Two Oddities with the F-Type
- Speedo on the left/Tach on the right - Don't recall ever seeing it this way
- On the AT, push forward to downshift/Pull backwards to upshift
- Speedo on the left/Tach on the right - Don't recall ever seeing it this way
- On the AT, push forward to downshift/Pull backwards to upshift
I'm from Australia and I cant recall having a car (and I've owned maybe 15) with the speedo on the right!
With the shifter, I've had some (volvos) where you had to push it away from you to go 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 etc which I find unnatural. I thought that the f type the opposite which I find natural because it means that you are pulling it toward you to go from 1 - 2 which is how you would in a manual. But I barely use the shifter because it has paddles, I'd be much more inclined to use the shifter if it had gates like a true manual.
With the shifter, I've had some (volvos) where you had to push it away from you to go 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 etc which I find unnatural. I thought that the f type the opposite which I find natural because it means that you are pulling it toward you to go from 1 - 2 which is how you would in a manual. But I barely use the shifter because it has paddles, I'd be much more inclined to use the shifter if it had gates like a true manual.
Regarding the gearshift - a sequential gearbox in race cars is pull towards to shift up, and push away to shift down. Watch any video on youtube
Jag has done it that way as it's how racing cars (and all other auto's I've driven) do it!
Jag has done it that way as it's how racing cars (and all other auto's I've driven) do it!
Here's something I've been pondering for decades: the MT shift pattern remains the same whether right or left hand drive. When racing British cars, we would convert to right hand drive for that extra millisecond and I was never able to get used to the pull-toward-you-and-up 2nd to 3rd gear slams. I can understand why British Leyland wouldn't build two different gearboxes with opposite patterns, but why didn't they build them with a pattern most suited for right hand drive?
+1 I only use the digital speedo, never the analogue.
The gearshift makes sense to me, when you are under hard acceleration you are pushed back in your seat and its more natural to pull back on the lever to change up a gear - similarly under hard braking you are pushed forward and therefore pushing forward to shift down is again more natural. Don't think I would like having it the other way round, forward for up and backward for down.
The gearshift makes sense to me, when you are under hard acceleration you are pushed back in your seat and its more natural to pull back on the lever to change up a gear - similarly under hard braking you are pushed forward and therefore pushing forward to shift down is again more natural. Don't think I would like having it the other way round, forward for up and backward for down.
Trending Topics
Here's something I've been pondering for decades: the MT shift pattern remains the same whether right or left hand drive. When racing British cars, we would convert to right hand drive for that extra millisecond and I was never able to get used to the pull-toward-you-and-up 2nd to 3rd gear slams. I can understand why British Leyland wouldn't build two different gearboxes with opposite patterns, but why didn't they build them with a pattern most suited for right hand drive?
Just what you are used to, I suppose.
The gearshift makes sense to me, when you are under hard acceleration you are pushed back in your seat and its more natural to pull back on the lever to change up a gear - similarly under hard braking you are pushed forward and therefore pushing forward to shift down is again more natural. Don't think I would like having it the other way round, forward for up and backward for down.
The first week I purchased the car I immediately added extended paddle shifters, so I rarely ever use the center lever except to put the car into Sport+ at start up.
That's another good point, I always use the paddles, can't remember ever using the shift lever.
I suppose it boils down to what you are used to. I had a 2013 Lexus GS 350 before my F-Type. When the shift lever was in 'manual', pushing it towards the front of the car moved it into the next higher gear. To me, that made sense. Forward = Faster. I got used to it (although I seldom used it) so the F-Type seems counterintuitive to me.
On the F-Type it's sprung both ways to the center of the shift pattern to rest between 3 and 4.
The Tach is much more important in a sportscar than the speedo, it is more in view that way. Also, if you paddle shift I find it more view-able at a glance, especially when considering a downshift
The Manual mode mode is the correct way, this is derived from the racing sequential mode. While everyone may have a preference, this is considered in general as the correct way
The Manual mode mode is the correct way, this is derived from the racing sequential mode. While everyone may have a preference, this is considered in general as the correct way
never noticed the tach being in a different spot. The shifter is backwards from most vehicles I've had but I like it better.....plus since I use the paddles anytime I'm shifting "manually" it doesn't really matter.
2 cents,
Dave
2 cents,
Dave






