ecu reprogram-xj sv8
#1
#2
#3
#4
Would recommend a before dyno, then at least you (and everyone else) what will work and what doesn't. Problem is you can only get rwhp figures, so a 4.2 car could get about 330 rwhp on certain dynos. Would guess you may have now about 25 rwhp more and maybe you get another 20 more with the ECU tune, maybe you could get 375 rwhp which equates to about 450 engine hp (17% drive train loss). All guesses of course. Better do the before dyno, otherwise you will be wondering afterwards why you might not have gotten what you expected.
PS Stock you already have a cold air intake, as far as I know Mina only sells hot air intake systems.
PS Stock you already have a cold air intake, as far as I know Mina only sells hot air intake systems.
#5
Would recommend a before dyno, then at least you (and everyone else) what will work and what doesn't. Problem is you can only get rwhp figures, so a 4.2 car could get about 330 rwhp on certain dynos. Would guess you may have now about 25 rwhp more and maybe you get another 20 more with the ECU tune, maybe you could get 375 rwhp which equates to about 450 engine hp (17% drive train loss). All guesses of course. Better do the before dyno, otherwise you will be wondering afterwards why you might not have gotten what you expected.
PS Stock you already have a cold air intake, as far as I know Mina only sells hot air intake systems.
PS Stock you already have a cold air intake, as far as I know Mina only sells hot air intake systems.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
#11
The following users liked this post:
JagManBonano (09-22-2011)
#12
I'm getting my ECU reprogrammed tomorrow so hopefully that solves my problem since I converted back to the stock cold air intake with a K&N filter. If any other problem occurs, then I'll have to change my MAFS and get the original one instead of the remanufactured one I got from Auto Zone thats says "Toyota".
#13
#14
just took the sv8 for a drive with ninja from singh autosport. the car moves.. the idle took a while to readjust to new timing. ninja said it would take abouth 100 miles of driving for the full reset to occur. he said i should drive aggrevisely and the car with correct with my driving style. I cannot wait to get the car dynoed. I was unable to fully engage the throtle because we had just had a significant downpour and the roads where wet. next : new tires for more grip... the engine sound deeper and is definitely breathing more.. zoom.. zoom...
#15
#16
after 2 days of driving the reprogram seems to have really set in. the car feels like there is much more hp .. at higher speed it seems like I could just keep going. the power is much smoother and I am happy so far... when I hit the gas hard the traction control comes on often..
#17
thanks for the prop. the powercurve is great. very smooth. no hesitation.. I put the mina intake in a while back. I would change the intake also. I agree the position could be better. mine is opens to the drivers side front of engine. before the ecu change I noticed uneven accel. I wonder if how evective the intercoller is? good luck..
#19
went to do my dyno yesterday.
the shop said I had a vacuum leak and the car was running to rich.
I am going to get the leak fixed tommorrow and the take the car back for another dyno.
the peak results were decent even with the problem.
358 hp/380 tq at wheels. calculating with a 20% loss at wheel that gives an engine rated at 448 hp/475 tq. the shop stated there should be a much better pull with the vacuum leak fixed. sh*t happens..
post back after the next dyno..
the shop said I had a vacuum leak and the car was running to rich.
I am going to get the leak fixed tommorrow and the take the car back for another dyno.
the peak results were decent even with the problem.
358 hp/380 tq at wheels. calculating with a 20% loss at wheel that gives an engine rated at 448 hp/475 tq. the shop stated there should be a much better pull with the vacuum leak fixed. sh*t happens..
post back after the next dyno..
#20
went to do my dyno yesterday.
the shop said I had a vacuum leak and the car was running to rich.
I am going to get the leak fixed tommorrow and the take the car back for another dyno.
the peak results were decent even with the problem.
358 hp/380 tq at wheels. calculating with a 20% loss at wheel that gives an engine rated at 448 hp/475 tq. the shop stated there should be a much better pull with the vacuum leak fixed. sh*t happens..
post back after the next dyno..
the shop said I had a vacuum leak and the car was running to rich.
I am going to get the leak fixed tommorrow and the take the car back for another dyno.
the peak results were decent even with the problem.
358 hp/380 tq at wheels. calculating with a 20% loss at wheel that gives an engine rated at 448 hp/475 tq. the shop stated there should be a much better pull with the vacuum leak fixed. sh*t happens..
post back after the next dyno..
Hi Rick,
Could you please let me know where you have the vacuum leak at and how much it cost you? I think I might have the same problem except my car is running too lean. It sounds like I have a vacuum leak, but some people said its normal and it could be the release valve (that looks like a pancake). Let me know what happens.
Thanks!