S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Exhaust Piping....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
vance580's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 218
From: Atlanta, GA
Default Exhaust Piping....

I have a question. I have a set of Magnaflow mufflers and will be getting some high flow cats, etc. My question is since I know someone who welds so we are gonna just weld in everything using the existing 2.25" piping for now with reducers to go up to 2.5" which is what the components will be. Will I even notice that much of a difference if I stick with the 2.25" as compared to later when I switch out all the piping to 2.5"? Is that .25" really gonna make that much of a difference in sound, power etc?? Any thoughts, opinions, evidence??
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 04:54 PM
  #2  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by vance580
I have a question. I have a set of Magnaflow mufflers and will be getting some high flow cats, etc. My question is since I know someone who welds so we are gonna just weld in everything using the existing 2.25" piping for now with reducers to go up to 2.5" which is what the components will be. Will I even notice that much of a difference if I stick with the 2.25" as compared to later when I switch out all the piping to 2.5"? Is that .25" really gonna make that much of a difference in sound, power etc?? Any thoughts, opinions, evidence??
Excellent question Vance, I'm glad you asked. I did a lot of research on this topic to make my final decision to stay with the stock piping at 2.25 all the way through. I never noticed any loss of low end torque as a few have stated like Bfs. My conclusion is that b/c of those guys increasing the stock pipping to 2.5 instead of using what was stock 2.25 caused the low end torque loss. Final analyses, staying with .25 will not affect the sound, but performance might be questionable due to using 2.5 pipping causing slight loss at low torque end.

Hope I could help out brother, and good luck on the welds, I have some pics of my Hi flow cats somewhere in older posts of mine, take a look at how I placed the 02 sensors if you have any doubts.

****Update: link to pics of CAts installed! https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=43505
Peace!
 

Last edited by jag79; Feb 28, 2011 at 08:04 PM. Reason: uploaded link to cats pics
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
vance580's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 218
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Yea the welding should be good cause by we will be welding I really meant he will be welding and I'll be giving him the ata boys. LOL. I have never welded and he has been welding since he was little.
Depending on the output of this topic I may just stick with the stock size and not go up in the future. But I may still stick with 2.5 with reducers at the components just so I have the option.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 05:19 PM
  #4  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by vance580
Yea the welding should be good cause by we will be welding I really meant he will be welding and I'll be giving him the ata boys. LOL. I have never welded and he has been welding since he was little.
Depending on the output of this topic I may just stick with the stock size and not go up in the future. But I may still stick with 2.5 with reducers at the components just so I have the option.
No problems amigo, let me know how you like the outcome of it . I'm sure you will be turning heads on campus with that sound
 

Last edited by jag79; Feb 28, 2011 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

Forgot to ask what size tips are you going to go with? 4" maybe???
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
vance580's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 218
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by jag79
Forgot to ask what size tips are you going to go with? 4" maybe???
Yes you are correct. I will more then likely have the same tips as you. Wish I could find a pic of the 4" tips on an 05+ body style since the rear valance is a little different. Not sure if the openings are the same size as the stock size seems to fill them quite well. I dont want to have to cut the openings bigger.
Anyone with an 05+ got pics of some 4" tips on?
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #7  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by vance580
Yes you are correct. I will more then likely have the same tips as you. Wish I could find a pic of the 4" tips on an 05+ body style since the rear valance is a little different. Not sure if the openings are the same size as the stock size seems to fill them quite well. I dont want to have to cut the openings bigger.
Anyone with an 05+ got pics of some 4" tips on?
Awesome! Your STR is going to be one bad *** Jag!

If my memory serves me correct one of the members here "Stypernut" has 4" tips on his 05' STR, take a look here https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/s...t=40926&page=4
You could ask him more about the valence for the rear on the 05's.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 07:17 PM
  #8  
uropnm6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 271
Likes: 17
From: syracuse NY
Default

+1 With that stay with the 2.25 stock pipe, keep the low end torque, It is all good quality stainless steel will last forever.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
Kapitan1975's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 19
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by vance580
Yes you are correct. I will more then likely have the same tips as you. Wish I could find a pic of the 4" tips on an 05+ body style since the rear valance is a little different. Not sure if the openings are the same size as the stock size seems to fill them quite well. I dont want to have to cut the openings bigger.
Anyone with an 05+ got pics of some 4" tips on?

Hi vance
i got mine with a 4"inch tail pipe. (and mine is 05 STR)
i did my muffler with set of magnaflows i do believe it was 2.5in, as i remember the muffler store i went recommended a step up when reaching towards the end (muffler, if you step down, there will be a bottle neck... something like that)

i love the sound on the magnaflows.. not too loud.. just nice...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg8570NvlPM (this is before the magnaflows)
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 10:51 PM
  #10  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

I wonder what this guy put on his jaguar STR over in the UK, it sounds fckn' crazy . Take a look.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo3nd...eature=related
 

Last edited by jag79; Feb 28, 2011 at 11:00 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 08:14 AM
  #11  
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,084
Likes: 432
From: NY
Default

Dudes. Before useing 2 1/2" pipe for my full exhaust mod, I mentioned in threads that I felt the stock 2 1/4" was adequate and would maintain low end trq. up to 475 hp. I succumbed to 2 1/2" because others felt the opposite was true if high level of mods were to be added to attain power beyond 475 hp...500+ hp. Though I cont. to feel that 2 1/4" pipe is adequate to support up to 475 hp, 2 1/2" can be used when coupled with muffler components that slow down escaping gases. This is one of the reasons I discarded the Magnaflow's in favor of a pair of 12" Walker glass packed tube resonators leading to a pair of Dynomax Super Turbos'. Aside from a quieter yet still aggressive exhaust note, my butt-dyno feels the return of low end trq. You'll observe both the new n/a and s/c 5 litre Jags use 2 1/2" pipe with glass packed pre-mufflers and glass packed chambered mufflers (similar design as the Dynomax Super Turbo's). The reason for this is not soley due to increased displacement but to freer flowing incoming air intake charges, etc. This is what's happening with our STR's as we mod em. Example: K&N a/f to 4" free flowing air intake elbows, to ported/polished blowers with smaller pulley's spinning them faster (what about the massive amount of air churned by a future twin screw?), ECU tunes that increase ignition lead and fuel curves, hi-flow cats allowing spent exhaust gases to escape faster which in turn cause more complete scavenging of cylinders...this process requires more air to be pulled in from the intake-down= larger diameter pipe. By the way, 2 1/4" pipe makes for a louder exhaust than 2 1/2" pipe due to the freer flowing (less air friction) characteristics of 2 1/2" versus 2 1/4". The Magnaflows are quieter than the Super Turbo's at light throttle during cruise, but much louder than the Super Turbos' when dipping further into the pedal at a stop or cruise. I wrote a thread a while back: "Don't lose too much back pressure". Hope this helps guys.
 

Last edited by bfsgross; Mar 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #12  
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 251
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

A muffler that I have been looking at is the new Dynomax VT series. It is more of a straight-through design, but has a valve that closes at part throttle (highway cruising) to help eliminate some of the noise.

http://www.dynomax.com/mufflers.php?muffler=vt
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #13  
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,084
Likes: 432
From: NY
Default

Thanks Mike. The Dynomax VT muffler may be the "Missing link" for having the best of both worlds?
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #14  
jag79's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 86
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

After getting my Magnaflows installed awhile back I had Second thoughts; I took a gamble with the Magnaflows over the Dynomax VT at the time. I still love the Magnaflows but I should have went with the Dynomax VT's instead after reading a thread on the test results of people who actually tried them out and giving their opinions about it. http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-eng...y-muffler.html

Down the line, I might change over to the Dynomax VT to cancel out the drone. It isn't too bad with the Magnaflows, but it would be better if the drone sound was a lot less than what it is now. Anyhow thanks for mentioning about the Dyno Vt' mufflers Mike! Let us know how they are after you get them installed. I have been following that thread for a very long time and people are giving mix reviews about it, it has its pros and cons just like any product.

Cheers!
 

Last edited by jag79; Mar 1, 2011 at 04:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,084
Likes: 432
From: NY
Default

Vettes sound quiet till they are opened up due to this technology.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boiler
US Southwest
4
Dec 20, 2025 12:38 AM
Poet
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
8
Feb 7, 2025 02:18 PM
XJ8JR
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
2
Oct 2, 2015 12:13 AM
baskervillema
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
4
Oct 1, 2015 06:43 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.