Jaguar C-X75
1.6L 4cyl intercooled turbo/supercharged with quad electric motors
850bhp / 738lb-ft
Zero to 62 mph: 3.3 sec
Zero to 100mph: 6.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.2 sec
Top speed: 220 mph
Carbon fibre construction

Aston Martin One-77
7.3L V12 n/a
750bhp / 553lb-ft
Zero to 62 mph: 3.7 sec
Zero to 100mph: 6.7sec
Top speed: 220 mph
Carbon fibre chassis / aluminium body

 

I'll take the Aston, looks sinister.

 

Aston - 7,3 l rules


Jaguar - 1,6 l lost


I hate electric cars.


May be, I`m too oldschool, but I love a lot of cui and Zylinders!!

 

Jaguar looks more exotic, but I would need to drive them both and let you know ;-)

 

I love the smooth lines of the Aston, but what's up with that grill? Did they just run out of ideas? Looks like they just stuck a gauze bandage on it, or its a baleen whale sucking in krill.
Not a fan of the F-type mouth on the Jaguar, but it is better than Aston's choice.
Final vote, Jaguar, by a nose.

 

These are 2 different cars. The Aston is a production car and the Jaguar is a developmental car which never made it into production form. Given all things being equal, which they are not, I would love to see the C-X75 hit production.

 

The Aston looks like a fat wart hog!

 

The Jag's hips are part Lotus Evora, part F430... Actually a lot of the car looks to be a 3 way cross between Evora, F Type and 488 Ferrari...

 

I'll take the A/M, the grill may not be the prettiest ever hung on a car but I just don't care for electric cars.

 

From a styling viewpoint only, I prefer the C-X75. What was AM thinking with that big mouth - a whale shark?

 

Aston for me. The Jag is gorgeous but it looks like a mid engined (I'm not sure whether it is or isnt) supercar and I prefer the shape of front engined cars.

 

This is a ridiculous poll.

It's like asking which woman you would rather take to bed.

Given the chance i'd take either! Or both!

 

After looking at many more photos of both I'm not really crazy about either. There are just too many screwed up design elements on both. But I find myself having a less averse reaction looking at the Jag.

 

Results are pretty even i wonder if the same outcome would be had on an aston martin forum

 

Actually my favorite Aston by far is the zagatto. Obnoxious but gorgeous. I am one of those.

 

C-X75 winning! Proper thing on a Jaguar forum. Damn, that C-X75 looks good. Acura destroyed the NSX by making it look like an Acura. Even if the C-X75 went into production the front may have been significantly changed to conform to new safety regulations. I'm sure safely regulations had a big part in the deign of the F type's front end. I remember watching a show on the design of the F type with Ian Callum talking about the design of the car. He said the only part of new cars the designer has any flexibility is the rear end.

 

With a profile pic containing a c-x75 there was no doubt where your loyalty was going to lie! !!

 

OMG! How did that get there? I wish it were it my garage!

 

It would be interesting to speculate on the imaginary price-point a C-X75 would be launched at by JLR, vs the generally accepted price-point of the potential buyers (the $$$ they would be willing to actually part with to own one) of this car if it had been produced.

 

I think the market for this car would be comparable to a McLaren 650S, Ferrari 488. $300,000+, especially if they produced it with 650+hp. If they watered down the model with the standard 5LSC engine and no electric motors in the front it would compete in the P 911 turbo S market and above the F-type SVR. The decision to product the F-type killed the C-X75.


It would have been nice to see Jaguar build the C-X75 with a wide range of options from the 5LSC AWD to a hyper supercar. I was disappointed with the F-type when it first came out after seeing the C-X75. However, my next car just might be a F-type 5L AWD.