XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Travel How Far?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-25-2019, 04:46 PM
95 Cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Granby CT
Posts: 210
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default Travel How Far?

How long a trip would you take in your XKR if it had 76,000 miles on it and no signs of trouble?
 
  #2  
Old 03-25-2019, 04:59 PM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,269
Received 1,197 Likes on 931 Posts
Default

As far as needed.
 
  #3  
Old 03-25-2019, 06:07 PM
JackJohn's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Richmond, TX.
Posts: 728
Received 198 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

I took a 3600 mile trip in my XKR last year with 85K on it and plan to do the same this year.
 
  #4  
Old 03-25-2019, 06:10 PM
MarkyUK's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 1,628
Received 666 Likes on 451 Posts
Default

The journey should only be determined by how much petrol/gas you can afford

Only warning would be not 1000 further than your next service indicator light

Why the question?
 
  #5  
Old 03-25-2019, 07:56 PM
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,978
Received 2,540 Likes on 1,411 Posts
Default

I have well over 150,000 miles on my 2010 XKR and over 175,000 on my 2002 XKR, and I wouldn't hesitate for a moment driving either one on a trip of any length. I have confidence in both cars, and use my 2010 as my daily driver for over 20,000 miles per year. Enjoy your trip!
 
The following users liked this post:
GGG (03-27-2019)
  #6  
Old 03-25-2019, 08:24 PM
sparky fuze's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: TO
Posts: 537
Received 169 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

These cars should be able to go 400,000 miles or more with simple routine maintenance.

And a few new water pumps.
 
  #7  
Old 03-25-2019, 08:52 PM
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 9,158
Received 6,136 Likes on 3,382 Posts
Default

My only concern would be the lack of a spare tire, if your X150 came from the factory without one. I'm more comfortable with a compact spare than the factory-supplied can of tire sealant and a 12v air compressor.
 
  #8  
Old 03-25-2019, 11:38 PM
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,496
Received 623 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
 

Last edited by Brewtech; 03-25-2019 at 11:40 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-26-2019, 04:15 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,407
Received 16,768 Likes on 12,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brewtech
Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
Are you intending to be humerous, abrasive or just accidentally landed in the wrong forum?

Graham
 
  #10  
Old 03-26-2019, 07:09 AM
Canadacat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: KINGSVILLE, ONTARIO
Posts: 425
Received 153 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

I traded a 350z (2007) plus cash for my 2007 xkr, couldn't be happier. The z cars are very reliable but they are aged and need re designed. They also have the crappiest tiny interiors.
 
  #11  
Old 03-26-2019, 07:14 AM
makecopies's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: DC
Posts: 253
Received 57 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canadacat
I traded a 350z (2007) plus cash for my 2007 xkr, couldn't be happier. The z cars are very reliable but they are aged and need re designed. They also have the crappiest tiny interiors.
I had a 350Z that car was so fun with the manual transmission! Couldn't stop driving it LOL. Kept finding excuses to go somewhere
 
  #12  
Old 03-26-2019, 07:54 AM
110reef's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 769
Received 247 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GGG
Are you intending to be humerous, abrasive or just accidentally landed in the wrong forum?

Graham
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by 110reef:
Cee Jay (03-26-2019), kj07xk (03-26-2019)
  #13  
Old 03-26-2019, 08:26 AM
80sRule's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 1,865
Received 915 Likes on 560 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 110reef
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
That's immediately what I got too lol.

The Z cars are cool too, I had a boss with a stick Infiniti G37X Coupe that I found quite nice. We both liked my Jaguars more but that thing was really nice for a year round GTish coupe! Even the early 350zs are neat little cars and I've had fun each time I drove one.

Two years ago I took my then 17yo 100k mile 2000 XKR (very similar drivetrain as it is a 4.0SC but different transmission) on a 700 mile trip and the only hiccup was a nail in a tire that was near replacement anyway. The X150 is so much more reliable a platform that I'd get in my car and drive anywhere right now. I've only had my car 8 months, but it's clear that Jaguar really did do a lot to develop a fantastic replacement for the X100 platform.
 
  #14  
Old 03-26-2019, 08:41 AM
makecopies's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: DC
Posts: 253
Received 57 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

400k? hmmm That would be impressive!!!!
 
  #15  
Old 03-26-2019, 09:49 AM
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 9,158
Received 6,136 Likes on 3,382 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by makecopies
400k? hmmm That would be impressive!!!!
Particularly since it's impossible for me to live long enough to see it!
 
  #16  
Old 03-26-2019, 09:52 AM
110reef's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 769
Received 247 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
Particularly since it's impossible for me to live long enough to see it!
Not if you get busy driving.
 
  #17  
Old 03-26-2019, 12:26 PM
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 3,517
Received 2,130 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brewtech
Id take it to the nearest used car lot and trade it in for similar mileage Nissan 370z. . Anything past 80k is worthless.
Assuming that you are serious in making this comment, it is clear that you have no real experience with Jaguars and the longevity of their engines. The Nissan is obviously a car you prefer. If, on the other hand, you were being facetious, well, I have missed the point.
The durability of Jaguar engines and their engineering advances have been hallmarks since the 6 cylinder XK engine first appeared in the XK120. There have been a couple of missteps: the nikasil coating (and BMW had exactly the same problem at the same time) and the timing chain tensioner issue (both of these on the early 4.0 litre V8)...and water pump issues, but none of this is exclusive to Jaguar engines. The glorious V12 engine, properly serviced, was good for at least 300,000 miles...and we have just been given statements by XK owners of high mileages....so the implication that after 80,000 miles the engine is "worthless" is an uninformed opinion.
But then, I have only owned more than 30 Jags, so my experience is limited.
 

Last edited by sov211; 03-26-2019 at 12:29 PM.
  #18  
Old 03-26-2019, 12:46 PM
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Naperville, Illinois USA
Posts: 4,567
Received 1,888 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 110reef
I believe that he was poking fun at a previous poster who bought an XK after trading in his Z, then he became so paralyzed with fear about potential reliability issues (that he never had) that he eventually got rid of the XK.
Yes, clearly (at least to me), a poke at the worry wart in that other thread (several weeks back).
 
The following users liked this post:
Cee Jay (03-26-2019)
  #19  
Old 03-26-2019, 12:53 PM
sparky fuze's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: TO
Posts: 537
Received 169 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

The world is your oyster!

 
  #20  
Old 03-26-2019, 01:23 PM
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,496
Received 623 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sov211
Assuming that you are serious in making this comment, it is clear that you have no real experience with Jaguars and the longevity of their engines. The Nissan is obviously a car you prefer. If, on the other hand, you were being facetious, well, I have missed the point.
The durability of Jaguar engines and their engineering advances have been hallmarks since the 6 cylinder XK engine first appeared in the XK120. There have been a couple of missteps: the nikasil coating (and BMW had exactly the same problem at the same time) and the timing chain tensioner issue (both of these on the early 4.0 litre V8)...and water pump issues, but none of this is exclusive to Jaguar engines. The glorious V12 engine, properly serviced, was good for at least 300,000 miles...and we have just been given statements by XK owners of high mileages....so the implication that after 80,000 miles the engine is "worthless" is an uninformed opinion.
But then, I have only owned more than 30 Jags, so my experience is limited.
I was being funny. I currently own 3 Jags and a Lotus. No love for new Z cars. Not long ago a guy came in here with no issues except for his extreme paranoia, and his Z was the center of stability for him. Id drive a Jag to hell and back.
1994 XJ40 with 81k miles
1994 XJS 4.0 with 172k miles
2007 XK with 136k miles
 

Last edited by Brewtech; 03-26-2019 at 01:26 PM.


Quick Reply: Travel How Far?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.