F-Pace (X761) / C-X17 2016 - Onwards

Cx17

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2014 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
desertchimera's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 190
Likes: 12
From: Lubbock Texas
Default Cx17

2015 Jaguar SUV...... Drooling
 

Last edited by Cambo; Mar 26, 2014 at 03:14 AM. Reason: Fixed video
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 02:54 AM
  #2  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,505
Likes: 4,902
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Man that's ugly.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 07:48 AM
  #3  
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,074
Likes: 4,722
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I don't find it ugly, but if I needed an SUV I would stick with a Jeep or a Subaru....
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 08:17 AM
  #4  
pab's Avatar
pab
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 246
From: Boston
Default

>if I needed an SUV I would stick with a Jeep or a Subaru....

Why, since I'm sure it's a Land/Range Rover under the skin. Expensive stuff, true, but the L/R Rover folks know how to build an SUV.

The real question is since Tata has L/R Rover why dilute the combined brand with another vehicle? It would seem to make more sense for them to coordinate brands and have both cross-selling the other (i.e., Jaguar guy wants an SUV and Jaguar dealer "facilitates" sale of L/R Rover; L/R Rover owner wants a summer car for the beach house and L/R Rover dealer "facilitates" the purchase of an F-Type).
================================================
Jaguar - it's not an automobile, it's a Motorcar
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
GGG's Avatar
GGG
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 120,439
Likes: 17,005
From: Durham, UK
Default

The JAGUAR SUV doesn't appeal to me but I'm looking forward to the release of the LAND ROVER Coupe to replace the XK.

Graham
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
desertchimera's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 190
Likes: 12
From: Lubbock Texas
Default

It's design to compete with the Lamborghini and maserati SUV. I thinks it's pretty neat but not functional. Land rover doesn't have anything to worry about because they are more family oriented. The cost in US dollars is 49000 or £30000 from what I have read and it's for the 20-30 yr old niches. I love the futuristic electronics and lighting. I am sure they will change things as it's hits production and gets feedback from the car shows. It's a crossover but I don't think anyone in their right mind would take any of those that I mention and take them off-roading like you would a land rover that has proven itself in many countries
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 05:56 PM
  #7  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,520
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by GGG
The JAGUAR SUV doesn't appeal to me but I'm looking forward to the release of the LAND ROVER Coupe to replace the XK.

Graham
C'mon Graham, I made that joke months ago!

It's pretty obvious who the target demographic for the CX17 is; my wife (who just got a Freelander 2) saw the CX-17 in a Jaguar magazine & announced, without prompting "wow that's cool, i'd drive that"

I tried very hard to get her into a Range Rover or a Land Rover, but it wasn't easy, and there were some very convincing arguments from her.

Defender - Are you crazy? I'm not a farmer!
Full Fat Range Rover - It's too big!
Range Rover Sport - It's too big!
Range Rover Evoque - Ugly, looks like a Stormtrooper helmet, wasn't it designed by Victoria Beckham?
Discovery - Way too big and damn ugly, looks like a box!
Freelander 2 - I like it, it's not so big & ugly like the others.

And then the CX-17 - It's a Jag, oh wow, I like it.

The X-Type Sportwagon & XF Sportbrake weren't/aren't sold in Australia (long story) but in any case the answer is "no way am I driving a station wagon"

So there you have it, the CX-17 is the car that women want when they don't want an Evoque.

I kind of get the Stormtrooper helmet bit...





But they also remind me of Marvin the Paranoid Android





But getting back on topic, the CX-17 will sell, just not to the traditional Jag customers....
 
Attached Thumbnails Cx17-evoque1.jpg   Cx17-evoque2.jpg   Cx17-evoque3.jpg   Cx17-evoque4.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 08:28 PM
  #8  
desertchimera's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 190
Likes: 12
From: Lubbock Texas
Default

The same body style is out there right now from Nissan to Ford.....most drivers of these crossovers are women or what is called the CEO moms, those that make home decisions from shopping to finances.

Regardless if you like it or not, it's going to sell, and the amenities and futuristic look is a breath of fresh air, when the s type came out, I heard things like it's to stuffy and fake looking plastic interior on the earlier models, it looks like a ford interior. The status quo throughout the world demands SUVs or crossovers. Wonder if they will make a jaguar mini van lol.....

$41,675 Starting MSRP1
$366/mo 36 months lease
$5268 due at signing
*Security deposit waived
Prices for Mar 26, 2014
and ZIP
EPA-Est. MPG
City/Hwy 2 16/22
Search Dealer Inventory
Request a Local Quote
Estimate Your Payment
Compare to Other Models

Ford sport

If the jaguar cx17 price is correct, I would go with it instead of the ford I posted

Specs
Engine: 3.0-litre S/C V6
Transmission: 8-spd auto, four-wheel drive
0-62mph: 6.0 seconds (est)
Top speed: 155mph
Economy: 35mpg (est)
CO2: 199g/km

2015 Jaguar C-X17 SUV price and release date
The expected price is £30,000 while this model on the market appear at the beginning of 2015.

30,000.00 Pounds Sterling equals
49,728.15 US Dollars

1 GBP equals 1.66 USD · MSN Money

Maserati Kubang SUV revealed in Frankfurt [videos]http://youtu.be/RhmIFlohHIw

2014 Lamborghini Urus SUV official Photos - Live pictures 2013 2015 concept prototype - YouTube

2014 Porsche Cayenne - Luxury SUV | 5 Reasons To Buy | AutoTrader.com - YouTube
 
Attached Images   

Last edited by Cambo; Mar 26, 2014 at 09:45 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 03:43 AM
  #9  
Richard Moss's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 158
Likes: 32
From: Abu Dhabi
Default

It's a smart move for Jaguar and I'm sure that it will be a great success. I quite like it but (as with all modern cars) I like it less than I like older vehicles
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2014 | 08:15 AM
  #10  
John Fox's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 80
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

I think I will like the production model better since this is a dressed up show piece. That being said the wife loves the look of it and given Im looking for my next Jag (car for me) so she can transition into my Range Rover I think she will like it even more given the RR is a full size HSE. Plus knowing her (very frugal Asian) the gas mileage will be the selling factor. In the end whatever I have to do to keep her from a Benz I will ( I don't agree they are the greatest vehicles ever made), LOL. Thankfully I have some time and she wont want a new one, LOL, hates that first year depreciation.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2014 | 07:49 PM
  #11  
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 707
Likes: 102
From: San Anselmo
Default

What is the US release date? Any news on this?
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 10:13 AM
  #12  
Dino V's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 98
Likes: 7
From: Chicago
Default

Not bad, definitely think this car has potential.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.