F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Turbo 4-cyl F-Type has arrived...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2017 | 05:45 PM
  #141  
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 9,018
Likes: 3,658
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Default

Originally Posted by stmcknig
I see that UK Top Gear were testing the new Cayman which has also transitioned from a V6 to a 4 cylinder turbo. More HP and more torques but Chris Harris made similar comments about the lack of sporty noises....

So it's not just a Jaguar thing. And they also alluded to "emissions" being the cause for the change. It was quite funny watching him drive once round the track in an emissions optimized manner...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayKV5Ckbb18
And then near the end of the segment he ran through some of the alternatives for two door two seat sports cars under 50,000 GBP and rejected them all. The second one he rejected was the F-Type, and he attempted to justify that rejection by saying "you would need the V8 (ie R), but that costs 90,000 GBP, so it's out". He deliberately ignored the V6 versions of the F-Type, although even the base has more hp and torque than the new 917 Cayman.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2017 | 06:16 PM
  #142  
stmcknig's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 284
From: Austin TX
Default

That comes as little surprise, like many motoring shows they have been BMW or Porsche washed into believing that everybody should have an M3/M5 or a 911. I never plan to have either in my future. On the "Top Gear Aftershow" they also tracked the Audi TTRS and ultimately dismissed it in favour of the "disappointing" 917 Cayman.

It's still fun to watch Clarkson in the V6 F-Type and hear him say "at no time did I feel, this needs more power". He did take the mick out of the trunk/boot size when doing his "grocery shop".... ;-)
 

Last edited by stmcknig; Apr 24, 2017 at 06:20 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 06:04 PM
  #143  
jaguny's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,317
Likes: 635
From: upstate new york
Default

The Road and Track article I posted a few post back may be a sarcastic support of the Porsche but it well describes why those who know better picked the a jag.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 06:52 PM
  #144  
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 248
From: las vegas
Default

New engines are really getting efficient. Alfa has Ferrari derived V6 with over 500hp.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 07:28 PM
  #145  
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 661
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by bjg625
New engines are really getting efficient. Alfa has Ferrari derived V6 with over 500hp.
As an engineer who developed that car, I will say its not exactly the most efficient thing in the world; just a **** ton of boost. And Ferrari could have been more helpful with that project...
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2017 | 04:02 PM
  #146  
CaptainHam's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 326
Likes: 57
From: SW London, UK
Default

My dealer called me today to try and get me to chop in my V6 for a V8. I wasn't interested but while he was on the phone, I asked if he'd sold any of the 4-cyl yet.

He replied with a simple "No".
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 08:30 PM
  #147  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

Driving an XE with the 4-cyl. while my F-Type is in the shop for various issues (K405, K410, K433, and JTB00502). It's not a bad engine. The car feels pretty lively, in fact. It looks like it's 247HP and knocking on 3400 lbs. curb weight, but with the ZF 8-speed it's not bad.

If it were in an F-Type at 300HP and the car shed several hundred pounds, it'd be a contender for the folks who don't insist that nothing less than a V8 will do.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 09:17 PM
  #148  
hardwired's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 58
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by lizzardo
Driving an XE with the 4-cyl. while my F-Type is in the shop for various issues (K405, K410, K433, and JTB00502). It's not a bad engine. The car feels pretty lively, in fact. It looks like it's 247HP and knocking on 3400 lbs. curb weight, but with the ZF 8-speed it's not bad.

If it were in an F-Type at 300HP and the car shed several hundred pounds, it'd be a contender for the folks who don't insist that nothing less than a V8 will do.
I dunno man, the turbo lag on that thing... you could write a poem in the time it takes it to boost
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 09:23 PM
  #149  
hardwired's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 58
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I'm thinking there are going to be some good deals on the v6 base, now that there's a model that will likely render it redundant in the eyes of the average consumer.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 10:39 PM
  #150  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by hardwired
I dunno man, the turbo lag on that thing... you could write a poem in the time it takes it to boost
The XE? I do not find that to be the case at all. For reference though, turbo lag on anything modern compared to a 70's car is negligible.

Perhaps the funny thing here is that the stock tune on the supercharged V6 gives the impression of turbo lag while it decides to actually give you some power.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 11:03 PM
  #151  
hardwired's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 58
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by lizzardo
The XE? I do not find that to be the case at all. For reference though, turbo lag on anything modern compared to a 70's car is negligible.

Perhaps the funny thing here is that the stock tune on the supercharged V6 gives the impression of turbo lag while it decides to actually give you some power.
Ouch!
I've only driven the v6s (and v8 of course). I disagree about the xe though for sure. I've not driven that many turbo cars, and I have a general disdain for em, but the xe was so very obvious. Granted, it was decently quick once it got going, and overall, it was a fun car to drive.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 11:13 PM
  #152  
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 1,396
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

I dont want to argue, but we have the 25T XE (for my missus) which is a lot more sprightly than the 20T. It can be "surgey" but that isnt turbo lag, I think it is the gearing. If you put the car in dynamic and sport, it is very direct and behaves more like a NA 6 (or maybe a supercharged 4, I've never driven one).

But in normal transmission mode putting your foot down from launch, there is a bit of a slingshot effect, so I can understand why you would say there is turbo lag.

I agree with Lizzardo about lag in the supercharged V6, which again I think is gearing.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 11:17 PM
  #153  
a8silver's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 38
Likes: 25
From: Bay Area
Default

Jaguar is cheapening their brand and their cars to appeal to the broader audience. I had a 2012 XF till last year(it turned into a lemon), and loved the V8. I test drove the new XF with SC V6 and hated the car. The interior was cheap and it looked like an oldsmobile on the inside. Test drove the F-pace and didn't like the wind up engine either. Jaguar is ruining their cars, and I see a painful decline in their US market share in the very near future. Hold on to your V8s!!!!!
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 12:06 AM
  #154  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by hardwired
Ouch!
I've only driven the v6s (and v8 of course). I disagree about the xe though for sure. I've not driven that many turbo cars, and I have a general disdain for em, but the xe was so very obvious. Granted, it was decently quick once it got going, and overall, it was a fun car to drive.
Originally Posted by BruceTheQuail
I dont want to argue, but we have the 25T XE (for my missus) which is a lot more sprightly than the 20T. It can be "surgey" but that isnt turbo lag, I think it is the gearing. If you put the car in dynamic and sport, it is very direct and behaves more like a NA 6 (or maybe a supercharged 4, I've never driven one).

But in normal transmission mode putting your foot down from launch, there is a bit of a slingshot effect, so I can understand why you would say there is turbo lag.

I agree with Lizzardo about lag in the supercharged V6, which again I think is gearing.
I can only speak to a short time in the 25T, and don't know about the 20T. I'll pay more attention tomorrow looking for lag, but haven't noticed it so far. My Saab Turbo experience was from the "old days" before modern turbo technology and variable valve timing, so my impression of lag was minimal. My Volvo C30 with the 5cyl. turbo and Polestar tune seemed less laggy than the stock V6S F-Type. The perceived lag in the V6S is certainly due to tuning.

Two things highlight that:

1) Steady throttle still showed an abrupt change in power
2) The Velocity AP tune improved that considerably with no change in supercharger or its mechanical drive.

I think most of the perceived lag in the XE 25T is that it has the automatic. As good as it is, it's different than the manual to which I've grown accustomed. When I've decided to shift, I've decided. It may take me more time to accomplish the feat than the auto, but I don't need to anticipate my own decision the same way.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 12:56 AM
  #155  
hardwired's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 58
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by BruceTheQuail
I dont want to argue, but we have the 25T XE (for my missus) which is a lot more sprightly than the 20T. It can be "surgey" but that isnt turbo lag, I think it is the gearing. If you put the car in dynamic and sport, it is very direct and behaves more like a NA 6 (or maybe a supercharged 4, I've never driven one).

But in normal transmission mode putting your foot down from launch, there is a bit of a slingshot effect, so I can understand why you would say there is turbo lag.

I agree with Lizzardo about lag in the supercharged V6, which again I think is gearing.
Sure. I could be mistaken. I'll pay attention next time I drive it.
And it's not arguing as far as I'm concerned. I only argue with foosh. Whatever happened to that guy?
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 12:57 AM
  #156  
hardwired's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 58
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by a8silver
Jaguar is cheapening their brand and their cars to appeal to the broader audience. I had a 2012 XF till last year(it turned into a lemon), and loved the V8. I test drove the new XF with SC V6 and hated the car. The interior was cheap and it looked like an oldsmobile on the inside. Test drove the F-pace and didn't like the wind up engine either. Jaguar is ruining their cars, and I see a painful decline in their US market share in the very near future. Hold on to your V8s!!!!!
+1 ( and I say that as I consider selling mine &#128514
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 06:17 AM
  #157  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,727
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by lizzardo
1) Steady throttle still showed an abrupt change in power
The OEM tune on the V6 has a very notchy throttle response. I recorded a 20+ percent throttle command increase going from ~30 to 31 percent throttle position. With a tune, that design flaw becomes even more apparent and VAP has gone to great effort to successfully address that issue.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 09:24 AM
  #158  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by hardwired
Sure. I could be mistaken. I'll pay attention next time I drive it.
And it's not arguing as far as I'm concerned. I only argue with foosh. Whatever happened to that guy?
Not arguing either. This was my first experience with the new engine and although it's not an F-Type I thought I'd note my impressions here.

I was trying different modes yesterday but most of my commute is in traffic these days. I decided that Dynamic in stop and go traffic isn't the great. For that, Eco is just fine. I'd normally skip a mode called Eco, but I don't have that so thought I'd give it a try.

The part that takes the most getting used to is the lack of a gear shift lever, but I am reminded how good that ZF is. My previous thought was that it was an automatic I could live with if no manual transmission were available. Thankfully, one is, although not with this engine.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 10:20 AM
  #159  
DJS's Avatar
DJS
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 2,664
From: Metrowest Boston
Default

Originally Posted by hardwired
...I only argue with foosh. Whatever happened to that guy?
Foosh still drops by occasionally. He traded in his F-type for a Vette.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigCat09
F-Type ( X152 )
2
Apr 14, 2017 05:01 PM
Uncle Fishbits
F-Type ( X152 )
0
Jun 9, 2016 09:52 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.