XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Too replace or not too replace - Ignition Parts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 03:29 PM
  #1  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default Too replace or not too replace - Ignition Parts

Should these be replaced? I think they are low mileage. 5k or so. Im not sure how to detect wear on these.





 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 03:41 PM
  #2  
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 11,712
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

I don't see anything wrong with 'em. Throw 'em back on the car IMHO

Cheers
DD
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 04:15 PM
  #3  
Brake buster's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 821
Likes: 502
From: Gloucester UK
Default

yup

nothing wrong with them...


BB
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 04:31 PM
  #4  
Safari's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 757
Likes: 315
From: Denver, CO
Default

Agreed. Plenty of miles left in those parts.

Mark
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 04:55 PM
  #5  
kurtomatic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 216
Likes: 27
From: Dallas, TX USA
Default

My experience with the AJ6 is the cap and rotor tend to binary failures, and I've been stranded that way before.

So put 'em back on, then go ahead and keep replacements handy as insurance.

**whoops: I see you're running a v12 (faked out by the 6 cylinder cap, hahaha), but the same principle applies.
 

Last edited by kurtomatic; Sep 29, 2015 at 05:03 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 05:14 PM
  #6  
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 981
From: California
Default

Do the Marelli Fix Modification to the distributor, fill the rotor mount hole with silicone and you look good to go.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

YOU DO NOT need to modify the Marelli system. Porsche and Ferrari all used the same system, in fact the dual plug Porsche Dissy cap look almost identical to the V12 Jag, and none of these guys had fires.

All that is needed is to maintain the ignition system. What causes the fires in the Cats is bad spark plugs, usually in the front 4 cylinders.

That is not a genuine Marelli cap but appears to be in good condition
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 08:16 PM
  #8  
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 981
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
YOU DO NOT need to modify the Marelli system.

No you don't NEED to modify it. However, what is the downside of doing it?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 08:54 PM
  #9  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
YOU DO NOT need to modify the Marelli system. Porsche and Ferrari all used the same system, in fact the dual plug Porsche Dissy cap look almost identical to the V12 Jag, and none of these guys had fires.

All that is needed is to maintain the ignition system. What causes the fires in the Cats is bad spark plugs, usually in the front 4 cylinders.

That is not a genuine Marelli cap but appears to be in good condition
Do the porsche and ferrari systems have the same distributor shaft? maybe its shorter and doesnt arc? or maybe those cars just have easy access to the spark plugs and thats that?

I already have the silicone so I might as well put it in there. I was going to cut the shaft as well but maybe its not necessary?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 09:37 PM
  #10  
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 981
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
Porsche and Ferrari all used the same system, in fact the dual plug Porsche Dissy cap look almost identical to the V12 Jag, and none of these guys had fires.
Thinking about this, I seem to recall that there were quite a few examples of Marelli caused fires in Ferrari V-8s where they ran as two 4 cylinder units, and perhaps V-12s as well.

The Porsche dual plug, isn't going to suffer the same kind of failure because you are still going to get combustion, just not maximum efficiency combustion.

Additionally, the Ferrari is just a poor comparison. The risk of Marelli fire is from driving a XJS beyond the limits of proper maintenance. The number of XJS's that were driven well beyond proper maintenance standards, versus the number of Ferraris done so is a huge ratio.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2015 | 11:29 PM
  #11  
TheWarlock's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 366
Likes: 78
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
in fact the dual plug Porsche Dissy cap look almost identical to the V12 Jag, and none of these guys had fires
Not sure which model you are referring to, but the 993 distributor is actually a side by side unit with a belt drive. I understand both sides of the marelli discussion, and will stay out of it

 

Last edited by TheWarlock; Sep 29, 2015 at 11:33 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2015 | 12:35 AM
  #12  
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

The way I see it is why do modifications that are not needed, spend the time and maintain the system correctly and the car will not burn

This is Porsch MArelli
 
Attached Thumbnails Too replace or not too replace - Ignition Parts-porsche_911_distributor_twin_plug_ignition_27mm_cw_1__3.jpg  

Last edited by warrjon; Sep 30, 2015 at 01:47 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 01:37 AM
  #13  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

That porsche rotor is a completely different design. Those are points.

I used the silicone, though I did not cut down the shaft. It may have been a good idea to do so. Hopefully I do not run into issues. Though, it apears everyone who has used any silicone at all has not run into a fire yet. Whether that is becuaes they used the silicone or because they are more on top of the maintenance from that point on will not be known. I will definitely swap out the plugs and wires along with the cap and rotor every 20k.
 

Last edited by hoodun; Oct 1, 2015 at 01:47 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 07:12 PM
  #14  
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

Anyone looking for a replacement this seems like a good price

Ferrari 400 - Jaguar V12 Distributor cap and rotor JLM 1909 1911
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 07:33 PM
  #15  
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 981
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
Anyone looking for a replacement this seems like a good price

Ferrari 400 - Jaguar V12 Distributor cap and rotor JLM 1909 1911
SNG Barratt has a good quality replacement cap they have manufactured in the UK available at very reasonable price.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 07:46 PM
  #16  
JagCad's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,796
Likes: 2,403
From: Walnut Creek, California
Default

Hoodun:


From a generic point of view, that distributor cap and rotor look to be in fine shape. The button is clean and undamaged. No signs of excessive arcing on each tower or on the rotor.


Agree, slap 'em on.


I've read of the silicon as added insulation. I've my doubts as to it's effectiveness.


But, a whole lot of necessary arcing going on in a somewhat limited space.


Carl
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrentGardner
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
29
Dec 16, 2024 12:13 AM
X_Type_South_Africa
X-Type ( X400 )
6
Dec 9, 2015 05:37 PM
Mac Allan
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
16
Oct 12, 2015 11:59 AM
AlbBolivar
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
2
Sep 1, 2015 04:34 PM
casepie
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
Aug 30, 2015 09:49 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.