F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Latest Dyno 638 BHP (554 WHP)/520 FT-LBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-12-2019, 11:44 AM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default Latest Dyno 638 BHP (554 WHP)/520 FT-LBS

I posted previous DynoJet runs, but this one confirms the gains we get from a Eurotoys Supercharger pulley without a tune.

The first run (506 WHP) is a stock 2014 V8 S plus pulley with no tune. Comparing to my no-pully stock run, the SC pulley added +19 WHP (peak). All the gains were above 3750 RPM with +31 WHP/+30 ft-lbs (max WHP delta) occuring at 5800 RPM, exactly as advertised by EuroToys.

The last two runs added a Racechip GTS Black on Map 7 for 554 WHP/520 Ft-lbs (peak). Max HP delta was +76 WHP. That's +20 WHP/+20 Ft-lbs above my no pulley Dyno on Map 7. Using the 15% rule for RWD gives roughly 638 BHP.


​​​​​
DynoJet auto-adjusted for STD day. 61F ambient. No A/F monitor.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; 02-12-2019 at 11:56 AM.
The following users liked this post:
BS Alarm (02-12-2019)
  #2  
Old 02-12-2019, 01:59 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

You cannot run a lower pulley without a tune. CEL everywhere and way too lean.... but whatever you say
 
  #3  
Old 02-12-2019, 02:09 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
You cannot run a lower pulley without a tune. CEL everywhere and way too lean.... but whatever you say
My thoughts exactly.
 
  #4  
Old 02-12-2019, 02:15 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

This is a 2014 V8S. Ignore the green (tune only), the red is the baseline....



 
  #5  
Old 02-12-2019, 02:20 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

So you say you got 487rwhp from a totally stock V8S? Edit question for Jimlights obviously
 
The following users liked this post:
FType17 (02-12-2019)
  #6  
Old 02-12-2019, 03:02 PM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,140 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Now, unlike previous low-effort attempts this thread is a respectable technical trolling effort.
 
  #7  
Old 02-12-2019, 03:18 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

A supercharger pulley is not a lower pulley. You are confused with a crank pulley.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; 02-12-2019 at 03:21 PM.
  #8  
Old 02-12-2019, 04:24 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

OK, no point discussing any of this since every time there is an objection, things get edited to ones convenience. This thread is a waste. Whatever you say, so long as it makes you happy and enjoy your F-Type.
 
  #9  
Old 02-12-2019, 04:48 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JIMLIGHTA
A supercharger pulley is not a lower pulley. You are confused with a crank pulley.
Agreed,. Swapping the upper pulley will not throw a code.
 
  #10  
Old 02-12-2019, 04:52 PM
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 926
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Also, let's just reports facts as they are, Eurotoys claims 30HP at the flywheel... not +31WHP as you claim (even if it was the upper pulley as now edited)

"This smaller supercharger pulley will give your Jaguar 5.0L a modest power improvement of approximately 30+HP @ the flywheel. The Pulley should be added along with ECU Tuning for a major power gain".

You have no baseline on your dyno to make any type of comparison or analysis.
 
  #11  
Old 02-12-2019, 05:12 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
OK, no point discussing any of this since every time there is an objection, things get edited to ones convenience. This thread is a waste. Whatever you say, so long as it makes you happy and enjoy your F-Type.
Bye
 
  #12  
Old 02-12-2019, 05:14 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
Also, let's just reports facts as they are, Eurotoys claims 30HP at the flywheel... not +31WHP as you claim (even if it was the upper pulley as now edited)

"This smaller supercharger pulley will give your Jaguar 5.0L a modest power improvement of approximately 30+HP @ the flywheel. The Pulley should be added along with ECU Tuning for a major power gain".

You have no baseline on your dyno to make any type of comparison or analysis.
Already posted the baseline. It's been discussed at lenghth. Search tool.
 
  #13  
Old 02-12-2019, 05:19 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
This is a 2014 V8S. Ignore the green (tune only), the red is the baseline....
Fake Dyno.

Red torque doesn't criss-cross with red HP at 5252.

You're dismissed.

​​​
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; 02-12-2019 at 05:24 PM.
  #14  
Old 02-12-2019, 06:19 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JIMLIGHTA
Fake Dyno.

Red torque doesn't criss-cross with red HP at 5252.

You're dismissed.

​​​
You misread the chart. The curves will only cross at 5252 if both scales are identical.

Both are about 507 at 5252.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 02-12-2019 at 06:26 PM.
  #15  
Old 02-12-2019, 06:40 PM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,140 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
You misread the chart.
You are assuming that you are communicating with individual that is interested in establishing understanding instead of getting a reaction out of you. Your assumption is not reasonable.



 
The following 2 users liked this post by SinF:
FType17 (02-12-2019), JgaXkr (02-13-2019)
  #16  
Old 02-12-2019, 07:27 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
You are assuming that you are communicating with individual that is interested in establishing understanding.
Hope springs eternal.
 
  #17  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:24 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
  #18  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:25 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
  #19  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:44 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Add a new Porsche GT3 to the "blew the doors way, way off" list. Poor guy lined up with me four times with his brand new Volkswagon, still had temp tags. 85 speed limit, private highway, not patrolled AFAIK. The V8 S left him like he was standing still. In fairness, the GT3 is not super expensive. His blonde chick looked newer than the car. She wanted me so bad. He waved himself off politely. Good dude. Observations:

Runs were from approx 75 to 130, no doubt the worst place for his 339 ft-lb VW motor.

Jag +130 WHP (+31%)
Jag +180 Ft-lbs (+53%)
Jag +2 Cylinders
Jag +1L displacement
Jag 267 pounds lighter
Jag 110 lb girl lighter
Jag 20+ car lengths ahead before mercy
Jag vert top-down
Both RWD
Porsche sounded like a Shop Vac

In fairness, not fair.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; 02-12-2019 at 10:37 PM.
The following users liked this post:
BS Alarm (02-12-2019)
  #20  
Old 02-12-2019, 09:16 PM
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Both are about 507 at 5252.
I see that now, thanks. Apologies... I take it thats some motor on a bench since its measuring crank. So not a V8 S.
 


Quick Reply: Latest Dyno 638 BHP (554 WHP)/520 FT-LBS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.