XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Intake retrofit in progress for our XKR!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2019 | 05:58 PM
  #1  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default Intake retrofit in progress for our XKR!

This is what's in progress ,
If it all works out well the system will use factory air filter , while allowing up to 40% more air flow .so no compromise as far as filter efficiency.
stay tuned


 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2019 | 03:00 PM
  #2  
Thorsen's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 2,755
From: Chicago
Default

Not trying to be funny, but is that the filter from a Shop Vac? Because that's almost exactly what the filter on my Shop Vac looks like.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by Thorsen
Not trying to be funny, but is that the filter from a Shop Vac? Because that's almost exactly what the filter on my Shop Vac looks like.
A filter is a filter they got plenty of car filters designed like that
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 05:27 PM
  #4  
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 882
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

I'm always overly skeptical about home made solutions to problems that never existed.
When and how did you determine that we all had this problem?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 05:31 PM
  #5  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,518
Likes: 4,910
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

I can't see how it can allow 40% more air flow - please show actual measurements at WOT that are so much bigger.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
I can't see how it can allow 40% more air flow - please show actual measurements at WOT that are so much bigger.
They do flow more for sure. I can't however measure the exact difference. Going by manufacturer claims our single filter is rated at 300 cfm, vs the new filters rated for 500cfm each .
And comparing filtering area vs hp, our oem setup is on the low end for size compared to other vehicles.
 

Last edited by AlexJag; Oct 28, 2019 at 07:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 07:41 PM
  #7  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by CleverName
I'm always overly skeptical about home made solutions to problems that never existed.
When and how did you determine that we all had this problem?
The same time that I figured out that 416 stock up wasn't enough and now nearly 100hp over that
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 11:41 PM
  #8  
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 760
From: california
Default

Is that going to affect your custom tune or will the ecm adapt....i am seriously looking at getting your tune for my 06 str after pulley is swapped out
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 12:27 AM
  #9  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
Is that going to affect your custom tune or will the ecm adapt....i am seriously looking at getting your tune for my 06 str after pulley is swapped out
Well so far results are inconclusive, maf readings seem to be higher than before indicating higher flow , but still have to verify on the dyno. There are some parameters related to intake restriction in the ECU , I haven't touched them yet ..
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
gkubrak's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 994
Likes: 709
From: CT, USA
Default

The filter itself may give higher flow, but the inlet area in the housing seems restrictive.

What about when you drive in the rain? Seems like they would easily get wet in that position.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 12:02 PM
  #11  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,395
From: Hastings
Default

The question you should have been looking at is not how much more air will one filter flow over the other.
You should be asking how much restriction is the air filter causing- the answer is nothing in all practicality.
Just pull the filter off, i.e 0% restriction, you car will not suck more air and not produce more power.

Air filters dont have the restriction you think they have.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 01:45 PM
  #12  
Canadacat's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 447
Likes: 162
From: KINGSVILLE, ONTARIO
Default

I understand the thinking of this if there was not a supercharger involved but the supercharger negates any increase in air as it is already pumping as much as it can....no?
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by Canadacat
I understand the thinking of this if there was not a supercharger involved but the supercharger negates any increase in air as it is already pumping as much as it can....no?
Not exactly. Supercharger, simply put is an air pump. Any restriction in the intake side is a loss of potential boost .

Here is a good article http://kennebell.net/tech/supercharg...ncy-explained/
 

Last edited by AlexJag; Oct 29, 2019 at 02:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2019 | 05:01 PM
  #14  
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 760
From: california
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Not exactly. Supercharger, simply put is an air pump. Any restriction in the intake side is a loss of potential boost .

Here is a good article Supercharger Efficiency Explained | Kenne Bell
Very informative read ...easy to understand....now it makes sense why max hp on my str is closer to redine.... whereas max hp on my 6 liter n/a chevy is more in the middle as engine vacuum decreases after a certain point.....bottom line is, i wish i had a twinscrew
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 12:49 AM
  #15  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
Very informative read ...easy to understand....now it makes sense why max hp on my str is closer to redine.... whereas max hp on my 6 liter n/a chevy is more in the middle as engine vacuum decreases after a certain point.....bottom line is, i wish i had a twinscrew
Scott there is plenty of potential locked up in the 4.2 engines if you have seen my Dyno charts threads.
Regarding the intake, I have a sneaky suspicion that I was correct and our oem filters are undersized. So far I'm setting records for highest maf readings ever and numbers do make sense. Still working out the kinks of our system which is very sensitive to air flow difference of each side. luckily with help of SDD JLR I can monitor each MAF sensor and adjust air flow as needed by blocking or opening up to even out the flow on both banks..
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 01:05 AM
  #16  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,310
Likes: 2,581
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

Ok, so I’m talking out of my **** here, but if the car is sensitive to airflow difference between sides, and all that air, from both sides goes to the same place, wouldn’t life be easier (when making these types of mods), to just put both sensors on the same side? Then they’ll read the same.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by kj07xk
Ok, so I’m talking out of my **** here, but if the car is sensitive to airflow difference between sides, and all that air, from both sides goes to the same place, wouldn’t life be easier (when making these types of mods), to just put both sensors on the same side? Then they’ll read the same.
Good idea but you're forgetting that the other side is going to be left open and unmonitored . It needs to calculate the total air by monitoring both openings, so if one sude flows more than the other but you have 2 maf on one side you might not get the correct reading
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 11:20 AM
  #18  
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 760
From: california
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Scott there is plenty of potential locked up in the 4.2 engines if you have seen my Dyno charts threads.
Regarding the intake, I have a sneaky suspicion that I was correct and our oem filters are undersized. So far I'm setting records for highest maf readings ever and numbers do make sense. Still working out the kinks of our system which is very sensitive to air flow difference of each side. luckily with help of SDD JLR I can monitor each MAF sensor and adjust air flow as needed by blocking or opening up to even out the flow on both banks..
you speak of 2 sides on your xkr...does that mean you have 2 intake tubes feeding your supercharger vs the 1 like I have on my str
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 02:14 PM
  #19  
AlexJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
you speak of 2 sides on your xkr...does that mean you have 2 intake tubes feeding your supercharger vs the 1 like I have on my str
Correct , 2 intake tubes, 2 maf and 2 filters
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2019 | 02:53 PM
  #20  
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 760
From: california
Default

ok...I did not know that...never seen an xkr engine....you have more potential hp than me I would think with more potential airflow to increase fueling.....maybe that is why the same year xkr is rated 420 hp and my str 400 hp, if i am correct
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.