F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More blower noise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #101  
Old 03-25-2018, 11:55 PM
zmoothg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 694
Received 150 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Now that I finally have my car back I can make some more videos of the car.
Here is a clip of the supercharger whine on a F-Type equipped with the Eventuri Intake.

 
The following users liked this post:
Cambo (03-26-2018)
  #102  
Old 03-26-2018, 12:08 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Awesome! You can actually hear it now!
 
  #103  
Old 03-26-2018, 04:58 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuning@VelocityAP
#3 & 4 are the mufflers, #7 & 8 along with 9 are the tubes. All these parts would need to be replaced.

You could do just the mufflers but that's only making the noise to be slightly heard at the air filter area. If you want to really hear the noise, you would have to replace the plastic tubes with thin metal type walled parts to echo the noise.

If you want to experiment, take out the intake mufflers and gut them. They usually have a mesh type bag holding insulation to muffle the blower noise. Not saying it'll work but less insulation will make it louder...just don't know how much it will improve.

Which one has the maf sensors in it?

If the mufflers were gutted surely this would help flow too and as the maf ID size is un-altered and position un-changed there would be no risk of rich/lean running as all sensors and tube diameters are as per original ECU coding so any addition airflow would be registered on the ECU as additional maf flow lbs per minute and fuelling altered/corrected by the stock tune as necessary?

Am just thinking as these tubes could be a nice easy modification to gut them giving some additional flow and maybe some additional noise.

Of course a tune + crank pulley will give ultimate results.
 
  #104  
Old 03-26-2018, 05:21 AM
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,303
Received 3,126 Likes on 2,304 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gibbo205
Which one has the maf sensors in it?

If the mufflers were gutted surely this would help flow too and as the maf ID size is un-altered and position un-changed there would be no risk of rich/lean running as all sensors and tube diameters are as per original ECU coding so any addition airflow would be registered on the ECU as additional maf flow lbs per minute and fuelling altered/corrected by the stock tune as necessary?

Am just thinking as these tubes could be a nice easy modification to gut them giving some additional flow and maybe some additional noise.

Of course a tune + crank pulley will give ultimate results.
Go back to post # 88, the MAF sensors are in part # 16.
 
The following users liked this post:
dwmilton (12-28-2021)
  #105  
Old 03-26-2018, 05:25 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
Go back to post # 88, the MAF sensors are in part # 16.
That is great then as any improvement in flow from gutting those muffler tubes would be registered by maf flow and ECU would adjust fuelling as necessary assuming our ECU's have some ability to adjust fuelling which I'd be amazed if they did not considering its a modern car.

Plus the fact the Venturi intake is a no tune air intake system tells me ECU adjust fine and the car also has knock sensors to adjust timing/spark on demand depending on what octane fuel you use.

I might rip of the tubs then and have a look at how restrictive the mufflers are, if they have a gauze in them, save to remove.

Just don't remove grids in intake tubes, they use those to straighten airflow to give smoother running engine, so always keep those.


P.S. Anyone got a cost price on the muffler tubes? I ask simply because if for whatever reason the car does not adapt and runs poorly, always handy to be able to just buy some new ones and put back in.
 
  #106  
Old 03-26-2018, 11:54 AM
sts-v's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 438
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Sounds great! Can we get a video from the outside when you drive by?
 
  #107  
Old 03-26-2018, 12:03 PM
zmoothg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 694
Received 150 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sts-v
Sounds great! Can we get a video from the outside when you drive by?
Will try to get you something within the week.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by zmoothg:
FR500GT (03-26-2018), sts-v (03-26-2018)
  #108  
Old 03-26-2018, 11:52 PM
domino_z's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 656
Received 134 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

is that vid with exhaust valves closed?
 
  #109  
Old 03-27-2018, 02:21 AM
zmoothg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 694
Received 150 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by domino_z
is that vid with exhaust valves closed?
Yes, I had to close the valves, because my exhaust is loud and drowns out the whine when open. I'll try to put together a more thorough video next time around. Exhaust closed, exhaust open, outside flybys, maybe even an aerial shot from my drone :P Still trying to determine what is the best microphone for the job.
 

Last edited by zmoothg; 03-27-2018 at 02:24 AM.
  #110  
Old 04-03-2018, 08:21 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Hi there

OK today I went to Jaguar and ordered the muffler intake tube sections (3 & 4), they are only £69 each so its worth a go, just got the one for now, if I can successfully gut it or get someone to do it for me I shall then buy the other side and repeat.

Once done I shall fit and report back.

My question is, this will obviously adversely impact air flow ratio, as I am sure it will allow more air to flow past the maf sensor.

As the maf sensor is still in place, in its original maf tube un-altered will the adjusted maf readings be taken into account by the ECU and fuelling corrected as required or do I run the risk of the car running leaning or causing knock by doing this?

On my Mustang as it had an adaptive ECU and two knock sensors air intake and exhaust modifications could be made with no ill effect to the running of the car as the maf metered any flow changes and of course the ECU would adapt and as such no tuning was required for minor airflow modifications such as intake tubes, air filters and catback exhaust systems. Tuning was only required if you changed maf ID size or a sensor was re-located in the exhaust or you did something that had a big impact on airflow, such as a super charger or de-cat.
 
  #111  
Old 04-03-2018, 08:52 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Removing a tube entirely does indeed throw a code. Whether removing the silencer does the same remains to be seen. As long as a code is not being thrown, the ECM will certainly be able to adapt sufficiently to keep the A/F ratio safe.
 
  #112  
Old 04-03-2018, 09:14 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Removing a tube entirely does indeed throw a code. Whether removing the silencer does the same remains to be seen. As long as a code is not being thrown, the ECM will certainly be able to adapt sufficiently to keep the A/F ratio safe.
Got you, so which tube have you removed or modified which throw a code out of curiosity?

But that is good to know, so if I gut them, car runs and I get no CEL light then the cars ECM is happy and fuelling is all within tolerances?
 
  #113  
Old 04-03-2018, 09:40 AM
alphakinase's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 312
Received 30 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Looking forward to results.

If the Eventuri intake doesn't throw codes, it's hard to imagine why your mod would.
 
  #114  
Old 04-03-2018, 10:11 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gibbo205
Got you, so which tube have you removed or modified which throw a code out of curiosity?

But that is good to know, so if I gut them, car runs and I get no CEL light then the cars ECM is happy and fuelling is all within tolerances?
I had removed the cross tube connecting the 2 filters to the SC intake.
No CEL, no problems.
 
  #115  
Old 04-03-2018, 10:23 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alphakinase
Looking forward to results.

If the Eventuri intake doesn't throw codes, it's hard to imagine why your mod would.
My thinking too.

Also the air snorkels, be great if I could get something fabricated to make the opening push up against the front grill opening to ram air down there throat and lower IAT's further.

Will collect it tomorrow and post some photos of the stock tube up and inside it so people can see how restrictive or not it is.
 
  #116  
Old 04-03-2018, 03:39 PM
sts-v's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 438
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

We are working on one as I speak.
 
  #117  
Old 04-03-2018, 04:23 PM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sts-v
We are working on one as I speak.
Good to hear.

For me working with the stock system is best as I am not much for open air cone filters.

As such maintaining stock filters and stock air boxes is a plus for me.

So just work on the intake tubes themselves, make them flow better and also try to re-direct the snorkels or put attachments on them that open right behind the open grill areas to cause more of a RAM AIR effect.
 
  #118  
Old 04-03-2018, 05:26 PM
sts-v's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 438
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Should have more details next week.
 
  #119  
Old 04-04-2018, 11:11 AM
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Received 127 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Hi there

OK parts 3 & 4 arrived, checked them out at dealership and decided to not go ahead with the purchase.

You can see from the image attachments the airflow is not restricted in anyway, there is no gauze or hydrocarbon or pre-cat type device in the tube at all unless of course they have been changed at some point during manufacturing.

Now of course the mid section is much thicker but trying to gut that would prove quite difficult and by doing so you'd then upset the air flow unless you smoothed out the internal walls.

I am quite sure that the thick mid-section absolutely reduces supercharger whine as the design looks to suppress noise and not impede airflow.

As such I feel the best solution would be to give sections 3 & 4 to a fabricator to have copied but without the centre bulge and as such a thinner wall and either made from carbon, FRP or ABS plastic all that matters is the internal diameters are kept as close to stock as possible with as smooth airflow as possible.

If there are any other parts people can suggest I look at on the intake system I shall do so.

Does anyone have an image of the interior of the air box from the V8? As maybe that also has carbon trap and/or Helmholtz resonator inside?
 
Attached Thumbnails More blower noise-thumbnail_img_3313.jpg   More blower noise-thumbnail_img_3314.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
alphakinase (04-04-2018)
  #120  
Old 04-04-2018, 01:32 PM
XJ8JR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 2,291
Received 526 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Those holes inside look like some sort of muffler function.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.