XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Difference between 3.5 and 4.2 XK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2014 | 04:57 AM
  #1  
xtLSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Geneva
Default Difference between 3.5 and 4.2 XK?

Hello Guys,

I just registered, live in Geneva and want to buy an XK from 2006 up.
I am aiming for a 06-07-08 model. i have found two kind of engines the 3.5 with 258hp and the 4.2 with 300hp.

Can someone explain the difference between them?
Fuel economy?
Do you really notice the extra 50hp?
Why would they launch this less powerful version'

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2014 | 07:36 AM
  #2  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Never knew that engine was an option? Most be for other markets. I would bet there is a huge difference in performance. Even the 4.2 is not going to throw you into your seat. It has enough power for regular driving and is a joy as a daily. Very well put together and looks just so amazing.

I have shown the XK and few British car days, and when parked next Vantages, most people thought the the XK was just better looking, FWIW.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2014 | 07:50 AM
  #3  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,525
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Welcome to the forum, when you get a moment stop by or new members area and introduce yourself.

The 3.5L XK was sold in European markets because of some tax issues, a 4.2L costs more to register because of engine size, so the 3.5L was sold in Germany, Netherlands, France, Switzerland, etc.

The X350 XJ also had the 3.5L available in certain markets.

Yes it's down on power compared to the 4.2L, not sure if there is any real difference in economy to be seen. In the XJ it was basically the same performance as the old 3.0L V6, but with V8 burble and slightly better economy.
 

Last edited by Cambo; Sep 10, 2014 at 07:52 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2014 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
britannia's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 665
Likes: 110
From: Federal Way,WA
Default

They are both V8's! but with your mountains I would think you would be happier with the extra HP of the 4.2L..............however, either will be great vehicles and it is the best Jag. model I've ever owned (had 13 since 1959!).

Happy hunting, get one soon! Adrian
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #5  
xtLSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Geneva
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo351
Welcome to the forum, when you get a moment stop by or new members area and introduce yourself.

The 3.5L XK was sold in European markets because of some tax issues, a 4.2L costs more to register because of engine size, so the 3.5L was sold in Germany, Netherlands, France, Switzerland, etc.

The X350 XJ also had the 3.5L available in certain markets.

Yes it's down on power compared to the 4.2L, not sure if there is any real difference in economy to be seen. In the XJ it was basically the same performance as the old 3.0L V6, but with V8 burble and slightly better economy.

You are right, I just completed my presentation
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/n...2/#post1055524

 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 09:11 AM
  #6  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Prices in CH don't seem far off from US prices.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xjrjag
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
23
Oct 24, 2024 03:09 PM
Quantico
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
18
Oct 13, 2015 10:34 PM
simongulliver
XK / XKR ( X150 )
35
Sep 16, 2015 03:40 AM
Gerard Radimaker
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
8
Sep 13, 2015 10:33 AM
carcycle
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
5
Sep 7, 2015 10:22 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.