XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

XK model Resurrection?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2020 | 01:15 PM
  #21  
Texasdang87's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 31
Likes: 5
Default Xk love it


Beautiful car

 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2020 | 04:27 PM
  #22  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,890
Likes: 6,401
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Jaguar DID design a new, cool, almost Hyper Car..... for Gran Turismo. A freakin' Video Game.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2021 | 09:25 AM
  #23  
SEAICE's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 77
From: Seattle
Default

Nice looking (the rendering), but the rear quarter and the hood bulge are the only Jaguar-looking aspects to this car. Everything else is generic new styling. I see shades of my previous car, a 2014 BMW Z4:
 

Last edited by SEAICE; Feb 12, 2021 at 09:26 AM. Reason: add context
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2021 | 10:12 AM
  #24  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,623
From: Los Angeles
Default

Even though this whole thread is an exercise in "wishful thinking," let me reiterate what I don't like about the rendering (and the BMW Z4). One of the characteristics of every beautiful Jaguar ever built are the rear haunches and how they flow into the door panels moving forward. In the rendering shown, the rear haunches come to an abrupt end at the door's rear panel gap, no forward momemtum. Then an arbitrary stamped door crease having no relation to the arch of the rear haunch appears out of nowhere just above the door handle. The Z4 exhibits the same design characteristic except that the crease goes through the door handle. This is not how Jaguars are designed and is an inexperienced photo shop designer showing his/her lack of skill.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2021 | 10:30 AM
  #25  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,890
Likes: 6,401
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Originally Posted by tberg
............................ One of the characteristics of every beautiful Jaguar ever built are the rear haunches and how they flow into the door panels moving forward. In the rendering shown, the rear haunches come to an abrupt end at the door's rear panel gap, no forward momemtum. Then an arbitrary stamped door crease having no relation to the arch of the rear haunch appears out of nowhere just above the door handle.................
You want haunches? Talk to the King...


 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2021 | 01:21 PM
  #26  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,316
Likes: 2,594
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay

And a useful trunk. Yours?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2021 | 02:17 PM
  #27  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,890
Likes: 6,401
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Originally Posted by kj07xk
And a useful trunk. Yours?
Yeah, I wish. I wish a LOT. Closest I had was a 1969 Coronet 440. Mine was a heap though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2021 | 04:17 PM
  #28  
George Abitbol's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 279
Likes: 191
From: Luxembourg
Default

Originally Posted by KrazyIvanUSA
I am sure this had to be posted in the forum somewhere, but I couldn't find it.

This article came out in May/2020. Looks like Jaguar may be giving the XK another go, though it might be labeled an F-Type 2x2.

https://www.motor1.com/news/424957/j...upe-rendering/
I wouldn't trust someone with such a hairdo...
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 03:10 PM
  #29  
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,524
From: Victoria, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by tberg
Even though this whole thread is an exercise in "wishful thinking," let me reiterate what I don't like about the rendering (and the BMW Z4). One of the characteristics of every beautiful Jaguar ever built are the rear haunches and how they flow into the door panels moving forward. In the rendering shown, the rear haunches come to an abrupt end at the door's rear panel gap, no forward momemtum. Then an arbitrary stamped door crease having no relation to the arch of the rear haunch appears out of nowhere just above the door handle. The Z4 exhibits the same design characteristic except that the crease goes through the door handle. This is not how Jaguars are designed and is an inexperienced photo shop designer showing his/her lack of skill.
Right. This is how Jaguars are designed so that your eye flows from front to rear or rear to front without a break, the entire body a graceful exercise in elegance - nothing extra, just a timeless beauty:

1992 Series III V12 Vanden Plas:

and the 2007 XK:



and the F-Type - all three of these have the characteristic haunch over the rear wheel, and all three have a smooth visual flow without extraneous interruptions, with nothing unnecessary:






The haunch over the rear wheel was even in the under-appreciated but excellent X-Type sedan (but not the wagon - although the uninterrupted visual flow is there as well):




and further back in time: the Mk 2 no haunch but an uninterrupted flow from front to rear:



or the 1950's XK140:


and then there is the Maserati, designed by a committee whose members agreed on nothing, or the Mercedes tank-like lump (designed in the same period as the beautiful Series I XJ6)





 

Last edited by sov211; Feb 17, 2021 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 03:59 PM
  #30  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 7,123
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by sov211
...
and then there is the Maserati, designed by a committee whose members agreed on nothing, or the tank-like lump:

That Maserati looks like a Mercedes!

P.S. Since you mentioned a tank, look closely at this picture and see if you can determine what I was riding in when I took this photo in 1968.

 

Last edited by Stuart S; Feb 17, 2021 at 04:09 PM. Reason: Added P.S.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 06:06 PM
  #31  
fxdwg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 184
Likes: 136
From: Oklahoma, USA
Default

A Mercedes 200 series sedan!
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 07:22 PM
  #32  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 7,123
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

Exactly! And it had air conditioning!
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 07:49 PM
  #33  
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,524
From: Victoria, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
Exactly! And it had air conditioning!
And so did the XJ6, which for Canada and the US was a "no options" car - virtually everything that was an option in the UK was standard equipment ffor North America. But the most important standard feature was that, in contrast to its contemporary rivals, it was beautiful - and the 1969 to 1973 Series I XJ is still beautiful. The Mercedes never was and age has not improved it!

On second reading of the posts immediately above, I see that the humour escaped me....
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2021 | 08:09 PM
  #34  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 7,123
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by sov211
... the 1969 to 1973 Series I XJ is still beautiful. The Mercedes never was and age has not improved it!

On second reading of the posts immediately above, I see that the humour escaped me....
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To me, that Mercedes was the most beautiful car in the universe - under the circumstances at that time and place. It sure beat riding in a tank!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2021 | 01:49 PM
  #35  
fxdwg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 184
Likes: 136
From: Oklahoma, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To me, that Mercedes was the most beautiful car in the universe - under the circumstances at that time and place. It sure beat riding in a tank!

The tank was probably faster, though!
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2021 | 02:51 PM
  #36  
XKRAU's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 224
Likes: 136
From: Sydney
Default

The facelifted F-type front looks too much like the Mazda 3 and MX5 front - looks too generic.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2021 | 05:06 PM
  #37  
George Abitbol's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 279
Likes: 191
From: Luxembourg
Default

Originally Posted by XKRAU
The facelifted F-type front looks too much like the Mazda 3 and MX5 front - looks too generic.
To me as well. I think the front of the pre-facelift model is much more beautiful!
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2021 | 04:36 PM
  #38  
Reverend Sam's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 1,274
From: North Carolina
Default

It looks like they copied a Ford Mustang.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sharx8
XK / XKR ( X150 )
103
Apr 16, 2022 07:31 PM
Sean W
XK / XKR ( X150 )
117
Apr 15, 2022 08:26 AM
XJDanny
XK / XKR ( X150 )
2
Jul 20, 2019 09:40 PM
amcdonal86
XK / XKR ( X150 )
18
Dec 12, 2014 04:03 PM
JustNiz
XK / XKR ( X150 )
1
Mar 13, 2014 08:58 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.