Leaper or no leaper?
Not allowed by law in the UK, hit somebody with it and it's a law suit.
On 60's Jag's, like the MKII and S type they look perfect, maybe get away with the XJS, but on the 308's and XK's I think they look wrong. I prefer a simple Growler badge.
On 60's Jag's, like the MKII and S type they look perfect, maybe get away with the XJS, but on the 308's and XK's I think they look wrong. I prefer a simple Growler badge.
Trending Topics
The Leaper is the quinticential Jaguar emblem.....BUT, looks out of place on XK8's and the latest generation.
I would never own an XJ series without one ;o)
I would never own an XJ series without one ;o)
The first S-Types ("X200" 1999–2002) are distinguished by a U-shaped centre console and optional touch-screen navigation system in the 2003 and later models. The traditional leaping jaguar hood ornament was optional even though it is approved by the US and EU standards and breaks away in the case of an accident.
I have to vote yes on the Leaper. Every XJ I've ever had had the leaper and I think it finishes the car beautifully.Of course, it looks completely out of place on the sporting models be it E type, XJ-S or XK8/XKR...
If you think Jaguar soul and character is "frou-frou" in nature, and is enhanced by gee-gaws then, yes, by all means go for the leaper !
No harm intended. Just fueling the fire a little

Cheers
DD
Petthesweaty-- I agree. I'm gonna miss the leaper on the newer jags. If I get one, I may have to add a leaper myself to the car, even though some think it looks funny. I don't. To me, that's what sets it apart as a jag!
Last edited by poodledoodledude; Jan 26, 2014 at 11:20 PM. Reason: Wrong verbiage
But personally, I don't think they look right on models after the X350.
Ok. It's an iconic geegaw. How's that?

IMHO Jags are gorgeous without them. I think they look "added on" no matter how you slice it. It's like gilding the lilly.
Cheers
DD









