XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

Wheel Width

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #1  
popodaddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Quartz Hill, CA
Default Wheel Width

Good Morning. I recently purchased a 2002 XK8 that has 18X9 wheels and 255/45 tires on both front and rear. Was this configuration available from the factory? Two of the wheels need to be replaced due to pitting so I'm wondering if I should buy 18X8s for the front or are the 9s acceptable.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 11:30 AM
  #2  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

A 255 crossection is OK on a 9" rim; but my question would be are you buying the wells used or new?

OEM wheels would cost a fortune. Have you researched having the wheels rebuilt/refinished. Most wheels can be repaired and repainted or rechromed for about half the cost of new wheels. I've had most done for around $125-150 per wheel.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 01:39 PM
  #3  
jagmon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: little rock, ar
Default

what brands and tires are the best for high speed touring?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

Look for the speed rating letter symbol on the tire you buy:

Beginning in 1991, the speed symbol denoting a fixed maximum speed capability of new tires must be shown only in the speed rating portion of the tire's service descriptions, maximum speeds and typical applications are shown below:

S 112 mph 180 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
T 118 mph 190 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
U 124 mph 200 km/h
H 130 mph 210 km/h Sport Sedans & Coupes
V 149 mph 240 km/h Sport Sedans, Coupes & Sports Cars

When Z-speed rated tires were first introduced, they were thought to reflect the highest tire speed rating that would ever be required, in excess of 240 km/h or 149 mph. While Z-speed rated tires are capable of speeds in excess of 149 mph, how far above 149 mph was not identified. That ultimately caused the automotive industry to add W- and Y-speed ratings to identify the tires that meet the needs of new vehicles that have extremely high top-speed capabilities.

W 168 mph 270 km/h Exotic Sports Cars
Y 186 mph 300 km/h Exotic Sports Cars
 

Last edited by GordoCatCar; Mar 11, 2012 at 02:00 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 07:19 PM
  #5  
Kevin D's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 811
Likes: 127
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Well, mine are in the Y category, and I SERIOUSLY doubt that I will ever get up to 186 mph unless I drive over a cliff, and then the tires won't matter anyway, will they?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

May as well go out in style....
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 05:08 AM
  #7  
Dennis07's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 448
From: New Jersey
Default

You all have reminded me of questions I've been meaning to pursue but never got around to. Here goes:

- My '01 came with 245/45 tires up front, and 255/45 on the rear. That's a width difference of 10 mm, or less than 1/2".

- Are the front and rear wheels different? (These wheels are the "impeller" variety. Looks to me like there is a different part number, but I've got a pretty fuzzy copy of a parts list.)

- Any problem with running a common size front and rear? 255s preferred, I think, since otherwise a speedo error is possible (the two sizes having, in theory, a different outside diameter). I do not drive the car near its limits.

TIA for any advice.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 05:31 AM
  #8  
GGG's Avatar
GGG
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 120,439
Likes: 17,004
From: Durham, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis07
You all have reminded me of questions I've been meaning to pursue but never got around to. Here goes:

- My '01 came with 245/45 tires up front, and 255/45 on the rear. That's a width difference of 10 mm, or less than 1/2".

- Are the front and rear wheels different? (These wheels are the "impeller" variety. Looks to me like there is a different part number, but I've got a pretty fuzzy copy of a parts list.)

- Any problem with running a common size front and rear? 255s preferred, I think, since otherwise a speedo error is possible (the two sizes having, in theory, a different outside diameter). I do not drive the car near its limits.

TIA for any advice.
Dennis,

My 2001 XK8 came with Impeller wheels and the same tyre size combination as yours.

The front and rear rims were different sizes:

Front: 8.5 x 18
Rear: 9 x 18

Graham
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 11:05 AM
  #9  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

I would run mfr spec tire sizes on a staggered setup like this. it is nice to be able to rotate front to rear, but if you have different width sized rims, IMO that precludes four way rotation.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 12:17 PM
  #10  
Skid Mark's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 29
From: Mid Atlantis
Default

Originally Posted by GordoCatCar
Look for the speed rating letter symbol on the tire you buy:

Beginning in 1991, the speed symbol denoting a fixed maximum speed capability of new tires must be shown only in the speed rating portion of the tire's service descriptions, maximum speeds and typical applications are shown below:

S 112 mph 180 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
T 118 mph 190 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
U 124 mph 200 km/h
H 130 mph 210 km/h Sport Sedans & Coupes
V 149 mph 240 km/h Sport Sedans, Coupes & Sports Cars

When Z-speed rated tires were first introduced, they were thought to reflect the highest tire speed rating that would ever be required, in excess of 240 km/h or 149 mph. While Z-speed rated tires are capable of speeds in excess of 149 mph, how far above 149 mph was not identified. That ultimately caused the automotive industry to add W- and Y-speed ratings to identify the tires that meet the needs of new vehicles that have extremely high top-speed capabilities.

W 168 mph 270 km/h Exotic Sports Cars
Y 186 mph 300 km/h Exotic Sports Cars
Doesn't the speed rating also take into account the type suspension a car is likely to have? The higher speed rated tires supposedly can tolerate the stresses of higher performance suspensions as well? I was told this by a tire salesman, which is why I'm asking.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #11  
GordoCatCar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 494
From: Ormond Beach FL
Default

Obviously, any car capable of going over 150 mph is going to have a fairly sophisticated suspension which at or near the limit is going to stress tires along with all parts of the suspension.

However, I am pretty sure that tires are speed rated by a machine... not on a car.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 03:28 PM
  #12  
pomosv's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 355
Likes: 112
From: Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by popodaddy
Good Morning. I recently purchased a 2002 XK8 that has 18X9 wheels and 255/45 tires on both front and rear. Was this configuration available from the factory? Two of the wheels need to be replaced due to pitting so I'm wondering if I should buy 18X8s for the front or are the 9s acceptable.
9's up front are acceptable. I run the stock 18x8's up front with a 1'' spacer without issues. Would be nice too since now you can rotate!
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #13  
Dennis07's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 448
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by GordoCatCar
I would run mfr spec tire sizes on a staggered setup like this. it is nice to be able to rotate front to rear, but if you have different width sized rims, IMO that precludes four way rotation.
I'm sure you're right. Anyway I'm probably working this problem the wrong way.

My real problem is that when I shop all-season tires for my '01, seems all that comes up are Michelin PS. These are crazy expensive for the performance and the tread life (low-to-mid 20s) they give.

So I should probably ask: anybody got an all-season tire recommendation for this 245 / 255 combination?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 10:18 PM
  #14  
H20boy's Avatar
Veteran member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,344
Likes: 1,163
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Default

did a quick search on Tire Rack (one of our fine forum sponsors)

Tire Search Results


Try the hancooks, good reviews, check out the car & driver video comparisons
 

Last edited by H20boy; Mar 13, 2012 at 10:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2012 | 05:16 AM
  #15  
Dennis07's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 448
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by H20boy
did a quick search on Tire Rack (one of our fine forum sponsors)

Tire Search Results


Try the hancooks, good reviews, check out the car & driver video comparisons
Thanks, Matt. Applying the all-season-only filter, as I must, knocks out most candidates, but we still have 11 ...

Search #2

I should have mentioned that I had also disqualified options like P-ZEROs, which I just don't like.

The Hankooks in this list seem to have gotten beaten up some in the ratings. Anyone had experience with these, or maybe with the Conti's?
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2012 | 08:40 AM
  #16  
Paul Pavlik's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 434
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

I use Bridgestone Turanza LSVs on my Everyday Car (Acura CL Coupe) and am VERY Pleased with them.

The current equivalent for the Jag is the Turanza Serenity Grand Touring All Season.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 12:25 AM
  #17  
H20boy's Avatar
Veteran member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,344
Likes: 1,163
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Default

I really like my hancooks, though a different model from the all-season. I think you'll find a few that love each brand, and a few who don't. The kumho's got stellar review in that video too. Then the p-zero - everyone doesn't like those, the only one in overwhelming agreement from members.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 07:36 AM
  #18  
Dennis07's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 448
From: New Jersey
Default

Thanks, Paul
Thanks, Matt

Yikes, some of these prices! I guess I better just get used to it.

I'm thinking the Turanzas, being GT tires, woul probably give a lot better tread life than the Pilots, those being "Ultra High Performance", which I am not.

So I think those and the Hankooks go to the top of the candidate list for more research.

At the rate rubber is disappearing from my Pilots, I better get on this.

[edit] Oops, forgot, the Conti's: anyone had experience with those?
 

Last edited by Dennis07; Mar 15, 2012 at 07:39 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #19  
resneed's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Default

After reading some posts on tire sizes, etc. on the forum a couple of weeks ago I took a closer look on my 2005 XK8 that I got 3 months ago. Had one brand on front, different brand on rear, all 245-45-18, slow leak on right rear. Measured the width of the rims and 2 were 8" and 2 were 9"... both of the wider rims were on right side. After researching tires decided to go with the staggered sizes and ordered Bridgestone Potenza RE970's which had some excellent reviews... as did several others. Will be getting them mounted tomorrow. Obviously PO had same sizes so he could rotate but never realized rims were different widths... surprised tire dealer/installer didn't notice???
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #20  
H20boy's Avatar
Veteran member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,344
Likes: 1,163
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Default

resneed, you wouldn't be the first to have to 'fix' the staggered wheel mishap (from experience). I'm sure that item isn't on the dealer checklist and its not blatantly obvious unless you really look at the front or rear head-on, and even then, it may not be obvious to the naked eye. I doubt I could spot it when told to look for it now.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
H20boy
XJ ( X351 )
72
Dec 24, 2024 03:23 PM
PMKimpton
X-Type ( X400 )
15
Aug 3, 2019 08:22 PM
scooternva
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
19
Oct 27, 2015 02:14 PM
DustysSon
X-Type ( X400 )
1
Sep 13, 2015 04:17 AM
lickahotskillet
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
0
Sep 11, 2015 07:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM.