Open loop, close loop
I wanted to align the idle RPM in open loop and close loop mode. So I started to measure and the result (although not related to the original intent) is as follows, all measurements with an oscilloscope, engine warmed, running, LUCAS P, 16ECU, USA model, V12, 1988, two connectors, 4 pin (test) and 2 pin (switch) in boot:
O2 sensors disconected from wire to ECU:
A bank - 0.6V
B bank - 0.5V
Reading disconnected wire to ECU:
A bank - 4.8V
B bank - 4.9V
O2 sensors conected to ECU, reading from connectors in engine bay:
A bank - 3.3V
B bank - 1.5V
OPEN LOOP, 780 RPM
Output on the 4-pin connector, square waves, A + B bank 1.9 V (it is all right, as described in Book)
CLOSE LOOP, 880 RPM
Reading from 4-pin connector, GW (A bank) and GK (B bank) in boot
A bank - square waves, 1.9V, something is bad
B bank - 3,7V
Result :
A bank is running in close loop mode in "map" mode
B bank is running (perhaps) in close loop mode in "O2 sensor mode"
O2 sensors are new (2 month old), ECU is refubrished.
Where to start to find solution ? Thanks
O2 sensors disconected from wire to ECU:
A bank - 0.6V
B bank - 0.5V
Reading disconnected wire to ECU:
A bank - 4.8V
B bank - 4.9V
O2 sensors conected to ECU, reading from connectors in engine bay:
A bank - 3.3V
B bank - 1.5V
OPEN LOOP, 780 RPM
Output on the 4-pin connector, square waves, A + B bank 1.9 V (it is all right, as described in Book)
CLOSE LOOP, 880 RPM
Reading from 4-pin connector, GW (A bank) and GK (B bank) in boot
A bank - square waves, 1.9V, something is bad
B bank - 3,7V
Result :
A bank is running in close loop mode in "map" mode
B bank is running (perhaps) in close loop mode in "O2 sensor mode"
O2 sensors are new (2 month old), ECU is refubrished.
Where to start to find solution ? Thanks
Last edited by roman_mg; May 11, 2018 at 04:30 AM.
I made yesterday experience. I link A-bank lambda to B-bank wire to ECU and B-bank lambda to A-bank. Result :
Reading from 4-pin connector, GW (A bank) and GK (B bank) in boot
A bank lambda - 3,7V
B bank lambda - square waves, 1.9V
It seems, that wires for A-bank are all right and ECU too, and bad is lambda in A-bank. I will try change A-bank lambda and we will see
Reading from 4-pin connector, GW (A bank) and GK (B bank) in boot
A bank lambda - 3,7V
B bank lambda - square waves, 1.9V
It seems, that wires for A-bank are all right and ECU too, and bad is lambda in A-bank. I will try change A-bank lambda and we will see
You can not read O2 sensors reliably with a DVM unless the DVM has peak hold function, you really need to look at the waveform on a scope. This is essentially an AC voltage and measuring with a DVM on DC will give not work as the O2 sensor pulses too quickly, and measuring on AC you will read the RMS value of the average of what the O2 sensor is reading.
Rich will be 0.9v and lean will be 0.1v
If your DVM has peak/min hold use these functions with DVM set to DC to measure max and min voltage
Rich will be 0.9v and lean will be 0.1v
If your DVM has peak/min hold use these functions with DVM set to DC to measure max and min voltage
Last edited by warrjon; May 12, 2018 at 05:46 PM.
On a scope 1.9 and 3.7 volts high is not correct. Is there a dc offset.
What are the scope settings. You need to set it to dc coupling.
Low part of the square wave should sit at 0.1v and high 0.9v.
What are the scope settings. You need to set it to dc coupling.
Low part of the square wave should sit at 0.1v and high 0.9v.
Trending Topics
These values are not from O2 sensors, are from 4 pin test connector in boot (ECU output for testing). Today I will do measure direct on disconnected O2 sensors, I will write.
Yes, but not in close loop. 1.9V say, that ECU is in map mode (open loop), and O2 sensors are not reading. But I have in close loop A-bank 1.9V and B-bank 3.7V. That is bad.
I have a vague recollection that on some old ECUs a DC offset is added. That would be more obvious if a reading was taken with the sensor disconnected.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yurtesen
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
1
Sep 21, 2010 05:59 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)









