XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Tensioner lockdown question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-11-2018, 12:47 AM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Tensioner lockdown question

Hey guys quick question. I've checked Google and on here for my answer but have had no luck. If I have my cams locked and my drive plate locked with the setting plug through the access hole, can you then rotate the cams whithout casing damage to the timing whilst having the sprocket to camshaft bolt off? I was thinking about it and just couldn't make sense on how it would damage timing if the drive plate is locked with the setting plug at TDC? And made me believe even more so that no damage can occurs since in black onyx's DIY he clearly stated you can loosen the sprocket to cam bolt and rotate your cam accordingly if the flats don't line up with each other? Someone please clear this up for me.

And one other thing, with the new eurospare primaries I read a comment that mentioned you're not supposed to use the old backing plate, correct me if I'm wrong. When I installed the tensioner the small groove under the tensioner looked as if only a small portion of it lined up with the groove on the block where the oil is supposed to travel from to the tensioner. Am I just being paranoid or will the oil reach the new tensioner groove?
 
  #2  
Old 02-11-2018, 02:41 AM
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 5,906
Received 2,180 Likes on 1,583 Posts
Default

You can't rotate the camshafts with the lockig tools in place... That is why they are lockig tools. If you remove the tools, then yes, you can turn the cams.

Regarding the rear back in plates: once you have the lower tensioners off, you'll notice that they are a different shape. They are also thicker. That is because the backen plate has been integrated into the body.
 
The following users liked this post:
Don B (02-11-2018)
  #3  
Old 02-11-2018, 05:05 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PORNO
If I have my cams locked and my drive plate locked with the setting plug through the access hole, can you then rotate the cams whithout casing damage to the timing whilst having the sprocket to camshaft bolt off?
I guess you mean can you unlock the cams and rotate them, while the crankshaft is locked. If this is what you mean, then the answer is no. With the crankshaft locked, you can only rotate the cams a small amount around the position of their flats up (the position where the flats are when locked). If you rotate the cams too much away from the flats up, you risk bending the valves as some will come in contact with the pistons.
 
The following users liked this post:
Don B (02-11-2018)
  #4  
Old 02-11-2018, 09:15 AM
BobRoy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,527
Received 775 Likes on 466 Posts
Default

When the crankshaft locking tool is installed the timing is set at 45° ATDC. With the pistons in this position the valves will not come in contact with the pistons if the cams are rotated.

You cannot rotate the cams with the cam locking bars installed.

Here is a link to Motorcarman's engine repair manual.


http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Auto...Code%20168.pdf
 
The following users liked this post:
Don B (02-11-2018)
  #5  
Old 02-11-2018, 09:31 AM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daim
You can't rotate the camshafts with the lockig tools in place... That is why they are lockig tools. If you remove the tools, then yes, you can turn the cams.

Regarding the rear back in plates: once you have the lower tensioners off, you'll notice that they are a different shape. They are also thicker. That is because the backen plate has been integrated into the body.
I'm sorry, I think I wasn't clear enough. Let's say I have both crank and cams locked up. Can I then remove the camshaft locking plate and remove a camshaft and put it back without causing damage to the timing? there would be no reason for me to remove the camshaft, it's just that I'm curious and want to know. I thought about it, and was clear that the only way damage could be done is if one did not have the crankshaft locked and lossend the cam bolt then rotated the cams. Then at this point the cams wouldn't be in sync with the crank. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

The new tensioners I understood that they had the backing plate integrated. My question was that the little groove on the underside where the oil travels didn't look like it mated with the galley on the engine block. I was just uneasy and thought what if the oil doesn't travel inside the tensioner and the oil pressure doesn't tension the tensioner.

Originally Posted by M. Stojanovic
I guess you mean can you unlock the cams and rotate them, while the crankshaft is locked. If this is what you mean, then the answer is no. With the crankshaft locked, you can only rotate the cams a small amount around the position of their flats up (the position where the flats are when locked). If you rotate the cams too much away from the flats up, you risk bending the valves as some will come in contact with the pistons.
That is what I meant. I just didn't mean to rotate the cams much to smack valves. Just a bit or rotation or even removing the cams. As long as I replace the cams and have them line up with the locking plate everything should be fine correct?
 
  #6  
Old 02-11-2018, 09:34 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BobRoy
When the crankshaft locking tool is installed the timing is set at 45° ATDC. With the pistons in this position the valves will not come in contact with the pistons if the cams are rotated.
Thanks, that's very good to know as I am just about to start installation of the camshafts on my Super V8 engine. I have the manual you attached but (obviously) did not read it in detail.
 
  #7  
Old 02-11-2018, 09:55 AM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 11,891
Received 7,878 Likes on 4,762 Posts
Default

Once the CRANK is locked @ 45 degrees ATDC you can remove the cams, remove the heads etc. (that is how you disassemble the engine)

The cams can be reinstalled and locked into place. The sprockets are then tightened and the engine is now timed properly.

bob
 
The following 2 users liked this post by motorcarman:
Don B (02-11-2018), Highhorse (02-11-2018)
  #8  
Old 02-11-2018, 11:51 AM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by motorcarman
Once the CRANK is locked @ 45 degrees ATDC you can remove the cams, remove the heads etc. (that is how you disassemble the engine)

The cams can be reinstalled and locked into place. The sprockets are then tightened and the engine is now timed properly.

bob
Thanks bob! That's exactly what I wanted to know.

Does anyone here know if the sprocket to cam bolt is a stretch/angle bolt? On JTIS it mentioned to torque the bolt down to X amount and 90 degrees. Or is this not true in which case I can go ahead and reuse the bolt?
 

Last edited by PORNO; 02-11-2018 at 11:54 AM.
  #9  
Old 02-11-2018, 12:24 PM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 11,891
Received 7,878 Likes on 4,762 Posts
Default

I have uploaded HUNDREDS of TSBs to this site and Gus has them on his site as well.
These bulletins have info on most problems and solutions Jaguar has encountered.
Revisions to processes are often addressed in the TSBs.

bob
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
303-28 cam sprocket tool.pdf (57.4 KB, 77 views)
File Type: pdf
303-32 VVT bolt.pdf (110.4 KB, 71 views)
The following 2 users liked this post by motorcarman:
Don B (02-11-2018), PORNO (02-12-2018)
  #10  
Old 02-12-2018, 02:49 AM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by motorcarman
I have uploaded HUNDREDS of TSBs to this site and Gus has them on his site as well.
These bulletins have info on most problems and solutions Jaguar has encountered.
Revisions to processes are often addressed in the TSBs.

bob
Bob, I had already seen those TSB's and all the other TSB's on the main thread and nothing mentioned anything about an angular stretch bolt nor did anyone mention it on any of the hundreds and hundreds of threads. Jtis is throwing me off because it calls for the exhaust sprocket bolt to be tightened to 115-125nm then says

"carry out the intake camshaft retaining bolt tightening sequence.Tighten to 40 Nm + 90°."

I am not sure if by it saying carry out tightening sequence, it means to carry out the same torque as the exhaust sprocket bolt, then torque it again to 40nm PLUS 90 degrees. indicating its an angular bolt. Correct me if I'm wrong and I apologize for all the annoying questions. I guess I just suck at yielding good search results
Tensioner lockdown question-3geidk5.jpg
 
Attached Thumbnails Tensioner lockdown question-jtis-torque-angle-bolt.jpg  
  #11  
Old 02-12-2018, 06:51 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PORNO
Jtis is throwing me off because it calls for the exhaust sprocket bolt to be tightened to 115-125nm then says

"carry out the intake camshaft retaining bolt tightening sequence.Tighten to 40 Nm + 90°."
The Workshop Manual specifies 115-125 NM for both, exhaust and intake, camshafts on supercharged engines. It specifies the same torques in the case of NA engines (with VVT) but the torque of the bolt through the VVT was later amended by the TSB. There is no reason to have different tightening torque and procedure between exhaust and intake camshafts on supercharged engines as the bolts are identical (the same length). Probably an error in the JTIS (copy and paste from the "Vehicles without supercharger" and forgot to amend the "Tighten to..."
 
  #12  
Old 02-12-2018, 07:07 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Just for comparison, M12 x 1.5 Grade 12.9 bolts (like the bolts for the camshaft sprockets) are / can be, according to the general fastener torque tables, tightened to 147 NM. As it is probably unnecessary to go to this full torque in the case of clamping the sprockets to the camshafts, Jaguar specified somewhat lower torque. Both torques, 147 and the Jag's 115-125 NM, are certainly not cases of torque to yield (stretch).
 
  #13  
Old 02-12-2018, 07:16 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

I just realised that the JTIS is also wrong when specifying 40NM plus 90 deg. for VVT bolt. It should be 40 NM and then to 85-90 NM, as per TSB.
 
  #14  
Old 02-12-2018, 09:04 AM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M. Stojanovic
Just for comparison, M12 x 1.5 Grade 12.9 bolts (like the bolts for the camshaft sprockets) are / can be, according to the general fastener torque tables, tightened to 147 NM. As it is probably unnecessary to go to this full torque in the case of clamping the sprockets to the camshafts, Jaguar specified somewhat lower torque. Both torques, 147 and the Jag's 115-125 NM, are certainly not cases of torque to yield (stretch).
Thank you. Yea I was thinking I couldn't be crazy. I was getting the hint of an error. Anyways, once I saw the 90 degrees I was beating myself up because I though that was implying it was a torque to yield and had already left the dealer from ordering a few bolts and wishing I had ordered the sprocket bolts. Thank for removing that trouble for me. So generally when torque to yield is called for, would it be clearly mentioned?
 
  #15  
Old 02-12-2018, 09:55 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,636
Received 843 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PORNO
So generally when torque to yield is called for, would it be clearly mentioned?
Not necessarily but torque to yield always goes torque to xx NM plus yy degrees.

Workshop (factory) manuals almost always have errors and some can be catastrophic if followed. A couple of examples:

- XJ8 Workshop Manual gives, in the table of engine torques, the torque for the head bolts as just 35 NM (no mention of +90 +90 deg.)

- Ferrari 348 Workshop Manual states 0.8 NM for the M6 bolts on camshaft caps (a little more than finger tight).
 
The following users liked this post:
PORNO (03-19-2018)
  #16  
Old 03-18-2018, 09:28 AM
hispeed42's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 354
Received 127 Likes on 85 Posts
Default Interesting Discussion

Are there different head designs used on the sprocket bolts? (ie, Torx, Hex, Ribe.) I ask as I used the 10mm ball head on my AJ27 engine and it didn't work too well. I got the bolt out after modifying a 12mm Ribe bit to fit properly, but the bolt head is too mangled to reuse. (It looks like an ARP 256-1001 might be a good replacement.) My first XJR was a '98 and it seems that the bolt heads on that engine were more of a torx style head. I say 'seems' as it was 15 years ago when I took a look at the timing gear to see if the upgrades had been done, which they were.


Mark
XJR-100
 
  #17  
Old 03-19-2018, 02:43 PM
PORNO's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: California
Posts: 80
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hispeed42
Are there different head designs used on the sprocket bolts? (ie, Torx, Hex, Ribe.) I ask as I used the 10mm ball head on my AJ27 engine and it didn't work too well. I got the bolt out after modifying a 12mm Ribe bit to fit properly, but the bolt head is too mangled to reuse. (It looks like an ARP 256-1001 might be a good replacement.) My first XJR was a '98 and it seems that the bolt heads on that engine were more of a torx style head. I say 'seems' as it was 15 years ago when I took a look at the timing gear to see if the upgrades had been done, which they were.


Mark
XJR-100
I don't believe so. I am almost certain they are all the same as per jtis and jaguar classic parts. They're a 10mm hex. When I was loosening them I used a 10mm hex bit but stop midway because I felt as if it was going to strip. I ended up using a impact torx bit t55 if I remember correctly. It felt so much better.
 
  #18  
Old 03-20-2018, 04:31 PM
hispeed42's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 354
Received 127 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply, PORNO. When I did a full chain job at 100k miles (73k ago) I got a 10mm hex and the 10mm ball head. Got the same results as you, but I wrapped some duct tape around the 10mm hex and was able to R&R all 4 bolts. There was a little damage to the bolt heads, but it all worked out. This time around, my diagnosis is the A-bank secondary tensioner. What caught my eye was slack on the tension side of the secondary chain. When I put the bar across the cams, the slack was still there, so I needed to do a little tighten up there requiring the bolt to be removed. Using the same technique as before (with the duct tape), I managed to really mangle the head on the cam bolt. Also, while perusing the Jag tool website, I came across tool number 303-1077A, Ribe Socket M12 x 1/2. The description of its use is "Removes the exhaust camshaft sprocket retaining bolt and nut" and is applicable to X200s and X350s. Well, that X200 would include 4.0L engines, so that all made sense. Instead of bying the Bosch tool for $37.99, I ordered a full set of Ribe bits for 24.99. When that arrived, the 12mm was too big and the 11mm too small. So, I put the 12mm on the drill press and got a cheap file to wear down some metal. I was able to get both the A and B bank bolts out, but I was very concerned about stripping out the remaining material in the bolt head. Summit Racing has a retail store near here, so I went and got the ARP bolts that I mentioned, and they work great. The only difference is that they have a larger flange with an 18mm 12point head. I can't get the 1/2-inch drive torque wrench on them, but I did find a short socket that allows the 3/8 drive torque wrench to get on there inside the timing cover. So, I used 20NM and 90 degrees of turn from the JTIS torque spec tables in the JTIS.


Here are some pics: the first one is the totally mangled bolt head from the A-bank; the second is the half-mangled head from B; the new bolt; short socket with 3/8 breaker bar.


Mark
XJR-100
 
Attached Thumbnails Tensioner lockdown question-20180320_134344.jpg   Tensioner lockdown question-20180320_134331.jpg   Tensioner lockdown question-dscn1613.jpg   Tensioner lockdown question-dscn1614.jpg  

Last edited by hispeed42; 03-20-2018 at 04:33 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rianbechtold
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
1
04-08-2010 05:43 PM
troverman
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
4
11-07-2008 07:05 AM
GordoCatCar
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
7
08-02-2008 01:02 PM
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
1
04-05-2008 08:54 PM
Mr T
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
10
02-19-2008 08:26 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Tensioner lockdown question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.