Jaguar or not a Jaguar
#1
Jaguar or not a Jaguar
Can anyone " please explain " why the Classic category starts with the Mk 5 and not the 1946-8 Jaguars or better still why not the SS Jaguar. These would definitely be classed as Classics.
Is it that no one has one or two or are they just to old to be listed ?
Is it that no one has one or two or are they just to old to be listed ?
Last edited by Kove; 09-20-2014 at 02:35 AM.
The following users liked this post:
GGG (09-20-2014)
#2
#3
There would be few posts regarding the very early models. Numbers built were low and the few surviving examples are usually in the hands of experienced collectors/restorers who don't need to look to forums like this for help and advice.
We do have the Other Jaguar Models / Concepts / Replicas - Jaguar Forums - Jaguar Enthusiasts Forum forum which is appropriate for low volume models not covered elsewhere.
Graham
#5
#6
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,752
Received 6,253 Likes
on
5,453 Posts
#7
To be fair, I think Kove has a point, we do "exclude" the early cars here, the pre-war SS's and the MK IV are missing from the coverage of models in the subforums.
For me it would make sense if we have the pre-war SS's, the MK IV and the MK V separate from the later cars, primarily because the engine's in these cars were the Standard pushrod motor, whereas the MK VII onwards got the XK engine.
That's how the cars are segregated in most clubs anyhow.
While we are at it, the XKSS subforum should also include the C-Type and D-Type
For me it would make sense if we have the pre-war SS's, the MK IV and the MK V separate from the later cars, primarily because the engine's in these cars were the Standard pushrod motor, whereas the MK VII onwards got the XK engine.
That's how the cars are segregated in most clubs anyhow.
While we are at it, the XKSS subforum should also include the C-Type and D-Type
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)