MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

MK2 radiator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2020 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
rdssdi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 135
Likes: 7
From: earth
Default MK2 radiator

Looking for a MK2 radiator. Early to mid '60's. All may be the same, I do not know. Prefer one requiring rebuilding. Please contact me with cost and your location. Thanks. Bob
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2020 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

Might be better if you told us where you were on the Earth. Auto radiators in the Late 60s with the BW35 box had a cooler in the base, not sure if the DG250 box from the early 60s had a cooler or not.so it might be best if you also state if you want a radiator for an Auto or manual.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2020 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
rdssdi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 135
Likes: 7
From: earth
Default

The early radiators (DG250) did not have the trans cooler at the bottom. I am in eastern pennsylvania U.S.. Sometimes I feel like I am on Mars. Have you ever seen the MK2 radiator from a BW35 car? Must be quite rare in the U.S.. Thanks. Bob
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2020 | 08:19 AM
  #4  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

Originally Posted by rdssdi
The early radiators (DG250) did not have the trans cooler at the bottom. I am in eastern pennsylvania U.S.. Sometimes I feel like I am on Mars. Have you ever seen the MK2 radiator from a BW35 car? Must be quite rare in the U.S.. Thanks. Bob
I have a late S Type with the BW35 box and I know the late Mk2s with the slim bumpers from 1967/68 were fitted with the BW35 box in the UK as well but not sure how many made it to the US.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 06:20 AM
  #5  
Coventry Foundation's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 771
Likes: 389
Default

Slim bumper cars were 240/340 not Mk2 and while some have made their way to the US over the years NONE were imported for US customers as the cars were non DOT compliant in too many ways to modify.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

Thanks for the info I was not aware that the 240/340 version of the Mk2 Jaguar was not exported to the USA. I assume this was also the case for the twelve 380s with slim line bumpers that were built?
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 10:27 AM
  #7  
Coventry Foundation's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 771
Likes: 389
Default

Correct. Jaguar knew they were replacing all of the sedan range with the XJ6 so no effort was put into making the 240/340/380/ legal. It would have required a change of the entire facia--re engineering the brake system to dual master cylinder or dual braking system along with hundreds of other details. Canada imported the 240/340 and perhaps a 380 but not US.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 01:11 PM
  #8  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

Question though Jeff, if the Mk2 Slim line bumpered 240/340 was not imported to the US due to DOT issues why was the S Type still being imported into the US in June 1968?
Both the S Type and the 240/340 were built on the same platform, other than the rear suspension set up. Same wooden dash, single master cylinder brakes, single circuit brakes and so on. The 420 was a little more safety conscious in that it had a padded dash top but still had as far as I know single circuit brakes and single master cylinder and yet this was also still being imported to the US in 1969!
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 01:37 PM
  #9  
Coventry Foundation's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 771
Likes: 389
Default

Cass Jaguar only put efforts in the E-Type to update for the 1968 NITSA or DOT standards. They did Not place any effort on any other sedan as the XJ6 (S1) was to be the range in the US. 420,420G,340,240, and S were not imported. It is possible there was unsold stock in the Tariff Free Zones (and most likely was) which could be sold as new but under the 67 rules. THese cars would have already "passed" inspections and were just held. The XJ6 was late to the US (69) so there was a void for a short period.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 02:04 PM
  #10  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

There are always anomalies in this DATA. On the S Type register we have a LHD 3.8 S Types with a manufacturer date of June 1968 in the US but who is to say this is not a later import from Europe or Canada. Thank you for information. They say learn something new everyday.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 02:24 PM
  #11  
Coventry Foundation's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 771
Likes: 389
Default

The US has a import law that a car 25 years or older may be imported. I have a Riley Elf for fun---but never imported at the time.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2020 | 08:03 PM
  #12  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,493
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

Originally Posted by Cass3958
There are always anomalies in this DATA. On the S Type register we have a LHD 3.8 S Types with a manufacturer date of June 1968 in the US but who is to say this is not a later import from Europe or Canada. Thank you for information. They say learn something new everyday.
S Types were imported new to the US. Only in 3.8 form. They were replaced the minute the 420 became available that sold well in the US. The 420 had padded dash, padded door panels instead of wood with a small wooden garnish rail top of door & dual circuit brakes.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 28, 2020 at 08:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2020 | 06:00 AM
  #13  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

Thanks Glyn is this all that was needed then to get the 420 around the DOT laws? I was not aware the 420 had dual circuit brakes I thought it was the same as the S Type so again that is something new for today.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2020 | 06:19 AM
  #14  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,493
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

Yes basically. The 420 was fully compliant. Another thing they had to do was reduce the size of the 7" headlights that the body was pressed for. So they installed a chrome filler piece so that the 420 had 4 ~ 5.7" approx headlights to meet US regulations. i.e. 4 small lights instead of large outers & small inners. Can't think of anything else offhand.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 29, 2020 at 06:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 05:49 AM
  #15  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,493
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

~~~ 420





 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 31, 2020 at 05:56 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 06:10 AM
  #16  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

You know I had never noticed the smaller lights before Glyn. First glance without knowing and you think they are the standard 7 inch the same as the S Type then you see the large chrome insert to make them look bigger that the inner lights. Also the fact that all four lights are on the same level unlike the S type where the Fog/driving lights are lower than the main lights.
Very interesting and thank you.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 09:31 AM
  #17  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,493
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

Remember UK cars still have 7 inch outers. Shown above is US only.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 09:33 AM
  #18  
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1,224
From: Torquay Devon England
Default

That's why I have never noticed it in the UK then. Dah Dah !!!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lambretta
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
17
Nov 15, 2018 09:54 AM
wynlaidig
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
3
Sep 2, 2016 08:08 AM
kenbowen
XF and XFR ( X250 )
0
Mar 30, 2016 09:09 AM
GT6Steve
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
5
Aug 1, 2014 01:04 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.