XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

The Results of the XK8 & XKR Hydraulic Hose & Equipment Evaluation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #21  
walt_00XKRConv's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 106
Likes: 43
From: Waynesboro, PA
Default Power-Packer Hose

Gus and I talked and neither of us has seen that type of hose. If all the hoses (lift and latch) are similar then it is probably an original. The 1/87 could be 1st Q of 87 which would kind of match up with your car date. 167/8 would also, where 167 is the 167th day of 1998, unless it is 2008.

The important part is 600bar burst. This is 8702psi and much better than any version of the Parker hose. That would explain why your hose is still intact. The Parker hose is using a fiber reinforcing layer that is not strong. Yours could have the wire mesh found in most hoses. Not sure but a good bet given the burst rating. Maybe they started out with the hose you have and switched to the Parker soon after. If it has made it this far I wouldn't change it.

The main issue for you will be cylinder seals.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #22  
H20boy's Avatar
Veteran member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,345
Likes: 1,165
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Default

Walt, you and gus are by far, the hydraulic top gurus. Thanks again for your help and advice on these parts.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #23  
mbalce's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 197
Likes: 39
From: Dickson, TN
Default

Originally Posted by walt_00XKRConv
Gus and I talked and neither of us has seen that type of hose. If all the hoses (lift and latch) are similar then it is probably an original. The 1/87 could be 1st Q of 87 which would kind of match up with your car date. 167/8 would also, where 167 is the 167th day of 1998, unless it is 2008.

The important part is 600bar burst. This is 8702psi and much better than any version of the Parker hose. That would explain why your hose is still intact. The Parker hose is using a fiber reinforcing layer that is not strong. Yours could have the wire mesh found in most hoses. Not sure but a good bet given the burst rating. Maybe they started out with the hose you have and switched to the Parker soon after. If it has made it this far I wouldn't change it.

The main issue for you will be cylinder seals.
Wow, I feel pretty fortunate - I would ask if anyone else has a circa 1999 that has these same hoses and they are still running but I guess if they had them and like mine, have not ever blown, they probably are not reading or caring about this thread....
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
qwakwak's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Capitola, Calif - beach town - sunny side of Monterey Bay
Default

Gus and Walt,

Your work on the hoses is really appreciated. I have a 98 XK8. The hoses are similiar to mbalce. My hoses are printed with "Power Packer 1/B/DN3 Max burst 600 bar - 96/8". So based on your comments to mbalce, am I correct in assuming my hoses are probably ok?

Walt how do I contact you to purchase one of the kits? You can email me at qwakwak@sbcglobal.net with the info.

Thanks for your efforts. So far I've gotten a new free throttle body and now it looks like I can save a lot of $$$ from a hose failure thanks to you guys.

Mick Routh
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #25  
walt_00XKRConv's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 106
Likes: 43
From: Waynesboro, PA
Default Good old hoses

It appears that the "Power-Packer" hose was used in the beginning. Gus and I haven't seen these because our focus has been on failed hoses. That hose was built to last. The really good hoses suffer from cost, size, and weight. I assume this is why Power-Packer went to the lighter hose. The car has 50-60 ft. of hose for the system.

I think it is OK to put this on this forum. I'll also email directly JIC.
www.lsi-controls.com/JagKit.htm
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #26  
K.Westra's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 311
From: Luverne, MN
Default

One question: Am I correct in assuming this will work with the older style hoses, it is just recommended to have the newer style? Right now my hoses are fine, so I do not particularly want to replace them (assuming I have them, I haven't looked yet) if I do not need to at this point.

If a group buy is in the works I would be 100% in on this. If no group buy happens I will wait until summer.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #27  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,236
From: Berlin Md.
Default

This valve works on the pump with any hose new or old. We feel that this reduction in operation pressure will dramatically reduce and in most cases eliminate the frequency of hose, latch and lift failures. Because we are unable to predict the life of the existing system in your car we are reluctant to say you will never have a leak. We are not suggesting that you replace your hose, latch or lift without reason. A failure or leak in your system would be reason to make repairs.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #28  
K.Westra's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 311
From: Luverne, MN
Default

Good. Exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for your work on this. I hope a group buy happens, but even if it doesn't, I will be doing this at some point.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #29  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,236
From: Berlin Md.
Default

For anyone who is interested I received a call from the manufacture of the replacement hose that is mentioned on my web page and he told me of a price reduction for the hose kit. That reduction will bring the price of the hose kit and fittings in line with what Jaguar was charging for just the hose set. This replacement hose will withstand any pressure this hyd pump has to offer.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #30  
hlgeorge's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 259
From: Atlanta, GA USA
Default

Gus, You should approach Jaguar with this solution and maybe you could become the Jaguar official supplier.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #31  
test point's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,116
From: Ellijay
Default

Why would Jaguar have an incentive to prevent top hose failures?

They have totally ignored the issue for 10 years even as they spent a great deal of money covering the replacements under warranty. To acknowledge a pressure reducing solution would mean accepting responsibility for all those failures paid for by their owners.
 

Last edited by test point; Oct 22, 2009 at 08:07 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #32  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,236
From: Berlin Md.
Default

I did all of this because I said I would. I spent a year on this project and the success was by the grace of the talented people that helped me. Why would I want to do anything for Jaguar, they did nothing for us………. If Jaguar owners want help in this area they can go to my page or your forum and get it. Again I am making noting on any of these items on my page!
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #33  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default Thx Gus. You have been a pitbull hanging on this fix

Hey Gus... Nice work... and to Walt as well. I have followed this hose problem for the last couple of years; and no one has been more persistent and thorough in researching a fix than you. The whole XK8 vert community owes you a big thanks on this project. Gordo
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #34  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,236
From: Berlin Md.
Default

Gordo,
It was you I made my commitment to and I did what I set out to do. It was doable only because of the talented people that worked with me on this project. I knew nothing about hydraulics and did not pretend I did. I am an enabler and the pros working with me made it happen.

Thank you for the kind comments, I direct them to the many people involved that made it happen. From the parts for testing and evaluation to the end results of a new hose and Walt’s pressure adjusting valve.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #35  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 573
From: Los Angeles
Default Post Experiences

As folks here buy this kit and go through the installations, how about posting the experience?

Just a suggestion.

Doug
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #36  
walt_00XKRConv's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 106
Likes: 43
From: Waynesboro, PA
Default Report your experience with kit install

That's a good idea so I can clean up the installation instructions. Gus has been the only test of the final version and he had one minor problem that was easily resolved and I changed the instructions to help. A fitting had to be moved so he could connect the one hose. I have the prototype in my car which is not as nice as the kit but works great. It is great to operate the top and not anticipate a disaster.

We have a number of orders back logged from all over the world. Parts are due in any day so we will start shipping them out ASAP. Everything is custom so it takes a little time to get that going.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #37  
H20boy's Avatar
Veteran member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,345
Likes: 1,165
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Default

congrats walt on the sales! Is Gus on your Christmas card list?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #38  
K.Westra's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 311
From: Luverne, MN
Default

So, do you think we can get enough interested to do a group buy? I would definitely be in.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #39  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 573
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by K.Westra
So, do you think we can get enough interested to do a group buy? I would definitely be in.

I had asked this early on as well and would absolutely add my name to the list. I believe the suppliers preferred to have a single location to ship to versus 25 different locations. I have seen group buys at other car forum websites and a single point of shipping was never a requirement. It seems that processing a quantity (10? 20? 25?) of orders at the same time should allow for some discount even if those orders had to be shipped to different locations. Just saying!

Doug
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #40  
ABorealis's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 6
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

Count me in for a group buy.

I'd host it but being in Canada would prove detrimental in added shipping costs for all.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.