4.2 Throttle body VS 5.0 Throttle Body

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 2, 2022 | 02:13 AM

#21

Privilegedjaguar

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: May 2014

Posts: 67

Likes: 14

From: Los Angeles

Don't forget Steve I bored the sleeve also to fit 89mm Throttle Body. I learned if you bore throttle body and not the opening its kind of a waste. I had the sleeve bored out and reconstructed to get the benifits of the bigger throttle body.

Did you bore your sleeve Steve?

Dec 2, 2022 | 05:39 PM

#22

steve_k_xk

Veteran Member

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 3,005

Likes: 1,675

From: Sydney, Australia

Right so you bored the elbow going from throttle to inlet manifold to suit the larger throttle.

Also what size is the opening on the inlet manifold and did that require match porting as well ?

Will be good to see the amount of airflow you have compared to mine with these mods

Last edited by steve_k_xk; Dec 2, 2022 at 05:51 PM.

Dec 4, 2022 | 10:30 PM

#23

steve_k_xk

Veteran Member

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 3,005

Likes: 1,675

From: Sydney, Australia

Priv How'd you get on any numbers to report yet

Dec 5, 2022 | 02:44 PM

#24

Privilegedjaguar

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: May 2014

Posts: 67

Likes: 14

From: Los Angeles

4" 101mm
The elbow opening to manifold.

Dec 5, 2022 | 02:46 PM

#25

Privilegedjaguar

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: May 2014

Posts: 67

Likes: 14

From: Los Angeles

How do I get my rpms that high standing still to measure? 😂 My reader doesn't store history?

Dec 5, 2022 | 03:03 PM

#26

AlexJag

Sponsor

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 1,344

Likes: 453

From: San Diego CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk

Priv have you got a scanner that reads g/s at your MAF to compare , my readings were the following-
Standard 75/76mm throttle body 258g/s @7400
Maxbore 81mm throttle body 252g/s @7400

Was thinking with the increased rpm the larger throttle would add more power, but across the entire rpm range it was down.

Steve if you had yours ported with larger butterfly installed most likely tb isn't opened all the way at WOT. That's what was happening to mine until readjusted opening values on the ECU. If you need help with this let me know. You can verify full opening with car off , ignition on , visually confirm full opening angle with throttle fully depressed.

Last edited by AlexJag; Dec 5, 2022 at 03:07 PM.

Dec 5, 2022 | 10:17 PM

#27

steve_k_xk

Veteran Member

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 3,005

Likes: 1,675

From: Sydney, Australia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Privilegedjaguar

How do I get my rpms that high standing still to measure? 😂 My reader doesn't store history?

Lol your going to have to do it on the fly not stationary going to be interesting to compare figured

Dec 6, 2022 | 02:02 PM

#28

AlexJag

Sponsor

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 1,344

Likes: 453

From: San Diego CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk

Lol your going to have to do it on the fly not stationary going to be interesting to compare figured

you might want to ask if he has original MAF first .....

Last edited by AlexJag; Dec 6, 2022 at 02:04 PM.

Dec 6, 2022 | 03:02 PM

#29

steve_k_xk

Veteran Member

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 3,005

Likes: 1,675

From: Sydney, Australia

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexJag

you might want to ask if he has original MAF first .....

??
Did you guys change it

Dec 7, 2022 | 12:12 PM

#30

AlexJag

Sponsor

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 1,344

Likes: 453

From: San Diego CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk

??
Did you guys change it

I didn't work on his car...

__________________

2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp