S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

S Type LSD? Lincoln LS Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 12-17-2012, 10:33 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: No. NJ
Posts: 3,107
Received 219 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clubairth1
Yes.
Jaguar S Type Gen I - 1999-2002
Jaguar S Type Gen II - 2003-2008
With another smaller update for the 2005-2008 cars..
So what's the deal with the 2005-2008 update?

Anyone know and does it affect this project?

Maybe this is what I mistakenly thought was the Gen I to Gen II change and was about addressing noise?
 
  #42  
Old 12-17-2012, 10:37 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: No. NJ
Posts: 3,107
Received 219 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Yeah I'd like to hear more details about that and I am interested in the real world effects that this sort of change would have on the DSC which I find rather crude right now.

He''s be an interesting one to have elaborate on this subject.

It's not just dry street traction/performance I'm concerned about.

Originally Posted by bfsgross
Avos just wrote me that he personally prefers the clutch-pack differentials (such as the Ford Traction-Lok), and that these work better with the S-Types DSC system. Looking foward to speaking with DTS tomorrow, and will report back to this thread.
 
  #43  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:28 PM
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 3,899
Received 801 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

The 2005-2008 update was pretty much just cosmetics. We did get some more changes later on. The big one was replacing the Brembo’s with the standard single piston brake system for 2006-2008 on the STR.
.
.
.
 
  #44  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:21 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Today I spoke with Eric of DTS. We spoke for a few minutes. He's somewhat familiar with the Lincoln LS 8" rear and was sort of surprised Jag did something different. I reminded him the STR has 400 chp and would need more beef in the rear. He mentioned it would all come together once he has our carrier in his shop. He has my cars VIN and will call me soon. I also directed him to our thread. So, let's see....
 
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (12-18-2012)
  #45  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:29 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Please remind them that it's not just the STR, it's also the 4.2L X350 and 4.2L X150 that will benefit from this sort of conversion kit.
And there are STR, XJR, XKR enthusiasts all over the world who are interested in this
 
  #46  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:50 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo351
Please remind them that it's not just the STR, it's also the 4.2L X350 and 4.2L X150 that will benefit from this sort of conversion kit.
And there are STR, XJR, XKR enthusiasts all over the world who are interested in this
Yep Cambo. I let him know that the V6 and V8 have the same rear but with different gear ratio, and different Jags models are interested in a LSD.
 
  #47  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:22 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default Need Rear Cover information

Eric of DTS called today. He contacted Ford and Jaguar. Ford gave him some info. but nothing from Jag. He needs info from differential cover. Is there any numbers, names, etc. Tomorrow I'm taking a pic of the differential cover. He said if it doesn't have Ford stamped on it, it may be a Dana rear. Of course he said if he had a carrier with him it would be easy to identify and likely fit a LSD. Eric also said one way to decipher wether Ford or Dana is to order a side seal of the carrier (where axles pass through). If it crosses as a Ford part then we have a Ford differential. He recommends a non-clutch differential, as the clutches will wear. If I soon put my STR up for the winter, I will have the indy Jag mechanic remove the differential and ship it to DTS. Any info guys?
 
  #48  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:40 PM
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 3,899
Received 801 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

Yes. See pictures below. They contain all the numbers from a 2003 STR.
.
.
.


 
Attached Thumbnails S Type LSD? Lincoln LS Install-2003-s-type-r-rear-differential1.jpg   S Type LSD? Lincoln LS Install-2003-s-type-r-rear-differential2.jpg  
The following 3 users liked this post by tbird6:
bfsgross (12-19-2012), McJaguar (12-20-2012), Panthro (12-20-2012)
  #49  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:55 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Way to go tbird! Spoke to Eric (DTS). He'll visit this thread to garner the info. off tbirds differential. Again, the V6 and V8 use the same differential thus the same LSD. Stock ring and pinion must be retained for both.
 

Last edited by bfsgross; 12-19-2012 at 02:15 PM.
  #50  
Old 12-19-2012, 04:08 PM
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 3,899
Received 801 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

No problem. The pictures are from a 2003 and I have a 2005 STR. But I can't find any differences other than the gear ratio for any S Type differential. Or Lincoln LS. The two cars have different ratios so if we ever get programming to allow us S Types to change the rear end gear we will have a 3.58 ratio option from the LS. This ratio on a STR would be a BIG improvement over the stock 2.87!

In fact Jaguar did something similar with the XF but only went to 3.31.
.
.
.
 

Last edited by tbird6; 12-19-2012 at 04:32 PM.
  #51  
Old 12-19-2012, 05:59 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Spoke with Eric again. He said we have the same 8" Ford differential as the Lincoln LS, except our rear cover has cooling fins. He feels 95% that we can use the 8.8" Auburn, Traction-Lok, or Tru-Trac differentials, which he recommends over the other two due to its low cost and stronger build. The cost would be: $240 labor + $173 new bearings all around + $445 for the Tru-Trac differential= $859 plus tax. If four or more send their carriers he'll likely take off nearly $100. Wonder if we can purchase Tru-Trac for less than $445? Eric has the Lincoln LS carrier and is going to try to set it up as a LSD. This way we don't disassembal prior to definitely knowing this will work.
 

Last edited by bfsgross; 12-19-2012 at 06:01 PM.
  #52  
Old 12-19-2012, 09:28 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,295
Received 251 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

Make sure he is aware the gen1 and gen2 diffs are different, and the 03+ STR's use the newer gen2 design. I don't think those are as compatible with the 8.8...

If this confirmed working for an 03 STR pumpkin, I will strongly consider sending them mine over the winter...
 
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (12-20-2012)
  #53  
Old 12-20-2012, 06:24 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT42R
Make sure he is aware the gen1 and gen2 diffs are different, and the 03+ STR's use the newer gen2 design. I don't think those are as compatible with the 8.8...

If this confirmed working for an 03 STR pumpkin, I will strongly consider sending them mine over the winter...
Thanks for the Generation 2 reminder. I'll call Eric of DTS and bring this point up.
 
  #54  
Old 12-20-2012, 07:50 AM
McJaguar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 677
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I just poked into this thread for the first time. Great Job you guys! Thanks to y'all who've carried it this far.
I don't know what I have to contribute, other than a big "I'm IN!" once it's confirmed doable & affordable (as it seems it'll be)

I'll continue to watch closely, so that if three's something I can help with, I'll be timely about it! :-)

Looking forward to updates.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by McJaguar:
bfsgross (12-20-2012), Panthro (12-20-2012)
  #55  
Old 12-20-2012, 08:13 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: No. NJ
Posts: 3,107
Received 219 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Having done this to a couple of my other cars, one a track car and the other a street car I'd be concerned about the gas mileage on the street car with a 3.58 if we're currently running a 2.87. That's going to require software changes too. Yeah I know it's no gas miser anyway but frankly it's fast enough already for my purposes. My track car went from a 3.31 to a 3.90 and 0-60 went to 4.1 but the car also gets caught out at redline in a number of situation at the tracks I frequent so I bout a different ratio diff to swap in.

I just want better and smoother control which I'm hoping will we'll get? What has AVOS had to say about how the switch to a LSD has performed in that regard?

Any surprises pleasant or otherwise?

Originally Posted by tbird6
No problem. The pictures are from a 2003 and I have a 2005 STR. But I can't find any differences other than the gear ratio for any S Type differential. Or Lincoln LS. The two cars have different ratios so if we ever get programming to allow us S Types to change the rear end gear we will have a 3.58 ratio option from the LS. This ratio on a STR would be a BIG improvement over the stock 2.87!

In fact Jaguar did something similar with the XF but only went to 3.31.
.
.
.
 

Last edited by Staatsof; 12-20-2012 at 08:17 AM.
  #56  
Old 12-20-2012, 08:51 AM
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 3,899
Received 801 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

It won't be a problem with the ZF 6 speed. I would guess your other car was only a 4 speed manual or 3 speed auto. We have such an overdrive ratio in the ZF I don't think you would see much difference.

I know the 2009 XF (with the lower 3.31 ratio) fuel mileage is still rated almost the same as the old S Type with the 2.87 ratio. They both have the same 4.2L and 6 sp ZF transmission.

I guess it will take some real on the road numbers to know for sure.
.
.
.
 
  #57  
Old 12-20-2012, 09:10 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default 2009 XF electronic differential

Originally Posted by tbird6
It won't be a problem with the ZF 6 speed. I would guess your other car was only a 4 speed manual or 3 speed auto. We have such an overdrive ratio in the ZF I don't think you would see much difference.

I know the 2009 XF (with the lower 3.31 ratio) fuel mileage is still rated almost the same as the old S Type with the 2.87 ratio. They both have the same 4.2L and 6 sp ZF transmission.

I guess it will take some real on the road numbers to know for sure.
.
.
.
The beauty of the late model Jags is that they have electronic differentials that swap to and fro low and high ratios. IMO, the same 3.30 found in the V6 would serve an all around purpose. Last night some ******* slashed all four tires on my 03 STR while it was parked behind my office. So between mitigating (insurance vandalism claim) that I'll call Eric at DTS to remind him we have the Gen. II 8" rear.
 
  #58  
Old 12-20-2012, 09:25 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Spoke with Eric regarding Gen I vs Gen II 8" carriers. He isn't aware of any physical differences. Does anyone know the physical differences between the two? I told him there was grinding down of our carrier to fit the Quaif differential.
 
  #59  
Old 12-20-2012, 12:53 PM
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 3,899
Received 801 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

The electronic differential does not contain different gear ratios. All it does is switch from an open diff (0% locking) to various amounts of locking, up to 100%. The amount of lock up is controlled by the PCM electronically. This gives the LSD a very fine control that you don’t have with the mechanical versions.

Most LSD are mechanical and go into action when one tire spins more than the other. Regardless with what’s happening to the rest of the car.

Well they won't interchange with each other so he better keep looking!!

.
.
.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by tbird6:
bfsgross (12-20-2012), Panthro (12-20-2012)
  #60  
Old 12-20-2012, 01:02 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Guys, forget about a ratio swap. I've been down every avenue to find someone who can reprogram the TCM, even ZF themselves, and everyone said no.

Now, getting back to the LSD. As previously mentioned I know a guy in the UK who had the Quaife unit installed in his X350 XJR, no grinding/machining needed.

The difference is which centre you get. The QDF3W is the one to suit the STR, X350 and early X150's. The QDF5W is for the earlier X100 & the X308.

We saw in the photos in Panthros post HERE that the diff center in the Gen2 is a bit shorter/slimmer than the Gen1, this is the problem why the internals are not a straight swap.
 


Quick Reply: S Type LSD? Lincoln LS Install



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.