F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Definitive Scientific Study of Spoiler Effect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-02-2018, 04:34 PM
fujicoupe's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,506
Received 424 Likes on 291 Posts
Default Definitive Scientific Study of Spoiler Effect

On the round trip to and from the dealer today I monitored the MPG instant readout for approximately 20 miles with the spoiler deployed and 20 miles with it retracted, all the time with the cruise control set at 71 MPH and the car in dynamic mode without the sport function selected. (Funny thing is my spoiler doesn't deploy until the speedo reaches 72). Anyway, the road (not less) traveled is entirely at sea level and no elevation changes are encountered except for the occasional bridge, so I would conclude that the results are beyond question and can be deemed settled science.
With spoiler retracted, MPG fluctuated between 29 and 32, mostly toward 29 and 30;
With spoiler deployed MPG fluctuated between 29 and 33, but tended predominantly upwards of 30.
This is exactly the opposite of what I expected and means absolutely nothing of consequence.
Thus, I will proceed no further down this road less traveled and conclude with my apologies to M. Scott, may he RIP.
 
The following users liked this post:
Uncle Fishbits (09-24-2021)
  #2  
Old 08-02-2018, 06:07 PM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 477
Received 128 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Interesting. Allowing for all the little variables not accounted for, I'd call this pretty much a wash.
 
  #3  
Old 08-02-2018, 06:13 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

The spoiler effect is minimal (at best) at 70MPH. When speaking with the JLR folks, i was told that the benefits begin at 90MPH. i have a feeling that testing at 90MPH may show increased fuel consumption.
 
  #4  
Old 08-02-2018, 07:05 PM
pdupler's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 2,084
Received 1,057 Likes on 673 Posts
Default

I remember reading an article in one of the major car magazines back in the late 80s while sitting in a doctor's waiting room. It was about the trend at the time of manufacturers offering optional rear spoilers on just about everything. The magazine tested the effects of rear spoilers on a half dozen new model cars and I remember the definitive conclusion: "There was no place within the United States where it was legal to drive anywhere close to fast enough to get any appreciable performance benefit from an optional rear spoiler." They determined that you had to be going 80 to 120 mph before they could get any measurable downforce on the rear wheels and even at the car's top speeds (it was the 80s after all), the effects were negligible.
 
  #5  
Old 08-02-2018, 07:36 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Some may recall the Chrysler crossfire Coupe. It had a strikingly similar spoiler. If the spoiler did not deploy it caused a speed limiter to kick in. On that car it was determined that it was critical for car stability at higher speeds
 
  #6  
Old 08-02-2018, 08:46 PM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,364
Received 954 Likes on 715 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
Some may recall the Chrysler crossfire Coupe. It had a strikingly similar spoiler. If the spoiler did not deploy it caused a speed limiter to kick in. On that car it was determined that it was critical for car stability at higher speeds
It was also a similar body shape. Also recall the Audi TT recall, where the previously optional rear spoiler was retrofitted to improve stability at high speeds. The spoiler was only part of it, but the reacall notes the issue is " AT SPEEDS SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE POSTED SPEED LIMITS".

At what speed does the F-Type start complaining if the spoiler is disabled? I suspect that's the speed at which it starts being effective.
 
  #7  
Old 08-02-2018, 08:59 PM
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,303
Received 3,126 Likes on 2,304 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lizzardo
It was also a similar body shape. Also recall the Audi TT recall, where the previously optional rear spoiler was retrofitted to improve stability at high speeds. The spoiler was only part of it, but the reacall notes the issue is " AT SPEEDS SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE POSTED SPEED LIMITS".

At what speed does the F-Type start complaining if the spoiler is disabled? I suspect that's the speed at which it starts being effective.
At 100 mph (160 km/h) I get the warning message "spoiler inoperative".
But I posted somewhere else about an Oz recall saying something about the spoiler needing to be up at 123 mph or thereabouts (I can't remember the exact figure ATM).
 
  #8  
Old 08-02-2018, 09:18 PM
vettegood's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Paradise Valley, Ariz
Posts: 604
Received 198 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Hello all,
just the other day I was driving highway and my dash light kept flicking that my trunk was open, I was going between 85 and 95 MPH.

My question is if the spoiler is there to add stability to the rear end of the car at fast speeds by putting downward pressure on the wheels as road force weight, then why would it not keep the trunk lid pushed down so the lid would not flicker the whole trip being open. When I finally did stop and checked the trunk lid it was not even like the lid was not latched it was latched but not locked down tight (latched, the lid would not open up farther without pushing the button to open).

I would think if the spoiler was designed to put downward force on the rear end of the car it would be able to exert enough downward pressure to keep the trunk lid down.!

Makes me wonder how effective the spoiler really is, other than a cool looking piece of useless metal artwork!
Just saying...
Happy Motoring...
 
  #9  
Old 08-03-2018, 12:35 AM
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,100
Received 337 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

The spoiler on the F-type does not create downforce. It reduces the lift created by the car's shape when speed is high enough.

The spoiler works exactly in the same way as a spoiler on the top of an airplane wing. The spolier is also called a "lift dumper", and makes shure the wings lift is reduced just after touching down when landing.

Can be seen at 1:20 in this video:

"Spoiler or lift dumper is a device intended to reduce lift in an aircraft. Spoilers are on the top surface of a wing which can be extended upward into the airflow and spoil it. Spoilers reduce lift as well as increasing drag."
 

Last edited by Arne; 08-03-2018 at 12:56 AM.
The following users liked this post:
dmchao (08-03-2018)
  #10  
Old 08-03-2018, 01:56 AM
Kdes's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

This jaguar link (last FAQ) refers to a wing on the SVR Compared “spoiler” on the other models.

https://www.jaguar.co.uk/about-jagua...ftype-svr.html


Also a direct quote from the jaguar brochure (2016 Coupe) -
“a deployable rear spoiler rises at higher speeds to reduce lift by up to 264 lbs”


And also found this (again another direct paste from jaguar brochure) -

AERODYNAMIC SPOILER
The aerodynamic spoiler is integral to the enhanced performance of the F-TYPE SVR. Compared with the standard F-TYPE Coupe rear spoiler, the F-TYPE SVR produces more downforce but crucially less drag. The active spoiler is more elevated and wider than the standard F-TYPE Coupe spoiler, enabling it to act over the whole width of the car.

Air passes both over and under the spoiler, allowing Bernoulli's principle to act in the car's favor, faster moving air underneath the spoiler is at a lower pressure than that passing over the top, resulting in additional downforce.

The F-TYPE SVR spoiler operates in two different positions:
On the Coupe the aerodynamic spoiler deploys at 70 mph and stores at 50 mph
On the Convertible the aerodynamic spoiler deploys at 60 mph and stores at 40 mph

DEPLOYED SPOILER
When the F-TYPE SVR spoiler is deployed it increases downforce for greater stability and improved handling at top speed. In this position the spoiler gives a drag coefficient reduction of 2.5 percent and a lift coefficient reduction of 15 percent.

STORED SPOILER
For maximum top speed (V-Max), the spoiler is stored to reduce drag. It works in conjunction with the front spoiler and other aerodynamic enhancements to bring a drag coefficient improvement of 7.5 percent and lift coefficient reduction of 45 percent.

V-MAX
In order to achieve 200 mph†*3 you must consciously prepare your F-TYPE SVR. Select 'Dynamic Mode' and press the deployable aerodynamic spoiler switch for 3 seconds to enable V-Max Mode. While active, a permanent symbol appears on the instrument cluster. In this mode the spoiler remains stored at all speeds keeping drag to a minimum.

REAR UNDERFLOOR AND DIFFUSER
The smooth rear underfloor reduces drag, while the rear diffuser works with the rear underfloor to manage airflow, adding to the stability of the F-TYPE SVR.


BROCHURE LINK - https://images.jazelc.com/uploads/ga...m97-366026.pdf
 

Last edited by Kdes; 08-03-2018 at 02:40 AM.
  #11  
Old 08-03-2018, 11:26 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,636 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fujicoupe
On the round trip to and from the dealer today I monitored the MPG instant readout for approximately 20 miles with the spoiler deployed and 20 miles with it retracted, all the time with the cruise control set at 71 MPH and the car in dynamic mode without the sport function selected. (Funny thing is my spoiler doesn't deploy until the speedo reaches 72). Anyway, the road (not less) traveled is entirely at sea level and no elevation changes are encountered except for the occasional bridge, so I would conclude that the results are beyond question and can be deemed settled science.
With spoiler retracted, MPG fluctuated between 29 and 32, mostly toward 29 and 30;
With spoiler deployed MPG fluctuated between 29 and 33, but tended predominantly upwards of 30.
This is exactly the opposite of what I expected and means absolutely nothing of consequence.
Thus, I will proceed no further down this road less traveled and conclude with my apologies to M. Scott, may he RIP.
with a classical education in fluid dynamics, this is exactly what I would have expected. The whole point of a spoiler is to spoil the laminar flow that will create lift upwards and drag across the rear bumper.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 08-03-2018 at 11:37 AM.
  #12  
Old 08-03-2018, 01:29 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

There is this misconception that spoiler and wings work by being pressed down from the air while the real factor is the pull effect instead. For an airplane wing, the upwards force is NOT from the air compressed below the wing but by the lift on the upside, reverse that on a car spoiler. Think of suction rather than compression. Arne is right on target.
A properly fitted front splitter diverts the ai from going under the car (and Jaguar should have larger hood vents to evacuate the air from the front grille), Aston has that right.
 

Last edited by FType17; 08-03-2018 at 03:08 PM.
  #13  
Old 08-03-2018, 03:00 PM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,140 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Does any of it matter at below 200km/h?
 
  #14  
Old 08-03-2018, 03:10 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
Does any of it matter at below 200km/h?
Certainly, above 90MPH (145KMH) the effect is there and gos up with speed
 
  #15  
Old 08-03-2018, 03:13 PM
NavyBlue's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 507
Received 131 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

"Sorry, Officer. The reason I'm going 100+ mph is that I'm making my car much safer by deploying the spoiler's downforce...."
 
  #16  
Old 08-03-2018, 06:19 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NavyBlue
"Sorry, Officer. The reason I'm going 100+ mph is that I'm making my car much safer by deploying the spoiler's downforce...."

I will try it next time as long as I know that a collection is setup for my bail/bond LOL
 
  #17  
Old 08-03-2018, 06:21 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

All kidding aside, while it feels planted at 160ish, by 180 is already getting floaty. I have a dashcam video somewhere that shows from firm and glued to a tad of lift
 
  #18  
Old 08-03-2018, 07:09 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

You can see here, this is a 75-80MPH to 180MPH run, a bridge gap is enough to disturb the stability

 
  #19  
Old 08-03-2018, 09:35 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,636 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
There is this misconception that spoiler and wings work by being pressed down from the air while the real factor is the pull effect instead. For an airplane wing, the upwards force is NOT from the air compressed below the wing but by the lift on the upside, reverse that on a car spoiler. Think of suction rather than compression. Arne is right on target.
A properly fitted front splitter diverts the ai from going under the car (and Jaguar should have larger hood vents to evacuate the air from the front grille), Aston has that right.
+1. But rather:” reverse that on a car wing”.
 
The following users liked this post:
FType17 (08-03-2018)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bluebird
F-Type ( X152 )
10
10-10-2014 12:55 AM
rscultho
XK / XKR ( X150 )
16
04-12-2012 03:24 AM
pmcmillan3698
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
1
03-20-2009 08:56 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Definitive Scientific Study of Spoiler Effect



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.