XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

Making a few XFR mods.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #1  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default Making a few XFR mods.....

I have a 2010 XFR.

Well Ive decided I'm going to add a few hp's to an already fast and powerful car.

Making a pully change, cat back exhaust and having a dyno tune done. Ive been told I should see increases of upwards to 60 rwhp. We shall see.

Pully and tune will be done this sat (4-16) and exhaust a few weeks later.

I'll let the forum know the improvements.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 01:13 AM
  #2  
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,070
From: Europe
Default

Would also be interested to know what the current rwhp is, will you do a before dyno?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 09:42 AM
  #3  
ajmarton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Default

Hey Todd,
I would be interested in buying your OEM exhaust. I have the premium XF and like the XFR tips. Sound note may change too - who knows. PM me if you're interested. Andrew in LA
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 10:09 PM
  #4  
VetteOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 18
From: Aspen Hill, Maryland
Default

Todd, who's doing the work?
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #5  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by VetteOwner
Todd, who's doing the work?

555 Motorsports from Chicago area is the tuner and Komet Motorsports is doing the instal.

Just had a base dyno pull done today. All I can say is HOLY **** that motor is strong before and mods being done.

I have a feeling Jag is underrating the 510 hp rating.

They got 460 rwhp and 420 lbs of torque.

Even at 20% pwertrain loss the rwhp should be about 410. I mean thats a big heavy car. 20% loss would be rezable.

The tuner was amazed. All the guys were say how strong that motor is. The torque band jumped upat 2300 rpms and stayed flat all the way thru the rpm band.

Cant wait to get the mods done now.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 01:01 AM
  #6  
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,070
From: Europe
Default

Thanks for sharing the dyno results.

Can you tell if the 460 HP measured was actual rear wheel power, or calculated engine power on the graph? Also what dyno type was it? This way I can interpret the values better.

The ECU is limiting the torque actually, which is probably why you saw a almost flat line. Just by taking that away you will gain conisderable amount of extra torque in mid range.

Forgot to add, where these figures SAE corrected or actual ones?
 

Last edited by avos; Apr 17, 2011 at 01:16 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 01:30 PM
  #7  
Redjaguar100's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 72
From: Philadelpha Pa
Default

I would love to find out the end result of your Mods... It sounds great..
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #8  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by avos
Thanks for sharing the dyno results.

Can you tell if the 460 HP measured was actual rear wheel power, or calculated engine power on the graph? Also what dyno type was it? This way I can interpret the values better.

The ECU is limiting the torque actually, which is probably why you saw a almost flat line. Just by taking that away you will gain conisderable amount of extra torque in mid range.

Forgot to add, where these figures SAE corrected or actual ones?

I'm looking at the dyno sheet......

Its a Mustang Dyno, actual rwhp. Dont know about SAE corrected, I'll have to ask about that.


460.6 rwhp @ 6303 rpms
420.8 ft lbs @ 2656 rpms
 

Last edited by ToddsXFR; Apr 18, 2011 at 07:05 PM. Reason: added info
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 12:38 PM
  #9  
Johnny Vig's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 49
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

Good luck with the mods Todd. For now I will be living thru you. Where did you buy the parts, and if you don't mind sharing can you let us know the investment of your mods. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 01:35 AM
  #10  
duke_dallas's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Likes: 22
From: Dallas, TX
Default

subscribed
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #11  
Blackcoog's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 204
Default

Mustang dynos typically read a bit lower than others so keep that in mind too. I wouldn't doubt if the cars were underrated a bit.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
Need4Spd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 306
Likes: 31
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Can you tell us what parts were used (e.g. for cat back exhaust), pulleys, etc.? As for exhaust, how does it sound? Any droning?
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Havent got any of it done yet. Ive been out of town for the last coupleof weeks. Hoping to get it done this next week.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 10:08 AM
  #14  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

The pully and exhaust come form Mina Gallery out of California.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 04:43 PM
  #15  
Need4Spd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 306
Likes: 31
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Originally Posted by ToddsXFR
The pully and exhaust come form Mina Gallery out of California.
Thanks. I just checked their website and FYI, the exhaust listed says it's only for XF and not XFR.

Jaguar XF Performance Exhaust

5. This kit will fit the XF and XF Supercharged models. It will not fit the XFR.
FWIW, Quicksilver has an exhaust that fits the XFR. It is significantly louder than the stock exhaust, however.

Jaguar XFR 5.0 Super Charged 'Sports' Exhaust - QuickSilver Exhaust Systems
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #16  
ToddsXFR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

They do have one for the XFR as well. You are right, its not listed on their website. Its a cat back exhaust. No where near as loud as the Quick silver I'm told. More like the Arden exhaust. Just a nice low deep rumble. It however is taking a bit longer than they originally told me to get the exhaust in. Not sure why, but will be finding out monday.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 10:08 AM
  #17  
Need4Spd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 306
Likes: 31
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Originally Posted by ToddsXFR
They do have one for the XFR as well. You are right, its not listed on their website. Its a cat back exhaust. No where near as loud as the Quick silver I'm told. More like the Arden exhaust. Just a nice low deep rumble. It however is taking a bit longer than they originally told me to get the exhaust in. Not sure why, but will be finding out monday.
Interesting. Please post about sound level and quality once you get your exhaust in.

There isn't much out there about the Quicksilver so let me comment. I bought it on recommendation of the dealer sales guy but am having second thoughts. It is fairly loud at certain RPM, almost muscle car loud, and there is some droning below 2000 RPM when going up grades on the freeway. I can avoid it by going above 2000 RPM, but need to choose gears via paddle shifter to keep it there, as the programming of auto mode selects a higher gear probably for fuel economy and to take advantage of the huge amount of torque.

I had a Tubi exhaust on my e39 M5 and the Quicksilver is much different. On
the M5, the Tubi had an exotic, higher pitched wailing sound at higher RPM and was not overly loud. It almost never droned unless also under 2000 RPM, but with a manual transmission, I would never be in that range. I wish they made a Tubi for the XFR but they don't as far as I can tell (it's not listed on any Tubi website).

Most sound clips of exhausts quite naturally are taken outside the car with the car revved from idle. That doesn't tell you the full story. What is important is also to get an idea of what it sounds like under load, as that changes the sound quality. For that you can do a drive-by with a friend outside and also have a mic inside.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2011 | 06:23 AM
  #18  
Stella431's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by ToddsXFR
I have a 2010 XFR.

Well Ive decided I'm going to add a few hp's to an already fast and powerful car.

Making a pully change, cat back exhaust and having a dyno tune done. Ive been told I should see increases of upwards to 60 rwhp. We shall see.

Pully and tune will be done this sat (4-16) and exhaust a few weeks later.

I'll let the forum know the improvements.
Which Exhaust system are you planning to use? Silverline, Quicksilver, arden. Which one do you feel is more good to use.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 01:16 PM
  #19  
XFactoR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 401
Likes: 71
From: New Jersey
Default

From what I can tell, Spires and Arden make the best exhaust kits. I want to get one, but worry that I'll regret it if its too loud and annoying. I also want the exhaust tips to look stock. Any comments on either of these?
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 04:53 PM
  #20  
Need4Spd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 306
Likes: 31
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Originally Posted by XFactoR
From what I can tell, Spires and Arden make the best exhaust kits. I want to get one, but worry that I'll regret it if its too loud and annoying. I also want the exhaust tips to look stock. Any comments on either of these?
I know the Quicksilver tips look stock, so no worries there. I think the Arden ones also look stock from the pics I've seen. The problem is there are so few cars with any aftermarket exhausts, and it's hard to really tell how loud they are from the sound clips on the web. Ideally you need to hear them in person. And there aren't even that many sound clips as far as I've been able to find!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.