XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

Namless Cats Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2013 | 02:37 PM
  #1  
enderle's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default Namless Cats Dyno Results

This is on a Superflow Dyno which tends to run very low compared to other dynos I've used but the net change after the Nameless Cats was almost exactly 30 HP. Once I put the McLaud exhaust and Paragon intake on I'll run it again and post an update on my mod thread as I think I'm still constrained over the wheels on exhaust and the stock intake is a known issue.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2013 | 02:55 PM
  #2  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

Sweet! Thanks for the results!

You better hide this thread from SeismicGuy, he might have an aneurysm.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2013 | 04:11 PM
  #3  
ccfulton's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 1,120
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default

Respectable gain for just changing the cats. Any dyno plots for us to drool over?

Thanks for posting the results.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2013 | 08:57 PM
  #4  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

Wow! 30 RWHP seems like a lot for just swapping the cat for a tubular down pipe. Did you get a readout on any boost increase because of the reduced backpressure?

Did you run the car on the same dyno before and after? And the diff was 30 HP? That is a worthwhile investment. And you are saying there where no other changes except the downpipes?
 

Last edited by GordoCatCar; May 11, 2013 at 09:06 PM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2013 | 11:25 PM
  #5  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 571
From: Los Angeles
Default

Here I am. I have to admit I'm skeptical. Are these cats ones that actually have catalyst in them and would be at least semi street legal (of course here in Kalifornia nothing is street legal except for the potholes).

Doug
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 05:55 AM
  #6  
Krajcok's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 18
From: Poland
Default

Originally Posted by enderle
Nameless Cats was almost exactly 30 HP.
Do you have dyno sheet?

I suggest 'upgrading' our cars with CAI, 200 cell sport cats and LED's and you have 100 hp gain. Now you don't need spend money on twin scroll Kenne Bell Supercharger

This modyfication (adding 200 cell catalytic converters) in a well running stock engine can add up to 10 hp. Be realistic. More noise doesn't equal more power.
 

Last edited by Krajcok; May 12, 2013 at 06:02 AM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 10:50 AM
  #7  
enderle's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default Dyno Results

Here are the dyno charts, I rant full analysis the second time in prep for an ECU tune. Once again Superflows run really low so are best for just checking out deltas.

The first two show the runs on the Superflow, the last chart is an old Dynapack done around the time of the first Superflow just to show how low the Superflow is. HP is rear wheel.

I did add two resonators when I put on the Nameless cats (and these are cats not downpipes). I'd been running an x-pipe and just tail mufflers and the Nameless downpipes were so much louder that couldn't really drive the car so had to tone them down a bit. It is amazing how much loader the car gets when you put the cats on. I'd put in exhaust cutouts for fun when I pulled the resonators but with the Nameless cats the car was louder with the cutouts closed than the car had been with the stock cats and the cutouts open. And with the nameless cats and the cutouts open you'd wake the dead in the next county so they had to go. All of that happened between runs though.

Had a boost gauge installed in the meantime, boost was 12lbs at peak latest run.

Here are the pictures:
 
Attached Thumbnails Namless Cats Dyno Results-superflow-62012-small.jpg   Namless Cats Dyno Results-superflow-52013-small.jpg   Namless Cats Dyno Results-dynapack2.jpg  

Last edited by enderle; May 12, 2013 at 01:47 PM. Reason: Left something out.
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 11:36 AM
  #8  
Krajcok's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 18
From: Poland
Default

I exchanged mine stock cats (which are 400 cell) first with catless downpipes. The sound was 'dirty' and agressive but the car was to loud in cabin. Moreover the smell of exhaust gases was terrible:


I put on magnaflow 200 cell cats and the sound is almost the same as with the cat back exhaust and stock catalytic converters (I use X-pipe and two custom made rear mufflers):


I haven't dynoed my car after this mod but my butt dyno says there is no power gain although the sound is nice. The car is weaker in range 1500-2500 rpm. Acceleration times 0-200 kph are similar too.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #9  
Brutal's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,255
Likes: 2,209
From: Damon /Houston, Texas
Default

gun4hire ran his on a dyno dynamic for before and after(the shop did the install then reran 2 hours later 3 runs before and 3 after temps to operating) and iirc was 25 more to the ground. So good gains
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 571
From: Los Angeles
Default

So Bob--what's the bottom line here? I want to make sure I understand the terminology. I thought the stock "downpipes" had integrated cats--am I wrong. If so, then the stock cats/downpipes are ??? cell and the new nameless performance ones are ???? cell and you got 30 hp just from that according to the dyno (fill in the ???).

Thanks,

Doug
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 100
From: NY
Default

How many miles were on the stock cats? They might have been clogged.

I gained less than 10 hp according to the dyno with Nameless cat-less downpipes. About 15 hp according to 1/4 mile testing.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...es-dyno-41275/
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 03:25 PM
  #12  
enderle's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default

Originally Posted by SeismicGuy
So Bob--what's the bottom line here? I want to make sure I understand the terminology. I thought the stock "downpipes" had integrated cats--am I wrong. If so, then the stock cats/downpipes are ??? cell and the new nameless performance ones are ???? cell and you got 30 hp just from that according to the dyno (fill in the ???).

Thanks,

Doug
The catalytic converters are built into the down pipes, Nameless sells replacements either with or without the catalytic converters built in. I bought the ones with the 200 cell cats. After pulling the stock downpipe/cats and replacing them with the Nameless downpipe/cat replacements I got about another 30 HP at the rear wheels. The detailed results are posted above.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 03:36 PM
  #13  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Krajcok
I exchanged mine stock cats (which are 400 cell) first with catless downpipes. The sound was 'dirty' and agressive but the car was to loud in cabin. Moreover the smell of exhaust gases was terrible:
If you're smelling exhaust gasses, you must have done something wrong. There is absolutely no exhaust gassing in my cabin and I'm really sensitive to fumes, so dunno what to say about that. I don't have much cabin noise, but I have a Borla center muffler and the Mina rears. It's not noticeably louder cruising than it was before, but it's much louder when you accelerate. At least with mine.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 03:46 PM
  #14  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SeismicGuy
So Bob--what's the bottom line here? I want to make sure I understand the terminology. I thought the stock "downpipes" had integrated cats--am I wrong.
These are the factory cats:

Originally Posted by XKRacer
These are the NP cats:



Perhaps you can understand why I think you're crazy if you think they only add sound. :P
 
Attached Thumbnails Namless Cats Dyno Results-img_0860.jpg   Namless Cats Dyno Results-jaguarxkr1g936971315439.jpg   Namless Cats Dyno Results-jaguarxkr1g936971315439.jpg  

Last edited by xenophobe; May 12, 2013 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #15  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 571
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by SteveM
How many miles were on the stock cats? They might have been clogged.

I gained less than 10 hp according to the dyno with Nameless cat-less downpipes. About 15 hp according to 1/4 mile testing.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...es-dyno-41275/

The most aggressive improvement I ever heard over at the Corvette Forum from doing exhaust mod was about 25-35HP and that was from installing long tube custom headers. Even Nameless Performance were not touting 30HP increases (thought it was more like 11hp) and the manufacturers pretty much always overstate performance gains. Which is why the 30HP increase just from swapping the stock cats for the NP cats seems astounding to say the least. Still if that's what was measured I guess that's what it is.

Doug
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 06:59 PM
  #16  
JgaXkr's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 283
From: Boston Mass
Default

I agree the original cats may have been partially blocked as that would explain the increase.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 08:20 PM
  #17  
Kevin D's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 811
Likes: 127
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by JgaXkr
I agree the original cats may have been partially blocked as that would explain the increase.
+1
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #18  
enderle's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default

Originally Posted by SeismicGuy
The most aggressive improvement I ever heard over at the Corvette Forum from doing exhaust mod was about 25-35HP and that was from installing long tube custom headers. Even Nameless Performance were not touting 30HP increases (thought it was more like 11hp) and the manufacturers pretty much always overstate performance gains. Which is why the 30HP increase just from swapping the stock cats for the NP cats seems astounding to say the least. Still if that's what was measured I guess that's what it is.

Doug
I'd already changed out the exhaust so think that when I put on the new cats I finally got the benefit from the other changes (I was getting nothing from the other changes until I changed the cats). I can't explain it any other way though. I posted the charts.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 12:45 AM
  #19  
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,070
From: Europe
Default

Here is another thread with a larger exhaust, where just downpipes (without cats where installed). That yielded about 10-12 rwhp.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...es-dyno-41275/

Most other dynos I've seen on our cars with sport cats where about the same. also on my car the sport cats would only have yielded 10 to 15 rwhp or so.

I would also guess that there where other things at play that gave you such a big difference, like jgaxkr suggested or something else, who knows.

Edit: LoL, I missed SteveM post earlier, sorry for the double post.
 

Last edited by avos; May 13, 2013 at 12:55 AM.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 04:07 AM
  #20  
Krajcok's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 18
From: Poland
Default

Originally Posted by xenophobe
If you're smelling exhaust gasses, you must have done something wrong.
xenophobe, my exhaust is welded and sealed properly.

I mean crusing with widows opened with low speeds or fence gate opening when going to work, etc. It was quite annoying. Now, with sport cats the problem is solved, although I miss the sound of free flowing fumes

On the other hand there are many possible ways to get better sound from XKR.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.