F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Y2K22?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 02:46 PM
  #1  
Carbuff2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 928
From: Exit 30 in NorthWest NJ
Default Y2K22?

Anyone had issues with their clocks resetting after the new year? (Not me, but its snowing outside so car has been OFF)

https://tinyurl.com/yckrmb9k

The reason this is occurring is due to the failure to convert the Jan 1st, 2022 to a signed int as 2201010001 is larger than 2147483647 (the maximum number that an int32 can hold).
EDIT: The result would be that a clock would display January 1st 2002, 12:00
 

Last edited by Carbuff2; Jan 3, 2022 at 03:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 06:48 PM
  #2  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by Carbuff2
Anyone had issues with their clocks resetting after the new year? (Not me, but its snowing outside so car has been OFF)

https://tinyurl.com/yckrmb9k

EDIT: The result would be that a clock would display January 1st 2002, 12:00
Mine's right, showing 03/01/2022 (yes, I have my date display set that way). I just finished a map update and confirmed that. Side note: This is only the second update I've done. There's no way I'd do it every year.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 07:19 PM
  #3  
DJS's Avatar
DJS
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 2,663
From: Metrowest Boston
Default

That would take some really, really, stupid programmers to produce that. Not that there aren’t plenty of them around.

I believe I’ve had the F-type display the year 2136, or something like that. I don’t expect to be driving it then.
 

Last edited by DJS; Jan 3, 2022 at 07:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 07:33 PM
  #4  
Mbourne's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 772
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
That would take some really, really, stupid programmers to produce that. Not that there aren’t plenty of them around.

I believe I’ve had the F-type display the year 2136, or something like that. I don’t expect to be driving it then.
I do!
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 08:35 PM
  #5  
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,301
From: Northern California
Default

It's not just the programmers that suffer from lapses of intelligence. The standards organizations do some odd things too. I'm not sure what it was that I ran across this (perhaps PID?) where the standard called for signed integers where negative numbers made no sense.

Nevertheless, One would be foolish (or human) to underestimate the power of human stupidity.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 11:56 PM
  #6  
RickyJay52's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,468
Likes: 1,800
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
That would take some really, really, stupid programmers to produce that. Not that there aren’t plenty of them around.

I believe I’ve had the F-type display the year 2136, or something like that. I don’t expect to be driving it then.
Are you saying that you are NOT planning on joining us for the 2136 Jaguar F-Type Afterlife Tour? Who’s gonna take pictures if not you?

Originally Posted by Mbourne
I do!
Marko’s in!
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2022 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
KalamazooJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 191
Likes: 96
From: Kalamazoo
Default

True Story: My father worked for Michigan Bell Telephone for 35 years in the database division. Discharged from the Army in '59 and started work with Ma Bell thereafter...so early 60s. Early days of computer mainframes. I recall even in the early 70s (when I was a wee lad) him bringing home aluminum magnetic storage discs (roughly 36" in diameter) that had had "head-crashes" (rendering them completely useless). To buy them new, with total storage capacity of 1 MB, it cost Ma Bell $100K (USD) at that time....1 MB. As soon as there was a head crash, it was worth $0. So he would bring them home and we used them to keep squirrels off our bird feeders. The point of this was that storage was at a PREMIUM in those days, so the phone company looked for every opportunity to "save bits" such as dropping the 19 in the 4-digit year. Which is why there was the whole Y2K concerns. BUT, today, when I can buy 2 TBs of storage for $50 or less, there should be ZERO reason for this same phenomenon to be happening in a $60-$120K auto.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2022 | 12:40 PM
  #8  
Carbuff2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 928
From: Exit 30 in NorthWest NJ
Default

OK, sorry to have raised the issue. Our 2014's clock does NOT suffer from the Y2K22 bug...verified.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2022 | 05:24 PM
  #9  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 1,773
From: Southampton, UK
Default

It's just a Microsoft thing, I think. I recall som eyears ago when the clocks went back a colleague was working (very) late and his clock went back an hour every time it got to 2am! The third time it did it he shut down and went to bed.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaguar Forums Editor
Jaguar Press release
0
Jan 27, 2020 07:58 AM
Jaguar Forums Editor
Jaguar Press release
0
Apr 9, 2019 09:58 AM
Jaguar Forums Editor
Jaguar Press release
0
Oct 20, 2016 05:08 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.