MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Vacuum source for MK2 Audiovox Cruise Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-25-2016, 03:40 PM
MK2's Avatar
MK2
MK2 is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 595
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
Default Vacuum source for MK2 Audiovox Cruise Control

I am installing an Audiovox cruise control (Rostra) in my 64 MK2 3.8 MOD. I need a vacuum source for the servo. The instructions advise against putting a "T" in the vacuum line for the brake servo. Can anyone give me an idea on what I should do about a vacuum connection?

Thanks.

Lin
 
  #2  
Old 09-25-2016, 09:41 PM
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Posts: 1,660
Received 671 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

Does it matter, the brake servo has its reservoir _ should be plenty of vacuum ?
How big is the port on the cruise control, if it's small it won't matter.

Plus the fact there is no other vacuum port on the manifold anyway _ not that I can remember.
I just bolted mine back on, and the only one is for the brake servo.
 

Last edited by JeffR1; 09-25-2016 at 09:50 PM.
  #3  
Old 09-26-2016, 05:16 AM
MK2's Avatar
MK2
MK2 is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 595
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I don't know why the instructions with the kit say to not use the vacuum line for the brake servo.
Lin
 
  #4  
Old 09-26-2016, 10:55 AM
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Posts: 1,660
Received 671 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

Hook it up with a "T" and if it work, great, if it doesn't you'll have to make your own port.
1/8 pipe thread fitting works well, if you don't mind making a small hole in the manifold. Probably at the other end somewhere, but you will have to be carful of the water jacket _ that would be the tricky part.

Best just use a "T"...
In a moderen car where there is no reservoir, it may be an issue.
They also may be just covering the liability issue of someone messing with the brake system on a car.
 
The following users liked this post:
MK2 (09-26-2016)
  #5  
Old 09-26-2016, 06:16 PM
MK2's Avatar
MK2
MK2 is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 595
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I will give it a try, but it will be a while before I can test it.
Lin
 
  #6  
Old 09-27-2016, 10:18 AM
csbush's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 809
Received 223 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

My '60 has a vacuum line coming off the carbs that does the vacuum advance for the distributor- not sure what the '64 used...
That could be an option though.
 
  #7  
Old 09-27-2016, 01:41 PM
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Posts: 1,660
Received 671 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

Probably not a good idea there, as a vacuum change in that area will effect the carb directly.
That vacuum port is there intentionally to effect the vacuum advance in the distributor directly as the butter valves are opened and closed.
If the cruise control port was fed off of that area, the vacuum advance would not work properly.
 
  #8  
Old 09-27-2016, 02:01 PM
MK2's Avatar
MK2
MK2 is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 595
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

As Mike Eck pointed out to me when I was wondering about using the carb vacuum port, that port has no vacuum at idle. I really hate to violate the directions that came with the cruise control, but I guess that I will.

Lin
 
  #9  
Old 09-27-2016, 06:32 PM
Doug Dooren's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Avon, Connecticut USA
Posts: 468
Received 159 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Lin, I assume the reason for not tapping the brake vacuum reservoir is safety (and lawyers) - thinking the cruise will require the greatest vacuum for open throttle, when manifold vacuum is lowest - possibility of drawing from the reservoir? As Jeff notes it's hard to imagine exceeding that tank's capacity to drive the cruise servo. Is the motor assembled yet? Even if so it's simple enough to pull the intake manifold and add a tap if you're concerned - nothing wrong with doing it right.
 
  #10  
Old 10-30-2016, 04:03 AM
Homersimpson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 632
Received 311 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Hi,

I know this thread is a month old now so the OP has probably installed the system already, however, if not it occurred to me that the S-Type uses vacuum for the heater valve and scuttle vent.

When I restored one years ago I remember that it has a small tank under the n/s wing for this which was connected to the larger tank under the o/s wing (note that i'm in the UK so this will be the other way around in the USA).

If I remember correctly the small tank served the scuttle vent and heater valve. Might be possible to use the same system and components for the OP purpose.

Hope this is of help.
 
The following users liked this post:
MK2 (10-30-2016)
  #11  
Old 10-30-2016, 05:32 AM
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Posts: 1,660
Received 671 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

That would probably work well, but the OP has a Mark 2 and unfortunately the scuttle vent is not vacuum operated on a Mark 2.
Do you have an S-Type, where is the vacuum port on the intake manifold tapped off of for the scuttle ?
 
The following users liked this post:
MK2 (10-30-2016)
  #12  
Old 10-30-2016, 03:29 PM
MK2's Avatar
MK2
MK2 is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 595
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses. I have now discovered that Rostra makes an electronic servo/controller that does not require vacuum, so I am now going that route.
Lin
 
  #13  
Old 10-30-2016, 04:48 PM
Homersimpson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 632
Received 311 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JeffR1
That would probably work well, but the OP has a Mark 2 and unfortunately the scuttle vent is not vacuum operated on a Mark 2.
Do you have an S-Type, where is the vacuum port on the intake manifold tapped off of for the scuttle ?
I see that the OP has replied and has found another way to achieve this, for reference I was suggesting that the OP could use the S-Type setup on their MK2.

Having looked at the SNG barratt website to remind myself it appears that the S-Type has T Piece in the line, please see below link.

SNG Barratt - The Ultimate Jaguar Parts Specialist

This then feeds a little reservor under the wing on the other side from the servo which can be seen here.

SNG Barratt - The Ultimate Jaguar Parts Specialist

If it was good enough for Jaguar to install a T Piece then it should be good enough for us!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bpb99
E type ( XK-E )
4
10-27-2016 03:55 PM
TJChid
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
10-17-2016 05:45 AM
Homersimpson
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
2
09-26-2016 04:01 PM
Peter w
XJS ( X27 )
3
09-21-2016 08:31 PM
06-XJR
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
10
09-19-2016 07:47 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Vacuum source for MK2 Audiovox Cruise Control



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.