XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Jag Head Bolts vs Lincoln LS Head bolts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 10:06 AM
  #1  
Roger77's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 505
Likes: 65
From: Goodyear AZ
Default Jag Head Bolts vs Lincoln LS Head bolts

I am rebuilding my XJR and looked at different sources for head bolts
The Jaguar Head bolts at parts geek.com (W0133-1786520) $14.25 ea
The Lincoln Head bolts at parts geek.com (5628-07075745) 34.25 set
Made by FEL-PRO
Do any of the techs on the forum have any input on if these bolts are OK to use?

The only difference I see is that the unthreaded section of the Jaguar bolts is slightly larger(.387" vs 0.350") but the Jaguar bolt is necked down to 0.350"
before the threads




 
Attached Thumbnails Jag Head Bolts vs Lincoln LS Head bolts-roger77-13105-albums-garage-fast-paws-4014-picture-head-bolts-17324.jpg   Jag Head Bolts vs Lincoln LS Head bolts-roger77-13105-albums-garage-fast-paws-4014-picture-head-close-up-17325.jpg   Jag Head Bolts vs Lincoln LS Head bolts-roger77-13105-albums-garage-fast-paws-4014-picture-thread-close-up-17326.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,835
Likes: 2,924
From: Douglasville Ga.
Default

The Lincoln bolt is probably a rolled thread while the Jag is a cut thread, and much stronger due to the larger dia. Have you checked Range Rover bolts. Someone on one of the forums found them equivalent to the Jag at a much lower price.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
Roger77's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 505
Likes: 65
From: Goodyear AZ
Default

Hi RJ both bolts are rolled, notice the jag bolt is necked down to the same core thread roll diameter (0.350")
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 11:44 AM
  #4  
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,835
Likes: 2,924
From: Douglasville Ga.
Default

Yes, I missed that. I hope one of the Techs will be able to help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,202
From: on-the-edge
Default

The two things I would be wondering about are:

-- clearance for the higher bolt head

-- whether the larger shank is required for lateral location
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 03:42 PM
  #6  
Roger77's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 505
Likes: 65
From: Goodyear AZ
Default

Plenty of room for the heads with washers, head is located with 2 steel rings on top outer edges of the head.

My concern is the elevated head pressure from a S/C application, but 2 bolts of the same material are only as strong as the smallest diameter. I think I will call FELPRO direct.
 

Last edited by Roger77; Feb 20, 2013 at 05:11 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #7  
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 1,426
From: Sunny Southport UK
Default

If you compare the OE Jag bolt to any one of the originals removed from the engine, you'll notice an ever so slightly longer bolt in the used one...

The OE Jag bolt has the decrease in diameter to promote necking or the stretching of the bolt in this area only. No such thing on the other one. This is why I bang on about factory torque angles. That's why they're expensive.

OE bolts all day for me. I've mentioned SC Range Rover head bolts do the job at a fraction of the cost, but apparently there's no saving on them in the USA...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolfy
XJ ( X351 )
58
May 28, 2024 08:06 AM
cissdm
X-Type ( X400 )
10
May 3, 2016 06:02 AM
Dz1rfj
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
5
Sep 16, 2015 03:44 PM
al_roethlisberger
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
7
Sep 11, 2015 10:04 PM
philwarner
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
16
Sep 5, 2015 10:05 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.