F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

VelocityAP Jaguar F-Type ECU Tuning, V6, V6S, V8S, V8R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2016 | 09:26 PM
  #281  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default I/M Compliant

I am pleased to report after a few weeks of running the VAP V6 tune, that the VAP V6 tune even with the stage II (+18mm vs +10mm) lower pulley will comply with the parameters monitored by state emissions inspections (at least in 49 states). My local tuner also commented very positively on the smooth delivery of power under aggressive throttle throughout the engine speed range when he took it out for a test drive today, a quality that many tunes can't deliver if they result in significant power gains. He also proclaimed that he would recommend the VAP tune to anyone else that approached him with the 3 .0 Jag engine. High praise indeed since I have listened to him for over 10 years proclaiming how bad or fraudulent 95+% of the tuners are.


Thank you Stuart and Chris.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 12:07 AM
  #282  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Good show, Velocity AP!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 02:25 AM
  #283  
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 340
From: Oslo, Norway
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Good show, Velocity AP!!
+1
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 07:29 PM
  #284  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f-type-x152-72/rolling-road-tomorrow-today-lol-167452/#post1516871

Link in here for those following this thead. VAP software + 200 cell cats + pulley(supplied originally by Viezu) = 80BHP gain on F-Type R. Possibly another 10BHP with temperature adjustments.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 09:37 PM
  #285  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f-type-x152-72/rolling-road-tomorrow-today-lol-167452/#post1516871

Link in here for those following this thead. VAP software + 200 cell cats + pulley(supplied originally by Viezu) = 80BHP gain on F-Type R. Possibly another 10BHP with temperature adjustments.
Price for that?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 10:24 PM
  #286  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
Price for that?
All the parts together is $2490, but we're going to do a kit price at $2295, and with lowering springs at $2895. If you split the difference and say 85BHP gain on the 'R', that's $27/HP
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 11:16 PM
  #287  
mp51998's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 10
From: South Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...2/#post1516871

Link in here for those following this thead. VAP software + 200 cell cats + pulley(supplied originally by Viezu) = 80BHP gain on F-Type R. Possibly another 10BHP with temperature adjustments.
Same gains on the AWD R? Very tempted to pull the trigger.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 11:22 PM
  #288  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

Originally Posted by mp51998
Same gains on the AWD R? Very tempted to pull the trigger.
Identical. Even on the R, it's some of the least expensive HP you'll ever find.

On the 'S'... man, it's about $16/HP!!!
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 06:02 AM
  #289  
Timbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 394
Likes: 102
From: Ruislip, London
Default

I'd just like to add even though i live across the pond, Stuart was a pleasure to deal with always answered emails promptly, even answering his phone whilst at the airport waiting to come over here.
Was always honest about his products which delivered exactly what they said on the tin.
Thanks Stuart and velocityAP.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:36 PM
  #290  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

V8 Power Pack is Live:
Jaguar F-Type V8S & V8R Power Pack Upgrade

Offering free shipping to CONUS/CANADA on the first 3 orders
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 08:45 PM
  #291  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP

On the 'S'... man, it's about $16/HP!!!
Stuart
I love this tune. It easily outruns a Carrera 4s in the mountains. Fuel economy at 80 mph improved as well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 08:45 PM
  #292  
cbroth1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 305
Likes: 84
From: San Diego
Default

Stuart, V8 crank pulley please. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 10:54 AM
  #293  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
Stuart, V8 crank pulley please. Thanks.
640BHP is not enough for you? LOL....
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:22 PM
  #294  
cbroth1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 305
Likes: 84
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
640BHP is not enough for you? LOL....
Never enough. 😬
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 01:39 PM
  #295  
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 661
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
Stuart, V8 crank pulley please. Thanks.
Agreed. That and headers will make me a happy man. Take my money damnit!
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 02:10 PM
  #296  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 1,024
Default

Originally Posted by Stohlen
Agreed. That and headers will make me a happy man. Take my money damnit!
Well, the good news there is that my buddy decided not to go for the SVR, and he's talking about bringing the 'R' here mid-September.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 03:33 PM
  #297  
IronMike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 682
Likes: 245
From: Southern Cal
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
Stuart, V8 crank pulley please. Thanks.
The following is a question to which I am seeking validation/confirmation from those with more experience in the tuning these cars:

In following the performance tune threads here for a year or so, I have come to the conclusion - right or wrong - that doing one pulley or the other is within the realm of "safe", whatever that may mean to a given owner, but doing both pulleys may be pushing the limits of the supercharger as far as durability, due to the sizable increase in RPM's? T or F?

Further, it is my understanding that if only one pulley is going to be replaced, the Crank Pulley is the better one to upgrade, as it is less hassle to replace, and the percentage increase is greater than can be obtained with any of the upper pulley options.

I seem to recall that a Crank Pulley is quite a bit more costly than a Supercharger Pulley, but I've also read quite a few horror stories about the various techniques and mechanisms many have deployed attempting to replace the upper pulley, which may make the cost savings rather short sighted.

Is my assessment generally correct?
And if so, why are we not seeing more Crank Pulleys being upgraded than upper pulleys?


p.s. I do realize some of the achievable gains are variant specific. I own a 2015 "R", RWD.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 05:32 AM
  #298  
mp51998's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 10
From: South Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
640BHP is not enough for you? LOL....
640BHP equates to about 500AWHP. Now 640AWHP would be sweet.

I'd like to see headers too.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 06:04 PM
  #299  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by IronMike
The following is a question to which I am seeking validation/confirmation from those with more experience in the tuning these cars:

In following the performance tune threads here for a year or so, I have come to the conclusion - right or wrong - that doing one pulley or the other is within the realm of "safe", whatever that may mean to a given owner, but doing both pulleys may be pushing the limits of the supercharger as far as durability, due to the sizable increase in RPM's? T or F?

Further, it is my understanding that if only one pulley is going to be replaced, the Crank Pulley is the better one to upgrade, as it is less hassle to replace, and the percentage increase is greater than can be obtained with any of the upper pulley options.

I seem to recall that a Crank Pulley is quite a bit more costly than a Supercharger Pulley, but I've also read quite a few horror stories about the various techniques and mechanisms many have deployed attempting to replace the upper pulley, which may make the cost savings rather short sighted.

Is my assessment generally correct?
And if so, why are we not seeing more Crank Pulleys being upgraded than upper pulleys?


p.s. I do realize some of the achievable gains are variant specific. I own a 2015 "R", RWD.

Answers apply to the R only.
1. False, the combination will not overdrive the R1900 beyond Eaton's recommended maximum spin for that SC.
2. True, maximum available upper pulley differential is 8.3%. Maximum lower differential is 11.8 %. And, yes, the lower pulley is much easier to replace and can be removed without destruction. The upper OEM most times cannot be salvaged.
3. When replacing the upper pulley, a smaller belt can be sourced by using a V6 OEM belt. When replacing the lower pulley, only one sided belts come in the right size, so a smooth idler pulley needs to be installed to accommodate. Adds to the materials cost (minor), but the total labor effort (and cost) is much less than swapping out the upper pulley.
4. Traditionally everyone has started by swapping out the upper pulley and that was the only pulley available until early this year. There's only one supplier I know of for the +18mm lower pulley, and VAP is sourcing it from them.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; Aug 20, 2016 at 07:00 AM. Reason: Corrected one ratio
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 06:58 PM
  #300  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Answers apply to the R only.
2. True, maximum available upper pulley differential is 8.3%. Maximum lower differential is 11.1 %. And, yes, the lower pulley is much easier to replace and can be removed without destruction. The upper OEM most times cannot be salvaged.


4. Traditionally everyone has started by swapping out the upper pulley and that was the only pulley available until early this year. There's only one supplier I know of for the +18mm lower pulley, and VAP is sourcing it from them.
Why is the maximum lower differential 11.1%? Is there a diameter limitation because of housing constraints?

On #4, Velocity AP is developing their own in-house crank pulley....stay tuned (literally :-)
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.