Cylinder Bore Wear Limits???
#1
#3
#4
Bore measurements
OK...
So I took bore measurements using a dial bore gauge with a resolution of 0.0005". Six readings per hole, top/middle/bottom, parallel and perpendicular to the crank...
Data attached...
Also, I think my readings are a hair high... I rechecked my calibration afterwords and got a 0.0002"reading.. I'll do it again in in a bit...
Max wear is 0.0028", average appears to be around 0.0015"
Whadya guys think???
Thanks!
HS!
So I took bore measurements using a dial bore gauge with a resolution of 0.0005". Six readings per hole, top/middle/bottom, parallel and perpendicular to the crank...
Data attached...
Also, I think my readings are a hair high... I rechecked my calibration afterwords and got a 0.0002"reading.. I'll do it again in in a bit...
Max wear is 0.0028", average appears to be around 0.0015"
Whadya guys think???
Thanks!
HS!
#5
If you do not have it already, you should find the Jaguar Engine Repair Course Manual,
course #168. It has been posted here courtesy of MotorCarMan. For engine assembly,
it is much better than JTIS.
To give you an idea, the manual says that the pistons are select fit according
to the finished bore during initial assembly. The pistons come in three "grades",
each being 0.01mm bigger than the previous size.
No specific wear guidance, other than if the Nikasil bore is worn, the block
must be replaced.
course #168. It has been posted here courtesy of MotorCarMan. For engine assembly,
it is much better than JTIS.
To give you an idea, the manual says that the pistons are select fit according
to the finished bore during initial assembly. The pistons come in three "grades",
each being 0.01mm bigger than the previous size.
No specific wear guidance, other than if the Nikasil bore is worn, the block
must be replaced.
The following users liked this post:
motorcarman (04-13-2015)
#6
If you do not have it already, you should find the Jaguar Engine Repair Course Manual,
course #168. It has been posted here courtesy of MotorCarMan. For engine assembly,
it is much better than JTIS.
To give you an idea, the manual says that the pistons are select fit according
to the finished bore during initial assembly. The pistons come in three "grades",
each being 0.01mm bigger than the previous size.
No specific wear guidance, other than if the Nikasil bore is worn, the block
must be replaced.
course #168. It has been posted here courtesy of MotorCarMan. For engine assembly,
it is much better than JTIS.
To give you an idea, the manual says that the pistons are select fit according
to the finished bore during initial assembly. The pistons come in three "grades",
each being 0.01mm bigger than the previous size.
No specific wear guidance, other than if the Nikasil bore is worn, the block
must be replaced.
Found the 168 manual you were talking about, and yes... it is really good...
I guess it all comes down to whether or not the Nikasil coating has been compromised, not actual bore measurements like NORMAL engines!
I cannot find any areas of bore walls that are significantly different than others... mostly still cross hatched, with a few areas of "mirror smooth"...
There is no direct correlation between compression readings vs. bore measurements... One of the higher compression cylinders (165 lb) was actually the most worn... i.e. the 0.0028" over cyl...
It appears as though my engine build was with all #2 pistons. This gives me piston diameter, but not bore wear of course....
SO ...
Even though I have 100 high res pictures of bore walls... I'll go take another peek and make sure I don't see any "light grey" nikasil wear through... (there's not)
Heads are checked and perfect, decks are checked and perfect... Time to slap this baby back together...
Now back to my head gasket and bolt reconnaissance!
Thanks Again man...
Yer a lifesaver...
HS
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[MidAtlantic]: 1997 XJ6 VDP $3,900 - Very RARE Anthracite on Warm Charcoal
42Ajd
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
09-26-2015 07:04 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)