F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Latest Dyno 638 BHP (554 WHP)/520 FT-LBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 11:44 AM
  #1  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default Latest Dyno 638 BHP (554 WHP)/520 FT-LBS

I posted previous DynoJet runs, but this one confirms the gains we get from a Eurotoys Supercharger pulley without a tune.

The first run (506 WHP) is a stock 2014 V8 S plus pulley with no tune. Comparing to my no-pully stock run, the SC pulley added +19 WHP (peak). All the gains were above 3750 RPM with +31 WHP/+30 ft-lbs (max WHP delta) occuring at 5800 RPM, exactly as advertised by EuroToys.

The last two runs added a Racechip GTS Black on Map 7 for 554 WHP/520 Ft-lbs (peak). Max HP delta was +76 WHP. That's +20 WHP/+20 Ft-lbs above my no pulley Dyno on Map 7. Using the 15% rule for RWD gives roughly 638 BHP.


​​​​​
DynoJet auto-adjusted for STD day. 61F ambient. No A/F monitor.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; Feb 12, 2019 at 11:56 AM.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 01:59 PM
  #2  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

You cannot run a lower pulley without a tune. CEL everywhere and way too lean.... but whatever you say
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 02:09 PM
  #3  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
You cannot run a lower pulley without a tune. CEL everywhere and way too lean.... but whatever you say
My thoughts exactly.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 02:15 PM
  #4  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

This is a 2014 V8S. Ignore the green (tune only), the red is the baseline....



 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 02:20 PM
  #5  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,521
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

So you say you got 487rwhp from a totally stock V8S? Edit question for Jimlights obviously
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 2,157
From: Canada, eh
Default

Now, unlike previous low-effort attempts this thread is a respectable technical trolling effort.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

A supercharger pulley is not a lower pulley. You are confused with a crank pulley.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; Feb 12, 2019 at 03:21 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

OK, no point discussing any of this since every time there is an objection, things get edited to ones convenience. This thread is a waste. Whatever you say, so long as it makes you happy and enjoy your F-Type.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 04:48 PM
  #9  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by JIMLIGHTA
A supercharger pulley is not a lower pulley. You are confused with a crank pulley.
Agreed,. Swapping the upper pulley will not throw a code.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 04:52 PM
  #10  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Also, let's just reports facts as they are, Eurotoys claims 30HP at the flywheel... not +31WHP as you claim (even if it was the upper pulley as now edited)

"This smaller supercharger pulley will give your Jaguar 5.0L a modest power improvement of approximately 30+HP @ the flywheel. The Pulley should be added along with ECU Tuning for a major power gain".

You have no baseline on your dyno to make any type of comparison or analysis.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 05:12 PM
  #11  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
OK, no point discussing any of this since every time there is an objection, things get edited to ones convenience. This thread is a waste. Whatever you say, so long as it makes you happy and enjoy your F-Type.
Bye
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 05:14 PM
  #12  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
Also, let's just reports facts as they are, Eurotoys claims 30HP at the flywheel... not +31WHP as you claim (even if it was the upper pulley as now edited)

"This smaller supercharger pulley will give your Jaguar 5.0L a modest power improvement of approximately 30+HP @ the flywheel. The Pulley should be added along with ECU Tuning for a major power gain".

You have no baseline on your dyno to make any type of comparison or analysis.
Already posted the baseline. It's been discussed at lenghth. Search tool.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 05:19 PM
  #13  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
This is a 2014 V8S. Ignore the green (tune only), the red is the baseline....
Fake Dyno.

Red torque doesn't criss-cross with red HP at 5252.

You're dismissed.

​​​
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; Feb 12, 2019 at 05:24 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 06:19 PM
  #14  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by JIMLIGHTA
Fake Dyno.

Red torque doesn't criss-cross with red HP at 5252.

You're dismissed.

​​​
You misread the chart. The curves will only cross at 5252 if both scales are identical.

Both are about 507 at 5252.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; Feb 12, 2019 at 06:26 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 06:40 PM
  #15  
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 2,157
From: Canada, eh
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
You misread the chart.
You are assuming that you are communicating with individual that is interested in establishing understanding instead of getting a reaction out of you. Your assumption is not reasonable.



 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 07:27 PM
  #16  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
You are assuming that you are communicating with individual that is interested in establishing understanding.
Hope springs eternal.
 
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 08:24 PM
  #17  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 08:25 PM
  #18  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

Add a new Porsche GT3 to the "blew the doors way, way off" list. Poor guy lined up with me four times with his brand new Volkswagon, still had temp tags. 85 speed limit, private highway, not patrolled AFAIK. The V8 S left him like he was standing still. In fairness, the GT3 is not super expensive. His blonde chick looked newer than the car. She wanted me so bad. He waved himself off politely. Good dude. Observations:

Runs were from approx 75 to 130, no doubt the worst place for his 339 ft-lb VW motor.

Jag +130 WHP (+31%)
Jag +180 Ft-lbs (+53%)
Jag +2 Cylinders
Jag +1L displacement
Jag 267 pounds lighter
Jag 110 lb girl lighter
Jag 20+ car lengths ahead before mercy
Jag vert top-down
Both RWD
Porsche sounded like a Shop Vac

In fairness, not fair.
 

Last edited by JIMLIGHTA; Feb 12, 2019 at 10:37 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 09:16 PM
  #20  
JIMLIGHTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Both are about 507 at 5252.
I see that now, thanks. Apologies... I take it thats some motor on a bench since its measuring crank. So not a V8 S.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.