F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More photos of the facelift

  #21  
Old 07-06-2019, 05:33 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,636 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Burt Gummer
This has been the whole process. The 2015 FT being the 240Z. They must 'change' the look over time or people can't beat their cheat that they have the latest model. Unfortunately, and imo, the looks are degrading over time. That is how it works 90% of the time with car models.
Come to think of it, the MY15-17 F-Type coupe without side sills is indeed very reminiscent of the 240Z.
 
  #22  
Old 07-06-2019, 09:04 AM
XFactoR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 401
Received 70 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I agree...this is part of the cycle....best design was the original...then downhill.

Jag design hit its pinnacle with the XJ and the F-Type (CX-16)...slow decline ever since ....

XJ....F-Type

XF (2009)

XK (2006) F-Pace
I-Pace
XF. (2016)
XE
 
The following users liked this post:
Jagged Wire (10-13-2019)
  #23  
Old 07-06-2019, 05:13 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Oz
Posts: 3,894
Received 1,268 Likes on 874 Posts
Default

There have been some against that trend though. The 2012 XK was nicer than the previous ones (lights sorted), the 2011 XF was nicer than the previous one (lights sorted), the 2020 XE is nicer than the current (lights sorted). I think this F Type is going to look wicked. I hope they lose the horizontal bar on the vent, though. I wonder whether the engine in the mule is the current, or the new...sounds like the current one.

There is a render here that looks interesting https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/spy-shots/jaguar/f-type/
 

Last edited by BruceTheQuail; 07-06-2019 at 07:06 PM.
  #24  
Old 07-06-2019, 09:29 PM
Tork Monster's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 391
Received 156 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Burt Gummer
This has been the whole process. The 2015 FT being the 240Z. They must 'change' the look over time or people can't beat their cheat that they have the latest model. Unfortunately, and imo, the looks are degrading over time. That is how it works 90% of the time with car models.
So many cases of this over the years...
Hard to say whether this update will work well, but the rendering is promising

(Thanks BruceTheQuail)
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Tork Monster:
JgaXkr (07-07-2019), WJV (07-08-2019)
  #25  
Old 07-06-2019, 10:45 PM
AJ16er's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location:
Posts: 915
Received 137 Likes on 116 Posts
Default To Quote Paris Hilton

That's hot!
 
  #26  
Old 07-07-2019, 03:19 AM
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,802
Received 209 Likes on 186 Posts
Default

Like the rendering, very Portofino
 
  #27  
Old 08-18-2019, 05:51 AM
vika01's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 244
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Render:

 
The following users liked this post:
BruceTheQuail (08-18-2019)
  #28  
Old 08-19-2019, 06:35 AM
vika01's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 244
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
  #29  
Old 08-19-2019, 07:15 AM
Kdes's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Of course, in a mule you don't actually know what they're testing - could be any part of the car. I heard a tale a few decades ago that Porsche was testing a new drivetrain in a bodyshell from an Opel Rekord, and many autobahn drivers were bemused to be overtaken at speed by such a vehicle!

Agreed, I would have thought the track testing must imply performance changes or tweaks engine/suspension etc as I don’t think the would take to the track just for a new light layout - wind tunnel could do that.
Kev
 
  #30  
Old 08-19-2019, 11:59 PM
Jst2gtby's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 115
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vika01
This looks like a mustang... Dont get me wrong, I like the mustang... but it's no F-Type.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Jst2gtby:
Arne (08-20-2019), Chawumba (09-30-2019)
  #31  
Old 08-20-2019, 11:31 AM
Tork Monster's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 391
Received 156 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vika01
Originally Posted by Jst2gtby
This looks like a mustang... Dont get me wrong, I like the mustang... but it's no F-Type.
Agreed. This is a really beautiful front end, but I find it too generic. It looks like a combo BMW/Mustang/Jaguar... the original was distinct, and wasn't a copy of anything.

Often the original of a good design is the most beautiful. While updates make things look newer, they don't often make them look better.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Tork Monster:
Jst2gtby (08-20-2019), powerhouse (08-20-2019)
  #32  
Old 09-30-2019, 04:13 PM
vika01's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 244
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
The following users liked this post:
BruceTheQuail (09-30-2019)
  #33  
Old 09-30-2019, 05:49 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Oz
Posts: 3,894
Received 1,268 Likes on 874 Posts
Default

I'm not sure that the combination of flowing lines and sharp angles really works for me, I would prefer everything on the f type to be swoopy and rounded. That said, I suppose it has to evolve somewhere.
 
  #34  
Old 09-30-2019, 05:55 PM
Jaggyx's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,801
Received 301 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Not a fan. Looks like a new mustang.
 
  #35  
Old 10-01-2019, 07:22 AM
scm's Avatar
scm
scm is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 4,194
Received 1,382 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Default

Those bonnet/hood vents are for the RWD, surely?
 
  #36  
Old 10-01-2019, 10:02 AM
BRG4ever's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 38
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I am not sure I like it.
 
  #37  
Old 10-01-2019, 10:46 AM
fujicoupe's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,506
Received 424 Likes on 291 Posts
Default

I'm not a big fan of any design that alters the smooth integration of the front gills, whether that be trim pieces, mouldings, or whatnot.
 
  #38  
Old 10-03-2019, 04:08 AM
vika01's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 244
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

New video of the facelift:
 
The following users liked this post:
BruceTheQuail (10-03-2019)
  #39  
Old 10-03-2019, 04:20 PM
BRG4ever's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 38
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I think the new headlights reduce the design cues carried forward from the e type. Prove me wrong
Jeff
 
  #40  
Old 10-03-2019, 05:52 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Oz
Posts: 3,894
Received 1,268 Likes on 874 Posts
Default


Originally Posted by BRG4ever
I think the new headlights reduce the design cues carried forward from the e type. Prove me wrong
Jeff
Here you go, I have put your comment in a more contemporary setting
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: More photos of the facelift



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.