XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Shock absorbers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2017 | 10:47 PM
  #21  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,370
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

They are not the same, one is for a car with CATS, the other is for a car without.
You will need to check what you have now.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2017 | 11:21 PM
  #22  
TexasXJR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: DTX
Default

CATS?
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2017 | 11:53 PM
  #23  
TexasXJR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: DTX
Default

Which is the best option for me? There is no electrical connection on the shock mounts. Also I have found a touring class and heavy duty. which are stock on the XJR
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2017 | 05:15 AM
  #24  
Col. Sandurz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 287
Likes: 55
From: SW Ohio
Default

These:
24-023726
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:28 AM
  #25  
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 662
Likes: 297
From: 'Out West', USA
Default

Originally Posted by Daim
I would like a little more stiffness whilst driving. The comfort is nice, but at higher Autobahn speeds, the softness is a little "tricky". And as the XJ is an ideal drift car (not kidding), a little firmer would be great What would you recommend?


I want my cars ride/handling to be like an E39 M5. Its not as far fetched as one might think. I work with a ride and handling vehicle dynamics expert and he says the weight distribution is good on our cars and the suspension geometry- so its primarily a case of matching the wheel rates.
I like the damper rates of the older Straight six 'R' variants- a little stiffer than our X308 Rs. Unfortunately the older X306 dampers have a different fixture at the front than the X308s. Springs can be tailor made.
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 09:58 PM
  #26  
coastaljag98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 546
Likes: 45
From: Apalachicola Florida
Default

Don’t waste your time with KYB. Just did this and they lasted about 5k miles. I just had to replace and went Bilstein on rear with new spring isolators. Can’t wait to change front ones too!
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 10:08 PM
  #27  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,370
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

Originally Posted by coastaljag98
Don’t waste your time with KYB. Just did this and they lasted about 5k miles. I just had to replace and went Bilstein on rear with new spring isolators. Can’t wait to change front ones too!
This is, unfortunately, not the first time I read about KYB and its very short life on our Jaguars .
I's the reason I went Bilstein too.
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 10:28 PM
  #28  
King Charles's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 1,028
From: North Carolina,USA
Default

Went w/ Sensen shocks here, zero complaints.
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 11:19 PM
  #29  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,370
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

Originally Posted by King Charles
Went w/ Sensen shocks here, zero complaints.
That's cause your car is in the transmission shop for a decade by now ...
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 11:51 PM
  #30  
King Charles's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 1,028
From: North Carolina,USA
Default

Originally Posted by ericjansen
That's cause your car is in the transmission shop for a decade by now ...
Albeit it rode much better in the miles prior to that lol.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 10:00 PM
  #31  
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 423
From: SF bay area
Default

Generally, it is very important to match the shocks to the spring rate, for the best ride and handling. The best matched shocks should be the oem ones, in this case Bilstein. They also happen to be the best quality around, pretty much. Very, very durable, in my experience.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 10:06 PM
  #32  
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 423
From: SF bay area
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
I want my cars ride/handling to be like an E39 M5. Its not as far fetched as one might think. I work with a ride and handling vehicle dynamics expert and he says the weight distribution is good on our cars and the suspension geometry- so its primarily a case of matching the wheel rates.
I like the damper rates of the older Straight six 'R' variants- a little stiffer than our X308 Rs. Unfortunately the older X306 dampers have a different fixture at the front than the X308s. Springs can be tailor made.
It's not going to handle like an E39, and you'll ruin it trying. That's OK, because the E39 ride is shockingly poor compared to the Jag. Your best bet is to restore the Jag to its original ride and handling - by replacing worn components. That begins with a careful examination of all the suspension components.

Does your ride and handling dynamics expert appreciate that the BMW is a 20 year newer design with tubular welded aluminum sub frames and sophisticated multi link front and rear suspension?
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2017 | 02:42 PM
  #33  
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 662
Likes: 297
From: 'Out West', USA
Default

Originally Posted by Mark SF
It's not going to handle like an E39, and you'll ruin it trying. That's OK, because the E39 ride is shockingly poor compared to the Jag. Your best bet is to restore the Jag to its original ride and handling - by replacing worn components. That begins with a careful examination of all the suspension components.

Does your ride and handling dynamics expert appreciate that the BMW is a 20 year newer design with tubular welded aluminum sub frames and sophisticated multi link front and rear suspension?

My friend disagrees with you. What's your background? I'm assuming you've worked for an OEM and have been involved in vehicle dynamics and ride and handling of several vehicles?


My friend has been involved in several OEM platforms and used to work for Pro-Drive.


He's a BMW nut like me and currently drives an XF. The control a multi link gives over a double wishbone set up is certainly better but its 'fine tuning' at best- the main points are that the weight distribution is similar (52:48) and some of the key chassis dimensions aren't a mile away.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2017 | 01:46 PM
  #34  
omgimali's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 107
From: Cheraw SC
Default

Bilsteins is the way to go. If you go to jaguar they will sell you the Bilsteins but for almost triple the price. Go to amazon and the Bilsteins are $100. If you own the Supercharged R varient of the XJ then go with the green sport shocks because they go with the sport spring. If you have the XJ8, VDP or L get the Black comfort standard shocks. If you put Sport shocks on the standard suspension the ride is going to be rough because of the Comfort springs.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 08:02 AM
  #35  
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 423
From: SF bay area
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
My friend disagrees with you. What's your background? I'm assuming you've worked for an OEM and have been involved in vehicle dynamics and ride and handling of several vehicles?


My friend has been involved in several OEM platforms and used to work for Pro-Drive.


He's a BMW nut like me and currently drives an XF. The control a multi link gives over a double wishbone set up is certainly better but its 'fine tuning' at best- the main points are that the weight distribution is similar (52:48) and some of the key chassis dimensions aren't a mile away.
No, weight distribution is only one factor. The first, and most important one, the foundation if you will, is structural stiffness. Without it you won't get a great handling car. It's something that is now 3 generations improved on an XF. The X308 structure was designed in the EARLY 80s. At the time, they did a good job. Now, it's ancient. I'm surprised your friend doesn't appreciate this as this is pretty basic stuff.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 08:11 AM
  #36  
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 662
Likes: 297
From: 'Out West', USA
Default

Originally Posted by Mark SF
No, weight distribution is only one factor. The first, and most important one, the foundation if you will, is structural stiffness. Without it you won't get a great handling car. It's something that is now 3 generations improved on an XF. The X308 structure was designed in the EARLY 80s. At the time, they did a good job. Now, it's ancient. I'm surprised your friend doesn't appreciate this as this is pretty basic stuff.
I cited the above but he said that you could still make vast improvements and those factors were smaller.
It's true the X308s torsional rigidity isn't that great by modern standards: 13,000 Nm/deg vs the current norm of 20,000 plus.
BMW quote 24,000 Nm/deg for the E39 but Jaguar found it was nearer 15,000. The BMW DOES benefit from laser welding.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 09:37 AM
  #37  
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 423
From: SF bay area
Default

Well, they're both about 10 tines better than my new XJSC cabriolet.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnken
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
11
Apr 8, 2018 10:21 AM
Chuck Schexnayder
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
33
Oct 24, 2015 10:20 PM
hoodun
XJS ( X27 )
26
Oct 6, 2015 08:34 PM
dmatthewman
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.