F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F-Type 2+2 ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-28-2016, 09:48 PM
Smoke Em's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 818
Received 95 Likes on 84 Posts
Default F-Type 2+2 ???

Came across the article below that Jaguar is going through some changes. Looking at electric cars and also changing the F-Type to a roomier 2+2..

Jaguar Gives Up on the C-X75 to Build Electric Cars
 
The following users liked this post:
schraderade (07-29-2016)
  #2  
Old 07-29-2016, 12:14 AM
meefer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: OC, CA, USA
Posts: 156
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

So ruin the F-type while injecting its personality into all the other models. And I thought the changes for 2018MY were bad.......
 
The following 2 users liked this post by meefer:
Burt Gummer (07-29-2016), slojotaa (07-29-2016)
  #3  
Old 07-29-2016, 12:38 AM
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,112
Received 401 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting this. I've seen this rumor before (2 years ago, more conjecturally).

I really hope they don't do this. The XK is a beautiful GT design and jaguar really has an opportunity to make a great 2+2 by starting with brand new lines. They can share drive train with the F-Type if they want to save money but overextending the F-Type (literally!!) really dilutes the spirit and personality of the model I think.
 
The following users liked this post:
slojotaa (07-29-2016)
  #4  
Old 07-29-2016, 12:55 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 2,813
Received 675 Likes on 488 Posts
Default

When they created the 2+2 E-Type they destroyed that car. Damn thing still looks pregnant. Not that it has to look ugly but agree they likely should approach a 2+2 fresh.
 
  #5  
Old 07-29-2016, 08:45 PM
Bushwhacker's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 103
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by enderle
When they created the 2+2 E-Type they destroyed that car. Damn thing still looks pregnant. Not that it has to look ugly but agree they likely should approach a 2+2 fresh.
+1
 
  #6  
Old 07-29-2016, 09:04 PM
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,978
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,412 Posts
Default

Ditto the original 280Z and then the 280Z 2+2, destroyed the beautiful roofline.
 
  #7  
Old 07-30-2016, 04:58 AM
AnD3rew's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 952
Received 172 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Yes, if they want to an update they should use the platform but call it XK and make it different enough to look like a different model.
 
  #8  
Old 07-30-2016, 06:00 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,640 Likes on 3,362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tberg
Ditto the original 280Z and then the 280Z 2+2, destroyed the beautiful roofline.
+1.

Originally Posted by AnD3rew
Yes, if they want to an update they should use the platform but call it XK and make it different enough to look like a different model.
+1.
 
  #9  
Old 07-31-2016, 10:39 AM
2010 Kyanite XFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,640
Received 426 Likes on 306 Posts
Default

They could make the F-TYPE look like a Panamera, with plenty of rear head room. Ha! I don't care how nice of a car the Panamera is, it's just too damn ugly.

Now something like an Aston Rapide might work...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bcaez Rmxuzz
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
07-02-2016 05:31 PM
Billy Syeon Harsh
X-Type ( X400 )
2
04-11-2016 07:31 PM
Nati
F-Type ( X152 )
3
04-05-2016 10:20 AM
XXCalibar
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
1
03-29-2016 05:20 PM
Uncle Fishbits
F-Type ( X152 )
2
03-24-2016 06:20 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: F-Type 2+2 ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.