XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Travel How Far?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 04:46 PM
  #1  
95 Cat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 210
Likes: 79
From: Granby CT
Default Travel How Far?

How long a trip would you take in your XKR if it had 76,000 miles on it and no signs of trouble?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 04:59 PM
  #2  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

As far as needed.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
JackJohn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 727
Likes: 202
From: Richmond, TX.
Default

I took a 3600 mile trip in my XKR last year with 85K on it and plan to do the same this year.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 06:10 PM
  #4  
MarkyUK's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 671
From: Somerset UK
Default

The journey should only be determined by how much petrol/gas you can afford

Only warning would be not 1000 further than your next service indicator light

Why the question?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 07:56 PM
  #5  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,623
From: Los Angeles
Default

I have well over 150,000 miles on my 2010 XKR and over 175,000 on my 2002 XKR, and I wouldn't hesitate for a moment driving either one on a trip of any length. I have confidence in both cars, and use my 2010 as my daily driver for over 20,000 miles per year. Enjoy your trip!
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
sparky fuze's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 537
Likes: 171
From: TO
Default

These cars should be able to go 400,000 miles or more with simple routine maintenance.

And a few new water pumps.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,124
Likes: 7,127
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

My only concern would be the lack of a spare tire, if your X150 came from the factory without one. I'm more comfortable with a compact spare than the factory-supplied can of tire sealant and a 12v air compressor.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2019 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 630
From: LA
Default

Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
 

Last edited by Brewtech; Mar 25, 2019 at 11:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 04:15 AM
  #9  
GGG's Avatar
GGG
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 120,439
Likes: 17,014
From: Durham, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Brewtech
Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
Are you intending to be humerous, abrasive or just accidentally landed in the wrong forum?

Graham
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 07:09 AM
  #10  
Canadacat's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 447
Likes: 162
From: KINGSVILLE, ONTARIO
Default

I traded a 350z (2007) plus cash for my 2007 xkr, couldn't be happier. The z cars are very reliable but they are aged and need re designed. They also have the crappiest tiny interiors.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 07:14 AM
  #11  
makecopies's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 253
Likes: 57
From: DC
Default

Originally Posted by Canadacat
I traded a 350z (2007) plus cash for my 2007 xkr, couldn't be happier. The z cars are very reliable but they are aged and need re designed. They also have the crappiest tiny interiors.
I had a 350Z that car was so fun with the manual transmission! Couldn't stop driving it LOL. Kept finding excuses to go somewhere
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 07:54 AM
  #12  
110reef's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 768
Likes: 251
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by GGG
Are you intending to be humerous, abrasive or just accidentally landed in the wrong forum?

Graham
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 08:26 AM
  #13  
80sRule's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 918
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by 110reef
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
That's immediately what I got too lol.

The Z cars are cool too, I had a boss with a stick Infiniti G37X Coupe that I found quite nice. We both liked my Jaguars more but that thing was really nice for a year round GTish coupe! Even the early 350zs are neat little cars and I've had fun each time I drove one.

Two years ago I took my then 17yo 100k mile 2000 XKR (very similar drivetrain as it is a 4.0SC but different transmission) on a 700 mile trip and the only hiccup was a nail in a tire that was near replacement anyway. The X150 is so much more reliable a platform that I'd get in my car and drive anywhere right now. I've only had my car 8 months, but it's clear that Jaguar really did do a lot to develop a fantastic replacement for the X100 platform.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 08:41 AM
  #14  
makecopies's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 253
Likes: 57
From: DC
Default

400k? hmmm That would be impressive!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 09:49 AM
  #15  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,124
Likes: 7,127
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by makecopies
400k? hmmm That would be impressive!!!!
Particularly since it's impossible for me to live long enough to see it!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 09:52 AM
  #16  
110reef's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 768
Likes: 251
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
Particularly since it's impossible for me to live long enough to see it!
Not if you get busy driving.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 12:26 PM
  #17  
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,524
From: Victoria, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Brewtech
Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
Assuming that you are serious in making this comment, it is clear that you have no real experience with Jaguars and the longevity of their engines. The Nissan is obviously a car you prefer. If, on the other hand, you were being facetious, well, I have missed the point.
The durability of Jaguar engines and their engineering advances have been hallmarks since the 6 cylinder XK engine first appeared in the XK120. There have been a couple of missteps: the nikasil coating (and BMW had exactly the same problem at the same time) and the timing chain tensioner issue (both of these on the early 4.0 litre V8)...and water pump issues, but none of this is exclusive to Jaguar engines. The glorious V12 engine, properly serviced, was good for at least 300,000 miles...and we have just been given statements by XK owners of high mileages....so the implication that after 80,000 miles the engine is "worthless" is an uninformed opinion.
But then, I have only owned more than 30 Jags, so my experience is limited.
 

Last edited by sov211; Mar 26, 2019 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 12:46 PM
  #18  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,323
Likes: 2,597
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

Originally Posted by 110reef
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
Yes, clearly (at least to me), a poke at the worry wart in that other thread (several weeks back).
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 12:53 PM
  #19  
sparky fuze's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 537
Likes: 171
From: TO
Default

The world is your oyster!

 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2019 | 01:23 PM
  #20  
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 630
From: LA
Default

Originally Posted by sov211
Assuming that you are serious in making this comment, it is clear that you have no real experience with Jaguars and the longevity of their engines. The Nissan is obviously a car you prefer. If, on the other hand, you were being facetious, well, I have missed the point.
The durability of Jaguar engines and their engineering advances have been hallmarks since the 6 cylinder XK engine first appeared in the XK120. There have been a couple of missteps: the nikasil coating (and BMW had exactly the same problem at the same time) and the timing chain tensioner issue (both of these on the early 4.0 litre V8)...and water pump issues, but none of this is exclusive to Jaguar engines. The glorious V12 engine, properly serviced, was good for at least 300,000 miles...and we have just been given statements by XK owners of high mileages....so the implication that after 80,000 miles the engine is "worthless" is an uninformed opinion.
But then, I have only owned more than 30 Jags, so my experience is limited.
I was being funny. I currently own 3 Jags and a Lotus. No love for new Z cars. Not long ago a guy came in here with no issues except for his extreme paranoia, and his Z was the center of stability for him. Id drive a Jag to hell and back.
1994 XJ40 with 81k miles
1994 XJS 4.0 with 172k miles
2007 XK with 136k miles
 

Last edited by Brewtech; Mar 26, 2019 at 01:26 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.