S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Check engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #21  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,493
Likes: 4,895
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Until recently throttles were not sealed units containing high-precision actuators and sensors controlled electronically and responsible for idle, cruise and all other throttle functions with so-called fail-safe etc features. Cars from just a few years ago had rather ordinary throttle bodies which could not fail in the current ways but also could not meet new emissions etc laws. Sorry, but over the years just doesn't count Heck, over the years catalytic convertors didn't fail cos there weren't none LOL. I preferred the old laws and old throttles but we appear to be forced into the new stuff.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #22  
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 195
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by jagv8
I preferred the old laws and old throttles but we appear to be forced into the new stuff.
OK, now I disagree, a bit. The "old" way would not be able to produce a 300hp 4.2L stock V8, or a 230 hp 3.0 V6, or a 168hp 2.4L 4.... (yes my damn Honda's come up again) Tech has it's challenges but we experiencing a renewed level of performance.. Did we ever think the day would come when a slightly above average sedan would out perform the revered muscle cars of the past?
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #23  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,493
Likes: 4,895
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Er, I meant for reliability (what the thread's about). That's why I drive a car with no excess computers or electronics..... an S-Type R. Oh, wait. Oops.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #24  
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 195
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by jagv8
Er, I meant for reliability (what the thread's about). That's why I drive a car with no excess computers or electronics..... an S-Type R. Oh, wait. Oops.
And I'll say this... Despite the OMG threads...Overall new tech cars are a whole ton more reliable than the old stuff as well.... Last car to strand me, personally, for a failure, was an 83 Chevy. Damn I wish that Monte had a limp home feature when the PCM started failing.......

Now on the other side of things... I did find it extremely odd that my buds at the dealer did an entire reversal on me the last time we talked. They were ones that ensured me that it was perfectly fine to do the whole engine clean thing that I have always done. No worries... Then when I was in last time they specifically told me.."...now don't go washing everything under here. Water can do some really bad stuff in there." When I asked them why change from a year ago... They said, "well we know how **** you can be.." Honestly, they have always known how **** I can be. I actually think that they are realizing that there is a reason to be careful and that some of these systems warrant extra care when it comes to maintenance. The thing is, how do you communicate that without creating unnecessary issues of liability.

I knew I shouldn't have gotten involved in this....
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronadomike
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
69
Jan 22, 2026 10:13 PM
D.K
XF and XFR ( X250 )
50
Dec 10, 2023 02:05 AM
scottatl
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
2
Sep 4, 2015 08:08 PM
KarimPA
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
Sep 3, 2015 07:32 PM
OkieTim
Jaguar Forums Feedback & Suggestion Center
2
Sep 2, 2015 12:48 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.