XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

Additional intercooler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 03:54 PM
  #1  
Krajcok's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 18
From: Poland
Default Additional intercooler?

What do you think of placing another air to water IC before existing intercooling manifolds?

I'm during the proces of adapting Kenne Bell 2.2 supercharger on my XKR. I can:

1. CNC machine simple adaptor connecting new blower with stock intake manifold ('V8' mark on it)

or

2. CNC machine completely new adaptor connecting supercharger with intercooling manifolds. It might have built-in air to water intercooler that would be connected with big front chargecooler. With 50% cooling efficiency I hope to achive I wouldn't have to go for water/methanol injection.

What are your opinions?
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
ccfulton's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 1,120
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default

The stock intercooler is actually pretty good as far as the heat exchanger goes, it looks more like a heater core than a typical factory intercooler.

My opinion is that adding another radiator right at the S/C outlet could cost you more as a flow restriction than it would gain you in air temp. I don't have any scientific evidence to support this, but it's what intuition tells me.

I would highly recommend chemically cleaning the stock intercoolers, as they get pretty gummed up with oil sludge from the part load breather. After that, a catch can will help keep the gunk to a minimum.

Also, the V8 piece itself does present some restriction so if you have the capability, there might be value in CNC machining a new outlet rather than using an adapter plate.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 11:41 PM
  #3  
Krajcok's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 18
From: Poland
Default

You are right - another radiator's resistance will probably consume little power. But running with lower charge temps decrease risk of detonation - that is why I consider placing another heat exchanger.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 12:35 AM
  #4  
bfarrell's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 156
Likes: 46
From: Toronto
Default

Killer chiller.... Genius in my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 01:37 PM
  #5  
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 174
From: NYC
Default

Twin screws in my past experience (Not on Jags) tend to have lower ACT at higher boost than roots blowers or the twin helix design such as our eatons. The Twin screws also however compress air unlike the eatons which move air only. In data logs Ive noticed increased ACT at lower boost pressures and around town driving than with the eatons. What this could possably mean is a higher chance of heat soak, a point in which the heat exchanger cannot effectively disperse the heat.

I know there are people who have logged ACT on the jaguars and from my understanding they feel as is the IC's and heat exchanger works well. I can tell you modifying the blower hat allthough restrictive looking will net little to no gain. If you add an additional heat exchanger prior to water flowing into the IC's it cant hurt. Either could increasing actual intercooler capacity. Havent seen anyone do that yet
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dutch xjrdiamond
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
9
Nov 30, 2019 09:14 PM
Malihide
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
11
Sep 29, 2015 03:21 PM
UKnFor-dluv-expat
X-Type ( X400 )
1
Sep 26, 2015 08:40 PM
redgear
XJS ( X27 )
1
Sep 26, 2015 07:21 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.