XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

Center muffler delete

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
DaveC's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 702
Likes: 133
From: Singapore
Default Center muffler delete

Purchased my XK8 a few months ago and was poking around under the sar and noticed that the center muffler was missing. It was a clean looking removal (nicely welded) but I'm wondering if this has any impact beyond the exhaust note?
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #2  
Cerberus66's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 230
Likes: 15
From: Dallas Texas
Default

Does your car have a nice rumble?
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #3  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

Other than increase in-cabin noise? It sounds louder outside too. That's about it though.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
Cerberus66's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 230
Likes: 15
From: Dallas Texas
Default

it doesnt give us another 100HP??????
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
Jacsun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 420
Likes: 78
From: Chicago West Burbs
Default

Dave, I suspect you have an "X" shaped pipe in place of the muffler? These are widely available and commonly used. Many feel the Jag is painfully quiet for such mean looks. Whatever you have is most likely "all about the sound". Unlikely it is hurting anything and unlikely it is helping anything (like HP). Enjoy the sound while some of us whisper down the road.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 12:58 PM
  #6  
DaveC's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 702
Likes: 133
From: Singapore
Default

No crossover connection between the left and right bank. They are totally independent. It does seem to have a nice rumble but not loud and the cabin is church quiet when cruising on the freeway. Since I havn't heard any other XKs I'm not sure how much louder I am but, I can say when you light the fuse you know it!
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #7  
Richboy47's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 2
From: Miami,fl
Default

You get a little noticeable pick up on the low end just because you have less restriction in the exhaust process.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 05:22 PM
  #8  
maxwdg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 280
Likes: 70
From: Kansas City Area
Default

About a year and a half ago, I had my center muffler pulled off my 2003 XKR and replaced by two straight pipes to the first resonators - with an old fashioned H-Pipe connection, just after the transmission crossover.

I did it for the sound. "Whisper quiet" Jag was ruining my rep as the rowdy old gear head in the neighborhood!

Well, I don't think my rep was restored. It's a barely noticeable improvement in sound quality - but hey, it actually makes a slight rumble now and what DaveC said: "it's church quiet when cruising" is true for me too.

IMHO, Log manifolds, two cats and six muffling devices is ridiculous on a performance car! Next year, I plan high-flow (or possibly gutted cats with a fabricated MIL eliminators) and flowmaster mufflers.

The cat WILL growl then!
 

Last edited by maxwdg; Dec 16, 2012 at 10:08 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 11:45 PM
  #9  
DaveC's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 702
Likes: 133
From: Singapore
Default

Any thoughts about the Mina rear muffler delete? I like sound but don't want to go nuts.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 06:51 AM
  #10  
WhiteXKR's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,657
Likes: 3,019
From: Arlington VA USA
Default

Originally Posted by DaveC
Any thoughts about the Mina rear muffler delete? I like sound but don't want to go nuts.
The Mina setup is quite pleasant and not overly loud.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #11  
OregonJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 82
From: Lake Oswego, OR
Default

Not sure what the difference is between Mina's rear muffler delete and what I did by just replacing the rear mufflers with pipes. I'll be trying something different as the drone at 2000-2200 rpm is too much. Climbing a hill at 60 mph will vibrate the whole car. I'm planning to put rear mufflers back on and try some variations on removing the center muffler. Probably start with complete separation then maybe try an x-pipe.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #12  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

The biggest inhibitor of high quality exhaust note is the factory Jaguar catalytic converters. I got much more and much better sound from replacing those than I did replacing everything past them. Just saying...
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 02:20 PM
  #13  
DaveC's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 702
Likes: 133
From: Singapore
Default

xenophobe,

What aftermarket cats did you find that complied with CARB requirements?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #14  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DaveC
xenophobe,

What aftermarket cats did you find that complied with CARB requirements?
There aren't any. I just have my fingers crossed. lol

However, the 200 cell cat that NP uses is CARB certified. But using the terminology "high flow" and "performance" in their product, it automatically disqualifies it from being usable.

I've retained my old cats in case they need to be changed out to pass. Every once in a while I do get a code, but it's irrelevant.

My logic is, how many smog techs are going to know the difference if they have to visually inspect? Probably none of them. And they're so tucked away that they're not easy to inspect. Add to that, the place I've been going for smog checks is the same place I've been going for 20 years. He won't fudge results, but I've never seen him inspect anything.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2012 | 03:00 PM
  #15  
DaveC's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 702
Likes: 133
From: Singapore
Default

What I thought. I think I'll stick with what I have for now.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 08:56 AM
  #16  
totalimmortal363's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 336
Likes: 36
From: Denver, CO
Default

Granted its not directly related but I passed emissions in CO with Magnaflow high flow cats in my Galant VR4, passed with flying colors come to think of it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 10:04 AM
  #17  
ccfulton's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 1,120
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default

When the engine is up to temp and running closed loop the cats shouldn't have all that much work to do anyway. Plus the comparison being made here is between a new high flow cat and an old low flow one that has been crudded up with who knows what over the years.

I'd expect that the lifespan of a high flow cat might be somewhat shorter since you are probably starting off further down in the acceptable emissions range, but that when new, they wouldn't be any worse than a middle aged stock one.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 11:33 AM
  #18  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 571
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Richboy47
You get a little noticeable pick up on the low end just because you have less restriction in the exhaust process.

I had always heard mixed things about what happens when you change exhaust restriction. I seemed to recall that reducing restriction actually REDUCED low end torque but that horsepower was increased at high rpms. Anybody else want to chime in about this?

Doug
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 01:17 PM
  #19  
totalimmortal363's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 336
Likes: 36
From: Denver, CO
Default

It's all over the map, each person I've encountered has had a different answer. In N/A cars, to my understanding, backpressure helps a little in low end torque but stifles high end power.

Turbocharged engines like as little backpressure as possible to help the turbo spool faster.

As far as S/C motors, I'm not sure of the general sentiment.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 04:27 PM
  #20  
NikasilNik's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 25
From: East Yorkshire UK
Default

I've been toying with the idea of leaving the front box and the two rear boxes in place but getting a pair of straight through pipes to replace the middle two boxes , thought it may increase the growl but without any boom or resonance , don't want the car noisy at cruising speeds though , any thoughts guys ? ,

All the best

NikasilNik
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.