S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Max rwhp with stock S type R fuel system?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-22-2010, 02:58 PM
qwiketz's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Default Max rwhp with stock S type R fuel system?

What is the max hp that you've made with a stock fuel system and with a eaton m112 blower? I know Avos has made more with a TS, but that is a more efficient blower. I'm just curious to see how much headroom I may or may not have in regards to fuel system.

thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:31 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

I've read here that the STR's fuel system provides adequate delivery to 500 h.p.
 
  #3  
Old 06-22-2010, 06:48 PM
qwiketz's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

is that crank hp? I'm hoping to be really close to there (400+ rwhp). Thanks for the response.
 
  #4  
Old 06-22-2010, 09:02 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

qwiketz, I've read here that the stock STR fuel system can support 500 crank h.p. Avos can verify this as he modified an STR to the tune of 500+ h.p. and numerous other late model Jags.
 
  #5  
Old 06-23-2010, 02:11 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,615
Received 1,062 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

The 4.2 engine is already putting out 400 BHP, and needs another 60 (in stock form) to drive the Eaton. This means that the engine is putting out 460/470 BHP already. I have no idea how far you can go with the Eaton, as the power consumption is not linear when you spin it faster, it will be progressively more until a point that it costs more HP to turn than you get out of it.

To give some ida, on the STR you can get at least about 430 rwhp with the TS, which would be 520 BHP (17% drive train loss) and I would guess the TS takes about 80 hp to turn, so in total 600 BHP.

I think there is still more in the fueling system, so that will not be the bottleneck, think temp and intake for more horses!
 
  #6  
Old 06-23-2010, 02:35 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Yes, and use the XFR for ideas. (E.g. the air intake for more and cold, not engine bay, air.)
 
  #7  
Old 06-23-2010, 05:35 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Avos, aside from the twin screw conversion you performed for a customers STR, is there one readily available for all STR's? Is there a more efficient s/c expansion/cooling tank available to cool water to air temperatures? Last, would you advize a loweremperature thermostat as that available from Euro Toys?
 
  #8  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:08 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Looks like the SC cooling doesn't really involve that tank. Look at the cooling circuit and think
 
  #9  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:28 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

With increased boost wouldn't we be interested in dropping or maintaining engine temps. which in turn drops or maintains S/C temp.?
 
  #10  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:35 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,615
Received 1,062 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

As far as I know no one has made a TS kit for a STR, which I understand as the space is very tight.

I tried a colder thermostat on the STR, but the ECU didn't like it as it measures how long it takes until the engine coolant has reached operating temp, and threw DTC P0128. Could be because of our colder climate, or that the thermostat would just open quicker so it took longer, not sure. We put the stock thermostat back, as the TS doesn't stress the engine so much.

Cooling the air after the SC is where you can reduce the performance loss, so this is an important area and even more so for the Eaton.

You could consider a better intercooler radiator (not thicker as some do!) and/or add an extra tank of a gallon or 2 in the intercooler circuit. That will give you some buffer before the system can’t get rid of the heat anymore. Or try other means like the http://www.killerchiller.com or alky systems.
 

Last edited by avos; 06-23-2010 at 07:48 AM.
  #11  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:56 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
With increased boost wouldn't we be interested in dropping or maintaining engine temps. which in turn drops or maintains S/C temp.?
What makes you think "in turn" is what would happen? Hint: look at the cooling circuits.

There is IAT2. I expect you want to raise as little as possible the temp it measures. So, monitor IAT2 and do something to remove or avoid heat.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrentGardner
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
26
04-17-2024 05:19 PM
Stoney85
Australia - New South Wales / ACT
2
06-10-2021 09:14 PM
Stoney85
Australia - Queensland
2
06-07-2021 11:49 PM
stanjag
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
2
08-30-2015 10:35 AM
EastFalk
X-Type ( X400 )
1
08-29-2015 08:22 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Max rwhp with stock S type R fuel system?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.