XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Quad Cam 48 valve V12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #1  
warrjon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default Quad Cam 48 valve V12

Just though I would post this for those of you who are interested

jaguar 48 valve quad cam v12 | eBay
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 02:19 PM
  #2  
Flint Ironstag's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 417
From: Houston, TX
Default

Nice... wonder what kind of power #s that would make?
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 02:49 PM
  #3  
Per's Avatar
Per
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 513
Likes: 70
From: Norway
Default

Looks like sombody has gone fair way down the AJ6 head on V12 block. The 2.9 litre head is basically a V12 head but my oh my there us a lot of work yo make that work. Has he tired of the project or concluded that it is beyond his capabilities?
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

very nice piece of engineering, but a lot more work to make it in a usable running form.

looks like a hydroplane setup, and who knows if ALL clearences are correct.

but for $4000 AU , you could not reproduce it again.

some pix were on another site, same engine with 12 TBs.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
M90power's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 70
From: WV
Default

from what ive read, theres a reason why Jag discontinued the DOHC V12. and that reason is that with a good cam, you can outperform those heads.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 07:53 PM
  #6  
warrjon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

Jag did not persue the quad cam heads because it moved the weight higher up which had an adverse effect on handling of the race car. They do make more outright power with the sacrifice of some low to midrange. Jaguar deemed it not worthwhile for the costs involved. There are still a couple of Jaguar built quad cams around I remember reading an article this year by a guy who bought one out of Germany.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 01:19 AM
  #7  
Per's Avatar
Per
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 513
Likes: 70
From: Norway
Default

There were several reasons: Flathead had better low down torque and midrange was perfectly good. Had they gone racing I guess they would have persevered with the 4 cam. In addition space was tight enough in the intended recipient, the XJ6 which was under way. To top it off the twin cam would have been more expensive to produce.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 02:12 AM
  #8  
warrjon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Per
There were several reasons: Flathead had better low down torque and midrange was perfectly good. Had they gone racing I guess they would have persevered with the 4 cam. In addition space was tight enough in the intended recipient, the XJ6 which was under way. To top it off the twin cam would have been more expensive to produce.
The quad cam was developed for the le Mans sports car racers not the XJS specifically the XJ13 and is a completely different beast than the AJ6 headed one in the post.

Here is a link to some info, this guy has rebuilt one of the original Jaguar prototypes

Jaguar XJ13 | Building the Legend
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 03:40 AM
  #9  
Per's Avatar
Per
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 513
Likes: 70
From: Norway
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
The quad cam was developed for the le Mans sports car racers not the XJS specifically the XJ13 and is a completely different beast than the AJ6 headed one in the post.

Here is a link to some info, this guy has rebuilt one of the original Jaguar prototypes

Jaguar XJ13 | Building the Legend
True, the XJ13 has the first iteration which was also tested in a Mk 10 for road engone evaluation. Those engines had what is basically a XK head configuration i.e. With hemispherical combustion. chamber.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1100me
XJS ( X27 )
46
Jul 24, 2023 06:10 PM
kossevv
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
12
Feb 21, 2021 12:49 PM
JWheeler
XJS ( X27 )
13
Nov 22, 2019 08:28 AM
Dickie_L_J_O
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
8
Sep 13, 2015 07:44 AM
jaggermang
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
9
Sep 8, 2015 07:07 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.