F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Paint Depth Readings

Old Sep 16, 2017 | 12:24 PM
  #1  
MarcFTR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default Paint Depth Readings

Has anybody taken any paint depth readings on their F-type prior to paint correcting?

I have just taken some readings on mine and its surprisingly high compared to what is typically expected.

The doors are around 5.0mils, the rear of the car around 6.0-7.0mils and the bonnet as high as 8.0-11.0mils. I don't think the car has had any paintwork prior to me owning it.

Its not an issue as I have some swirls on the bonnet that I want to work on, so I have some extra clear coat to work with. Just like to know if all models are around the same.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:17 PM
  #2  
MarcFTR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default

Think this thread answered my question. XK's appear to give very similar readings.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...-106406/page2/
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:27 PM
  #3  
Kief's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 549
Likes: 62
From: PA
Default

I don't recall the numbers my detailer measured a few weeks back when he did a full paint correction and ceramic coating on my ultimate black R, but he did comment on how hard the clear coat was.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2017 | 12:39 AM
  #4  
Misujerr's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 915
Likes: 100
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kief
he did comment on how hard the clear coat was.
Weird, a lot of people say how soft the paint is... Thanks for the info.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2017 | 04:55 AM
  #5  
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 340
From: Oslo, Norway
Default

The readings done on my car before detailing was from 100 to 124 micrometer (4 to 5 mils). The detailer said the clear coat was easy to work with (not too hard and not too soft), and that the quality of the paint was very good (and better than what he had seen on many other premium brands like Mercedes, BMW, Ferraries etc).


Pictures of some of the readings can be seen here:


https://www.detailersclub.no/forums/...comment-476098
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2017 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
AaronLin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 123
Likes: 84
From: Taipei
Default

The clear coat paint of Jaguar is quite soft. The hardest and toughest clear coat so far is probably Mercedes-Benz. All models now with nano clear coat.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2017 | 08:30 AM
  #7  
RickyJay52's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,468
Likes: 1,800
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by Arne
The readings done on my car before detailing was from 100 to 124 micrometer (4 to 5 mils). The detailer said the clear coat was easy to work with (not too hard and not too soft), and that the quality of the paint was very good (and better than what he had seen on many other premium brands like Mercedes, BMW, Ferraries etc).
Hey Arne!

I'd like to think that last part is true. I know absolutely nothing about paint readings but I've mentioned this before that my wife's 2006 BMW 325 xi Wagon's paint appears to have a better [thicker?] paint finish [quality?] than my 2015 Jaguar V6S F-Type. But, what do I know (other than it's always nice hearing from you?)

Best regards,
Jay
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2017 | 04:21 PM
  #8  
MarcFTR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default

Well, so far I spent yesterday afternoon and a few hours this evening correcting the bonnet and now moved onto the drivers door. Initially I was finding the bonnet hard work, but I think that was down to the amount of swirls that needed correcting. The doors I am finding a lot easier.

Shall try and get some pictures up when I am done.

Hoping to have it all corrected and waxed ready for Sunday, as I am going to Silverstone for the Ferrari race day.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2017 | 01:27 AM
  #9  
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 340
From: Oslo, Norway
Default

Originally Posted by RickyJay52
Hey Arne!

I'd like to think that last part is true. I know absolutely nothing about paint readings but I've mentioned this before that my wife's 2006 BMW 325 xi Wagon's paint appears to have a better [thicker?] paint finish [quality?] than my 2015 Jaguar V6S F-Type. But, what do I know (other than it's always nice hearing from you?)

Best regards,
Jay
Hi Jay!
I am not an expert on this matter, and I don't really know what "good paint finish (quality) means? But I did get the impression that "good quality" has to do with not "too much or too little" of anything (too soft makes it easier to get swirls, too hard makes it harder to correct), and that equal thicknes is a kind of meassure of good application controll - and makes it easier to see/meassure if it has been resprayed.
The detailer I used did not find any paint imperfections anywhere, which he said he often did on most cars.
Always nice hearing from you too Jay.

Best regards
Arne
​​​​​
​​​​​
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2017 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 179
From: Herefordshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by Arne
The readings done on my car before detailing was from 100 to 124 micrometer (4 to 5 mils). The detailer said the clear coat was easy to work with (not too hard and not too soft), and that the quality of the paint was very good (and better than what he had seen on many other premium brands like Mercedes, BMW, Ferraries etc).


Pictures of some of the readings can be seen here:


https://www.detailersclub.no/forums/...comment-476098
100-124 micrometers is 1-1.24 mm. So less than 0.0787402 inches by 40%-50%...
 

Last edited by F-typical; Sep 19, 2017 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Detail
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2017 | 02:37 PM
  #11  
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 179
From: Herefordshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by MarcFTR
Has anybody taken any paint depth readings on their F-type prior to paint correcting?

I have just taken some readings on mine and its surprisingly high compared to what is typically expected.

The doors are around 5.0mils, the rear of the car around 6.0-7.0mils and the bonnet as high as 8.0-11.0mils. I don't think the car has had any paintwork prior to me owning it.

Its not an issue as I have some swirls on the bonnet that I want to work on, so I have some extra clear coat to work with. Just like to know if all models are around the same.
A paint depth of between 0.5 and 1.1mm seems more likely? 11mm is getting on for 0.5 inches of paint...
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2017 | 03:27 PM
  #12  
MarcFTR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default

Its measured in Mils not mm. Can't remember exactly the equation now, but I think 50 mils was about 1.25 mm
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2017 | 08:55 PM
  #13  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,727
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by MarcFTR
Its measured in Mils not mm. Can't remember exactly the equation now, but I think 50 mils was about 1.25 mm
Correct. 50 mils is exactly 0.050 inches x 25.4 mm to the inch= 1.27mm
 
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2017 | 12:19 AM
  #14  
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 340
From: Oslo, Norway
Default

Micrometer to mils
Micrometers to mils
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.