 PM
  #79  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
s10n that is a good price , BUT they are not custom designed for a hi performance engine!
also they are cast pistons, not recommended for BOOST applications!
HE heads are known to lose flow rate as rpm goes up, but just maybe boost could help that design push more air into cylinder(that is what we are trying to do?)!
ron
I have seen regular production cast pistons survive 30 psi of boost!! There are two ways to do that. First you can disassemble the pistons and open up the ring to .030 end gap. Or you can buy an engine with over 100,000 miles on it and the ring wear will typically be high enough that if you use E85 you won’t need to take it apart.
The advantage of a high mileage engine is that the wear allows greater oil flow required in racing applications.
The down side is a visible display of oil smoke on deceleration ( blue smoke). Plus higher oil consumption.

If you keep boost down to 6 psi. No real changes need be made assuming you keep mixtures around 12.7-1
You can’t really do that using stock Jaguar ECU’s. Aftermarket ECU’s can be used some like Megasquirt are self learning. Hook the wires up correctly and it will start and run and over time self adjust.
If you have a lap top and know how to tune. You can do it. To do so safely use a chassis Dyno. If you aren’t familiar use the tuner at the chassis Dyno although some of them really don’t how to tune. Ask questions first.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ronbros
XJS ( X27 )
81
Nov 1, 2023 09:15 AM
Alphatrev
Jaguar Engines & transmissions
6
Jul 7, 2021 10:11 AM
olivermarks
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
0
Feb 17, 2018 07:59 PM
geneo
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
0
Mar 30, 2017 11:12 AM
velder
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
2
Jul 6, 2011 01:28 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.