F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Does anyone know if the Eventuri intake is legit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 03:07 PM
  #1  
doctordeuce's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 22
From: Chicago, IL
Default Does anyone know if the Eventuri intake is legit?

They claim 30-38HP and 20-35 ft-lbs as a stand alone mod. I would love to know if anyone has installed of has any info of them. Price seems pretty insane for an intake at just under 2k!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 04:20 PM
  #2  
deltagroup's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 97
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

I've noticed the Audi and BMW communities testing the Eventuri intake on various RS5's, M5's and M3's with apparently "not bad" results. Jaguar F Type | Eventuri

Whether their claim of 30-38HP and 20-35 ft-lbs for the F-Type (5.0?) can be supported by others though--I'm doubtful at this point. Just a few too many past claims that a free-flowing intake will add this and that. That said, their "velocity stack" design is an interesting take on air flow for a MAF-controlled car. So, I'm open to enlightenment as you are. Technology | Eventuri
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 08:21 AM
  #3  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

I'm curious myself. If it really gives those kind of gains on the V6 even at that price I might be interested.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 08:37 AM
  #4  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
I'm curious myself. If it really gives those kind of gains on the V6 even at that price I might be interested.
That would be a 10% power increase in the V6, which isn't going to happen no matter how much better it flows. I also doubt those gains are possible on the V8.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 08:38 AM
  #5  
Grumpy Finn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 146
Likes: 38
From: SE Florida
Default

I saw the same set up for a Porsche 928 a long time ago, came with two electric inline fans to boost air intake and claimed to add 30-50 hp..... So they still claim that two tubes and new air filters give you all that? Why not just change your existing filters to K&N, pretty much the same deal?
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
ShaunPA's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 683
Likes: 123
From: Philadelphia
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
That would be a 10% power increase in the V6, which isn't going to happen no matter how much better it flows. I also doubt those gains are possible on the V8.
+1
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 11:58 AM
  #7  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

And $2,000 for CF components that can't be seen from any angle without disassembling the inner fenders.......
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 01:03 PM
  #8  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

Unhingd have you or are you going to do anything to your air intake system? I know you already did a pulley swap and a tune so just curious if your going to mess with the air intake at all. Seems like the Eventuri air intake is one of the few choices right now if you want to modify the air intake on these cars. It might not even be worth the money and effort though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 01:37 PM
  #9  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
Unhingd have you or are you going to do anything to your air intake system? I know you already did a pulley swap and a tune so just curious if your going to mess with the air intake at all. Seems like the Eventuri air intake is one of the few choices right now if you want to modify the air intake on these cars. It might not even be worth the money and effort though.
Given the limited space within an engine compartment these days, more airflow means more dust fines making it to the pistons. Over a distance of 100k+ miles, that will cause excessive wear. Of course, if you have a space the size of a refrigerator and can build a cyclone separator in conjunction with large radius bend air tubes, you might be able to increase airflow with full filtration. If you flip your cars every 2 or 3 years, no problem with the "free-flow" filtration systems. For track purposes, I never ran with an air filter except at dusty tracks in the desert. The bearings would always need replacing and the reciprocating components magnafluxed for impending stress failure long before the rings and cylinder walls succumbed to wear. But if you want an engine to last, you go for the filtration, not the last couple of horses. That said, if you could fit larger air boxes to house filter elements with substantially greater filtration surface, that would be worth looking into.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; Feb 15, 2016 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #10  
ss23's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 41
Default

My local tuner had just installed an Eventuri intake for an Audi RS5 last time I was there. He was amazed because the intake actually increased outputs by more than what they promised on their website (measured with a maha dyno).

I'll probably get it installed as well once I've upgraded the upper pulley and gotten a good ECU tune on my V6 base.

My 2 cents....
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

Thanks for the input Unhingd.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 09:54 AM
  #12  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

Anybody know of anyone on here who's installed this intake on there F Type? I would hate to be the guinea pig at almost $2000 lol.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 11:18 AM
  #13  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
Anybody know of anyone on here who's installed this intake on there F Type? I would hate to be the guinea pig at almost $2000 lol.
+1
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 02:35 PM
  #14  
ckosiek's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 28
Likes: 4
From: Delaware
Default

 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 02:48 PM
  #15  
CaptainHam's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 326
Likes: 57
From: SW London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
Anybody know of anyone on here who's installed this intake on there F Type? I would hate to be the guinea pig at almost $2000 lol.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...8/#post1317148
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 03:00 PM
  #16  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

Thanks for the link CaptainHam but I already read up on that one the other day. I emailed the one guy(Jgaxkr) that I know who has installed the Eventuri intake asking him what he thought about it but no response just yet.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 03:13 PM
  #17  
Atomic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 142
Likes: 30
From: Lakewood
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Given the limited space within an engine compartment these days, more airflow means more dust fines making it to the pistons. Over a distance of 100k+ miles, that will cause excessive wear. Of course, if you have a space the size of a refrigerator and can build a cyclone separator in conjunction with large radius bend air tubes, you might be able to increase airflow with full filtration. If you flip your cars every 2 or 3 years, no problem with the "free-flow" filtration systems. For track purposes, I never ran with an air filter except at dusty tracks in the desert. The bearings would always need replacing and the reciprocating components magnafluxed for impending stress failure long before the rings and cylinder walls succumbed to wear. But if you want an engine to last, you go for the filtration, not the last couple of horses. That said, if you could fit larger air boxes to house filter elements with substantially greater filtration surface, that would be worth looking into.

I'm curious how those filters would react in the real world being located so close to the brake discs. With the amount of brake dust these cars shed, I can see completely fouled filters happening in a matter of weeks, if not sooner.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 03:23 PM
  #18  
CaptainHam's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 326
Likes: 57
From: SW London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
Thanks for the link CaptainHam but I already read up on that one the other day. I emailed the one guy(Jgaxkr) that I know who has installed the Eventuri intake asking him what he thought about it but no response just yet.
Far from conclusive I know but it's also mentioned very briefly here (scroll to last post on page 2).

Hi all. - Jaguar F-Type Forums - Page 2
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2016 | 07:42 AM
  #19  
JgaXkr's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 283
From: Boston Mass
Default

Originally Posted by strippersteel
Thanks for the link CaptainHam but I already read up on that one the other day. I emailed the one guy(Jgaxkr) that I know who has installed the Eventuri intake asking him what he thought about it but no response just yet.
I installed my Eventuri intakes just after taking delivery of the car. My wife drove it home & backed it into the garage. I had the intakes installed before she drove it again. It is her daily driver not mine. So I am unable to tell you if it seems any faster. If it was my daily driver it would have one of my pulleys & a RICA tune as well. I will say the supercharger whine is now much more pronounced at light throttle.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2016 | 07:50 AM
  #20  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,523
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

My 2 cents, for what it's worth...

The intakes on the V6 are the same as the V8, so if the stock intakes are "adequate" on the V8 then they are already going to be oversized on the V6, purely based on the difference in air consumption of a 5.0L V8 consuming 550hp of air, compared to a 3.0L V6 consuming 380hp of air (rough numbers for the sake of argument).

So i'd be very surprised if these intakes could make any significant improvement to the V6.

Sure would be nice to see an independent dyno before & after on a V8, or even a V6, but as you can tell I have my doubts about the gains on the V6 being anywhere near the numbers they claim for the V8, in raw numbers or percentage.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.