XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Xkr-s gt review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-30-2013, 11:18 PM
GhostriderXKR08's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 806
Received 109 Likes on 67 Posts
Default Xkr-s gt review

Chris Harris test drives the XKR-S GT:

 
The following 5 users liked this post by GhostriderXKR08:
axr6 (10-31-2013), Bruce H. (10-30-2013), DGL (10-31-2013), MaximA (11-05-2013), Ngarara (11-10-2013)
  #2  
Old 10-30-2013, 11:57 PM
Octurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern california
Posts: 375
Received 63 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting. I really enjoy chris Harris' reviews.
 
  #3  
Old 10-31-2013, 07:34 AM
TheMCP's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 150
Received 38 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Chris Harris is great... thanks for putting that up here. Is it ever just dry in England? Nice catch at 6:10 holy cow.
 
  #4  
Old 10-31-2013, 09:50 AM
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,367
Received 594 Likes on 422 Posts
Default

Looks like loads of fun for an experienced driver. It was, not surprisingly, skating in the wet but, more surprisingly it was nearly getting away from the driver at 6:10+ in the dry too. 7:40 at the Ring is rather decent for this big, heavy car. I could definitely live with one...

thanks for posting,

Albert
 
  #5  
Old 10-31-2013, 09:58 AM
Octurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern california
Posts: 375
Received 63 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

7:40 is a pretty good time for a gt car. The Xkr-s does 7:50, so 10 sec faster is quite a bit, but the GT has R compound tires, which may account for 3-5 sec (just guessing there). My old 996 turbo did 7:56, so it shows how far technology has come (and hp) since 2001.
 
  #6  
Old 10-31-2013, 03:12 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Octurbo
7:40 is a pretty good time for a gt car. The Xkr-s does 7:50, so 10 sec faster is quite a bit, but the GT has R compound tires, which may account for 3-5 sec (just guessing there). My old 996 turbo did 7:56, so it shows how far technology has come (and hp) since 2001.
It was a pretty spectacular time just 5 years ago when the then new GT-R ran a 7:38 (probably with street tires), IIRC.
 
  #7  
Old 10-31-2013, 06:05 PM
hawaii's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Maui
Posts: 474
Received 98 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

You'll be glad to know Chris Harris personal car is a maroon XKR coupe. One of his videos shows that he hates to wash his cars.
I like him too!
 
  #8  
Old 10-31-2013, 06:16 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hawaii
You'll be glad to know Chris Harris personal car is a maroon XKR coupe. One of his videos shows that he hates to wash his cars.
I like him too!
How do you know that? He said in one video he had a 911 GT3 (991), but naturally he might own more than one car. For a while it was a Ferrari 599, but he found it waay too expensive to maintain.
 
  #9  
Old 11-01-2013, 02:20 AM
hawaii's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Maui
Posts: 474
Received 98 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Here ya go Bruce!
Enjoy
 
  #10  
Old 11-01-2013, 11:43 AM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

^ thanks!
 
  #11  
Old 11-01-2013, 12:20 PM
Stormdk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 214
Received 50 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Thx for posting...

He is by fare, in my humble oponion, the best current car reviewer... love watching his vids... looks a bit like Freddy Mercury though...
 
  #12  
Old 11-01-2013, 02:35 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Oz
Posts: 3,907
Received 1,278 Likes on 880 Posts
Default

Yes, the review was good. This was the review that sold me on the XKR, though (if I needed any selling)
 
  #13  
Old 11-01-2013, 10:27 PM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,428
Received 346 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Agreed!!!!! Love the 175!!
 
  #14  
Old 11-02-2013, 08:04 AM
AVMiii's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jackson NJ 08527
Posts: 142
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
 
  #15  
Old 11-02-2013, 03:37 PM
R_Rated's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 134 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

I like seeing the child seat in the back of Chris Harrison's xkr. Lol
 
  #16  
Old 11-04-2013, 05:59 PM
Ngarara's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,425
Received 1,123 Likes on 795 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AVMIII
The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
The 175 is basically an XKR Sports Pack - body kit to improve aero stability, limiter increased to 174 MPH. The 75, which wasn't sold in the US, has most of the upgrades that later appeared in the R-S, but not quite the R-S HP ('only' 530). The R-S has a more in-yer-face body kit, which only increased downforce by 1%, and 20 more HP (550 PS). The S-GT takes it a step further - the guy that developed it described it to me as "slightly bonkers".
 

Last edited by Ngarara; 11-10-2013 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Correct HP difference
  #17  
Old 11-10-2013, 05:54 AM
xk.rs's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Yep, a nice review... the GT really is something else.
 
  #18  
Old 11-13-2013, 06:02 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Randy Pobst just tested one and said...

"My new favorite English car. A real track weapon. Power handling brakes looks exclusivity...wing"

Bruce
 
  #19  
Old 11-14-2013, 12:07 AM
Rw99's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 245
Received 45 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce H.
Randy Pobst just tested one and said...

"My new favorite English car. A real track weapon. Power handling brakes looks exclusivity...wing"

Bruce
Jeebus, Bruce, you beat me to it! I see you must also FB with Randy ;-)

Rich
 
  #20  
Old 11-14-2013, 06:22 AM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,428
Received 346 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Where can we read Randy's review?
 


Quick Reply: Xkr-s gt review



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.