XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

2007 XK fluid leak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-10-2019, 11:25 AM
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 3,553
Received 2,156 Likes on 1,321 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sov211


No "conspiracy" was being suggested by me...the fact is that the engines were designed by Jaguar but built in the Ford engine plant at Bridgend (as I wrote above). And those who prefer to believe that Ford designed the engines should check the authoritative history of the V8 engine project (authoritative because the history is given by those who actually designed the engine and supervised the project; I do not have access to my bookshelf at the moment but when I do I will give the references). And of course it is normal and natural that Ford would use some of the Jaguar-designed elements: not only did they own Jaguar but their plant was/is producing the Jaguar engines in a dedicated facility.


OK...for those interested in the development of the Jaguar V8 engines (beginning with the 4.0 litre V8 for the XK8 and moving on the the 4.2 litre and 5 litre versions used in the XK [X150])), and especially for those who think that these engines were developed by Ford, there are a number of authoritative sources (as opposed to rumour or popular opinion). One of the best of these is Philip Porter's XK8, the Authorised Biography (Bay View Books Ltd., Bideford, Devon, 1996, especially chapter 5, "The AJ-V8 Engine"). You will note the publication date which is also the year of introduction of this engine - the predecessor of the 4.2 and 5.0 litre engines. So the information regarding the development of the V8 engine is immediate, not seen through the mists of time - and the respective roles of Ford and Jaguar in the development of the whole new car (the XK8) and its engine is presented in detail - including the roles of Jaguar's engineers, especially Dave Szczupak who managed the entire engine programme - he had been with Jagur since 1985 - and he is quoted as saying: "The (development of the) V8 engine started in the late eighties". Trevor Crisp, Powertrain Group Chief Engineeer (with Jaguar since 1954 - yes, 1954): "The AJ-V8 engine is only the fourth *totally new* concept in Jaguar's history." (both on p.65)...on p 66, Szczupak again: "This all started before Ford's ownership. The take-over didn't change the design, but it changed the way we managed the programme, particularly when the prospect of building the engine at Ford's Bridgend plant came along....". Dave Szczupak further says: "With Ford having a wide range of engines...there was a great deal of dialogue and healthy debate *as to whether Jaguar should continue to design this new engine*....why couldn't we modify a Ford engine?...having understood who our true competitors were, Ford realised that *we had to have a bespoke engine*..." (p.66)
OK so far? Now about Bridgend, Szczupack continues: "So the great debate then was whether the engine was going to be built at (Jaguar's) Radford or at (Ford's) Bridgend. Radford need a lot of refurbishment. Bridgend had an *empty building of ideal size, and the superb infrastructure of a completely modern, new facility*...We knew at Jaguar that we could not build the engine in the old Radford plant...the infrastructure available at Bridgend - as well as the sheer economics of this solution - made the decision obvious". (p.67).

There is a great deal of detailed information about every aspect of the V8 engine design, pages of it, cited in the words of the engineers themselves, and in Porter's overview: "The foundation of any engine, of course, is the block design, and guided by finite analysis, *the Jaguar engineers have striven to combine light weight with structural stiffness....*. Note - "the Jaguar engineers" - we are well beyond the idea of a Ford design...and regarding the (eventually) disastrous Nikasil use for the cylinder bores (never used in a Ford engine, by the way - but used also by BMW with the same sad result): "Rather than using conventional iron liners, the bores are plated with nikel-silicon carbide (Nikasil)....Once again *Jaguar (NOT FORD) has followed Formula I practice in adopting this technique...the Nikasil plating of the aluminium cylinder bores is a totally new technology for Jaguar* and indeed *BMW is the only volume manufacturer using it*." (p.72)...and "the precision cooling system has been patented by Jaguar" (NOT Ford); (p.72)..."A number of key suppliers were involved by Jaguar very early on...Cosworth helped with the cylinder head design in terms of casting technology. Kolbenschmidt, the block supplier, was also involved early on..." (p73). No mention of Ford at all among the suppliers. Further on: "While Trevor Crisp's role has been to oversee the whole powertrain, Dave Szczupak's has been to mastermind the AJ-V8 engine." (p.74). Page after page of authoritative, detailed information about engine development and production when Ford owned Jaguar, and none of it supports in any way the notion that Jaguar used Ford engines. The V6 later used in the S-Type and the X-Type did use the Ford Duratec block - but the top of the engine was a Jaguar design and while there are certain interchangeable parts, again the engineering was by Jaguar. Current engines, such as the 3.0 litre supercharged V6 and and the 5 litre V8 as used in the F-Type are Jaguar designs - and then there is the turbocharged 4 cylinder that puts out almost 300 hp....
Still not convinced? Is your membership in the Flat Earth Society paid for this year? (I know...but I can't help it...).
 

Last edited by sov211; 03-11-2019 at 12:26 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by sov211:
hafren (03-12-2019), ralphwg (03-10-2019)
  #22  
Old 03-10-2019, 04:06 PM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,269
Received 1,198 Likes on 931 Posts
Default

Similar story line for the Aston Martin V8 in the 4.2 and 4.7 Vantage. Jaguar lower half and Aston designed top half. I have seen V8V's with Jaguar oil filters. They fit, but don't have the correct spring for the Aston dry sump adaption on the shared block.
 
  #23  
Old 03-10-2019, 05:50 PM
pwpacp's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,335
Received 545 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

No claim here to have the inside on the whole Jag/Ford story but this is what I know of what was going on during the relationship.

During the aqiusition period, engineering managers were told only to help Jaguar learn how the Ford production system/philosiphy could be used to make themselves profitable again. I remember of no agreement or expectation that Jaguar's designs would be used for new engine development by Ford. That said though, it would be imposible to keep Jaguar product designs "secret" from Ford since they were the parent company.

There were many meetings as well as visits where ideas and plans were freely shared but only in the context of manufacturing planning. I remember several meetings where Jaguar presented their new engine designs while working through manufacturing design planning. That doesn't mean Ford utlimatly had no hand in egine design approval for obvious reasons.

Just my memory for what that might be worth.
 
The following users liked this post:
hafren (03-12-2019)
  #24  
Old 03-10-2019, 08:43 PM
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,453
Received 874 Likes on 633 Posts
Default

That Nikasil sure reached out and bit Jag engineers in the *** didn't it!
 
  #25  
Old 03-10-2019, 09:25 PM
ralphwg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 4,899
Received 1,189 Likes on 900 Posts
Default

I owned a 200 XJR with the Nikisil engine. The failure was only noticeable to me under full acceleration from mid-speed to highway speed plus and felt like an intermittent miss. I first noticed it on our annual Chicago to Naples road trip in January of 2002. I took the car into local dealers in both Naples and Orlando, neither of which could duplicate the issue. When I got back to Chicago I took the XJR into my "home" dealer, described the issue and left them to their work. My service writer called me that afternoon and gave me the good news/bad news story which amounted to Jaguar was going to replace my engine lock, stock and barrel at no charge. They did the right thing.

A friend of mine had a 2000 BMW 740iL who had the same issue. BMW shipped in a short block and the local dealer had to remove all of the "accessory" items from the old block and install them prior to installing the new engine in his car. Jaguar, on the other hand shipped in a complete engine with all of the "accessory" parts. The dealer only had to install the new engine; that struck me as abetter way to go. End of Story, I kept the car for an additional two years and made several additional long road trips with no problems of any kind
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Leeper
XK / XKR ( X150 )
12
08-16-2016 10:36 AM
davepick
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
1
04-07-2015 10:22 PM
SeismicGuy
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
1
10-15-2010 01:59 AM
ausman46
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
1
02-19-2009 04:58 PM
AccAuto
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
2
07-05-2008 10:54 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 2007 XK fluid leak



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.