XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Brainstorming: A back to basics X100?

  #41  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:49 PM
Ric in RVA's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 323
Received 97 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Does anyone do Singer Porsche like conversions on jags of any sort?


Singer Vehicle Design | Restored. Reimagined. Reborn
 
  #42  
Old 03-16-2018, 04:50 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ric in RVA
Does anyone do Singer Porsche like conversions on jags of any sort?


Singer Vehicle Design | Restored. Reimagined. Reborn


Hard to do on an X100 because they are all post OBDII.


A '90 Porsche you can do just about anything you want to it and Shhhhh... if you register it in Texas (or about 30 other states), it doesn't even have to pass emissions.


Maybe in 10 years people will be re-imagining X100's. Stranger things have happened.
 
  #43  
Old 03-17-2018, 02:22 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,647
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Someone like Tom Lenthal (there will be others). Will be hugely expensive.
 
  #44  
Old 03-17-2018, 02:33 AM
giandanielxk8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,396
Received 1,337 Likes on 722 Posts
Default WARNING This post is NSFW

Eagle does this for E-types. Their Eagle Speedsters and Low Drag GT are pure car ****.

https://www.eaglegb.com/






 

Last edited by giandanielxk8; 03-17-2018 at 02:36 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (03-20-2018)
  #45  
Old 03-17-2018, 05:57 AM
frankc's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Malvern, England
Posts: 1,286
Received 456 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

You can keep your E Types, dont like them. I know everyone seems to oooh and ahhhhhh about them but they were a radical design when they first came out and set Jaguar out on a new path that then developed into the X100 and the X150 etc.

The good old days of simplistic motors you can keep those too. Been there done that. Had enough of carbs and rotor arms to last me a life time. A real pain in the spark plug. Ok you could bash a starter motor with a hammer to un-stick it etc but that also came with ill fitting doors and a host of other problems.

To me the X100 XKR Convertible is the best of both worlds. I accept it has its faults, plenty of them, but once you get the car sorted you have a car that starts first time every time (touch wood etc). Rotten MPG by todays standards but a joy to drive, look at and work on.

If you hanker after simpler cars go and get my old MK1 Ford Escort, the ones with square headlights. It will only cost you around 30K in the UK. Then you will have a simple car etc. But I bet you end up putting in an electronic system to replace the rotor arm etc.

In conclusion if you want simple buy simple. Simple is not always best.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by frankc:
Scottsgreenjag (03-17-2018), simon3166 (03-20-2018)
  #46  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:31 AM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

So, I'm going to try to better clarify my intentions when I started the thread. What I had in mind when I started the thread is bringing the car back to basics. Sure there are reasons to be happy that cars today are loaded with technology. It has made cars safer for sure. But some things just make them bloated in my opinion. Do you really need an electric parking break? I know I don't. The safety features are for the most part welcome. But I can really do without gimmicks, gadgets and superfluous and unnecessary things. Especially in a sports car or weekend car or any vehicle that‘s it‘s not my groceries getter as they say.I tried finding out what were some of the equipment the X100 came with to see what I would get get rid of to bring the car back to basics. I'm going by a list of options and equipment I found online.


So here is a list of things I can do without:
  • Auto transmission
  • CATS
  • Power door locks. It‘s a two doors and narrow enough not to be a bother to reach across. Probably would save some weigh and just be one less thing to go wrong.
  • Emergency trunk release. If it‘s a cable fine. If it‘s electric, it can go. Don‘t need yet another electric gizmo to weigh it down and fail in the future.
  • Heated mirrors. Don‘t plan driving it on winters anyway.
  • Electric mirrors. They can go. You set it once and you are done, unless you share the car, which I won‘t. Don‘t need yet another electric motor to weigh it down and fail in the future.
  • Rear parking aid. Not sure what that consist of. If sensor, sensors plus camera or what. But if it can save weigh and make it less complex with ones less thing to go wrong in the future, I don‘t need it. It‘s not a bus. Easy enough to parallel park. I did several years with a much bigger car.
  • Power seats. They can go for sure! You set it once. And how hard is it to move a seat? I much prefer than waiting on slow electric seats.
  • Heated seats. Ditto! Gone!
  • The so called premium sound. Gone! Would just enhance the V8 sound instead. That‘s all the sound I need. A basic radio for news and traffic update is fine.
  • Power antenna. Gone!
  • Navigation. Gone! Stand alone navigation when I need, which would be rare with the X100. Just stick it to the windshield or dash. Stay out of the car when not in use.
Now these are things that I would possibly take off from the car, which is the idea of the thread. Not how I wish the car would have come from the factory, since it‘s pointless as it‘s too late. Otherwise power windows for example would be gone too. But to take them off and install something else is just not worth it. There are few things that fall in this category. Automatic climate control (simple AC would have been fine), electrically adjustable and telescopic steering column ( a mechanical adjustment is more than fine), ARTS, etc. But these are probably more headache than worth to take off. So I guess they can stay in.

Again this is not a wish list of how the cars should have been, but rather a list of what you would do with yours to bring it back to basics. For those saying they like all the tech, weight and complexity, fine. The thread is not for you then.

I understand people have different opinions.

This is just a start as I would have to research more about the cars and have more experience with them to make a deeper analysis. Hence why I asked current owners and those with more experience with the cars here.
 
  #47  
Old 03-19-2018, 01:24 PM
Redeye's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sunny North Devon, England
Posts: 280
Received 44 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Never vere from the true intent of the OP... You will get told off!
 
  #48  
Old 03-19-2018, 02:44 PM
giandanielxk8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,396
Received 1,337 Likes on 722 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redeye
Never vere from the true intent of the OP... You will get told off!
Specially when that OP is Jeagar.


Honestly, you can make it a project if you'd like, make a build thread and document it on the forum. I'm more than sure it would make for some interesting reading. On the other end of the spectrum, the complete opposite to what you want, there is some guy in Japan who is converting his XK8 into an EV. He is on this forum and you can find his thread pop up every once in a while.
 
  #49  
Old 03-19-2018, 05:43 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redeye
Never vere from the true intent of the OP... You will get told off!
Did it come across like I was telling people off? It wasn't the intention at all. Since people were posting things that didn't have much to do with the original topic, I thought maybe the reason was because they didn't understand my intentions for the topic. So I thought I would take the lead and post my own list, so people could better understand what I meant.
 
  #50  
Old 03-19-2018, 05:45 PM
frankc's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Malvern, England
Posts: 1,286
Received 456 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Here you go. Jaguars latest simple car.


 
The following users liked this post:
toaster (03-20-2018)
  #51  
Old 03-19-2018, 05:51 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by giandanielxk8
Specially when that OP is Jeagar.
Uh???

Originally Posted by giandanielxk8
Honestly, you can make it a project if you'd like, make a build thread and document it on the forum. I'm more than sure it would make for some interesting reading. On the other end of the spectrum, the complete opposite to what you want, there is some guy in Japan who is converting his XK8 into an EV. He is on this forum and you can find his thread pop up every once in a while.
I don't think the idea is this far yet, to become a project. The point was more to generate discussion.

Not discussion if it makes sense or not, or if more toys and more tech is better than back to basics or not, as that is redundant in this case. But more discussions of the type "oh, you want to get ARTS off but keep the aribags? Well that is not possible. You either keep both or lose both" and things like that. Not that what I just said is technically accurate. Just an example.

But the idea was to chat about the possibilities, gains etc of such an approach.
 
  #52  
Old 03-19-2018, 08:32 PM
baxtor's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,880
Received 1,122 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
Did it come across like I was telling people off? It wasn't the intention at all. Since people were posting things that didn't have much to do with the original topic, I thought maybe the reason was because they didn't understand my intentions for the topic. So I thought I would take the lead and post my own list, so people could better understand what I meant.
I think people thought they knew what the intention of the thread was but then you confused them by moving the goal posts.

Originally Posted by Jeagar
For example, if the electronic injection was a problem, and I'm not saying it is, I'm just trying to explain the spirit of the conversation, but if the electronic injection was a problem, we could just ditch that for a set of Weber carburetors for example. There are no rules.....

.....There are no real rules. It will be a personal thing. Some will ditch some things and hold to other things which others may ditch, and vice versa. It's all part of the fun. Let's just exchange ideas.
Several times it was stated there were no rules only to have rules imposed even to the point of taking to task those who mentioned fuel injection/ carburettors, the very example you used in the opening post and yes, it is exactly what you said.
I believe you can as the thread starter set the flavour of thread but you seem to be trying to micro manage rather than just allow the branches to grow.

Originally Posted by Jeagar
All this talk of carburetors and emissions but the point of the thread is being missed. For the record, I would not exchange the electronic injection for a carburetor in a X100. This is not what I said. As I mentioned in the opening post, this was just a random example to try to make it easier to understand what I was driving at. I tried giving a few examples along the way but most are missing the point and some started driving at the right point but then strayed.

I'm not sure if the point is being totally missed, ignored or just not interesting enough. But I did try to explain it in several different ways.



_
 
  #53  
Old 03-19-2018, 09:17 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

A lot of the things on the take off list don't really weigh that much. Seat heaters are maybe 1/2 a kilo, power locks aren't much, etc.

The XK8 isn't a sports car its a 2+2 GT car. Its designed to be comfortable for long, high speed trips. It uses big cushy foam/rubber to isolate the suspension from the the cars body and tall gears. Sports cars don't do this.

To make an XK8/XKR a proper sports car, that is no longer as comfortable for long, high speed trips, the rubber and foam in the suspension has to at least be replaced with something harder and the back seat removed. Modify the front shocks into coilovers (so the camber/tire wear is at least adjustable), replace the rear mufflers with under axle straight pipes for noise and flow, add brembos, 3.27 rear gears with a Quaife LSD.

If you think this is making a "race car" you can just buy an XK8 where all that stuff you don't want is broken/doesn't work. A tilt/telescope wheel goes "back to basics" on it own. Heated seat, power mirrors, Power seat, etc. might all go "back to basics" on their own, eventually, too. Then you get it experience the joys of motoring in a simpler era and it doesn't cost extra,
 
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (03-20-2018)
  #54  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:46 PM
XK8 Rebel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: SC
Posts: 124
Received 58 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I'll weigh in with a couple of thoughts. In the vein of going simpler, I could lose the leveling headlights and wouldn't miss them at all. Same with the back up sensors (which are on the fritz again!). Rarely use the heated seat feature and wouldn't miss that. If the electric seat adjustments were reliable I would be fine with them but since they really are not, manual would be fine for the added reliability. With all the nightmarish problems it gives, a manual convertible top would seem like a good idea. The rear fog lights on mine have never been used, (by me) lose them and their button. Don't have the CATS on mine and don't want it, more complexity with minimal additional capability. I like power windows but they are overly complex on this car with all the tricks they have to do and the door switches are also problem makers. And do we really need four different ways to get in to the trunk (key, external button, internal button and remote)? I could do without the power antenna if there was a good windshield mounted one but I will keep the nice sound system. A manually adjusted steering wheel and column would be adequate as well. I wish there was less rubber pluming under the hood (especially valley hoses) and that a lot of the hoses could be replaced with metal tubing and just use rubber for short connections, not long runs. A simple package shelf instead of the rear seats would be an improvement but doesn't really simplify anything unless you count getting rid of seat belts. The auto headlight and dimming mirror features are both overkill and I think overall reliability would be better with out them. The compass is just a toy and not really needed. The integral garage door features seems superfluous; does anyone still use them?

I would definitely want to keep the fuel injection and electronic ignition! I grew sick of piddling with carbs, and vacuum advance distributors long ago.

Make the ZF less complex and less electronic without all the adaptive nonsense. I know a lot of folks want to go with a manual tranny. No thanks! I love to drive them but in my experience most automatics last longer with less repairs than the more finicky manual clutches. Was always having to adjust or replace clutches, throw-out bearings and resurface flywheels. I do wish the ZF was a bit more robust and reliable. I have a Dodge with an automatic that has 250,000 miles and only had the transmission repaired (not rebuilt) once!

A couple of things would need to be added also. Put a filler tube and dipstick on the ZF along with an actual metal pan with a low point drain plug, for gods sake! And real working gauges for temp, oil pressure, etc. An external fuel pump with an easy to reach fuel filter would be a huge plus IMHO. And all the XK100 's should have come with the louvered hoods to promote cooling.

My 2 cents and worth what you paid!
 

Last edited by XK8 Rebel; 03-20-2018 at 12:03 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (03-20-2018)
  #55  
Old 03-20-2018, 03:17 AM
dibbit's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 1,204
Received 459 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

A much better idea would be to keep the weight of things like electric door mirrors and steering column adjust and offset them by getting the supercharged version of the car.

Honestly, the OP needs to stop dreaming and just go out and buy an XKR, then fix the things that go wrong, rather than worrying about what might go wrong.

Seriously, how much faster and more reliable will the car be without heated wing mirrors, lol?
 
  #56  
Old 03-20-2018, 08:21 AM
brianworld's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Midland, Michigan USA
Posts: 7
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Before the Brainstorm passes: Does anyone else fondly remember the 2000 F-Type Concept car?
https://jalopnik.com/this-is-the-jag...een-1773855349
 
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (03-20-2018)
  #57  
Old 03-20-2018, 12:38 PM
giandanielxk8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,396
Received 1,337 Likes on 722 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brianworld
Before the Brainstorm passes: Does anyone else fondly remember the 2000 F-Type Concept car?
https://jalopnik.com/this-is-the-jag...een-1773855349

I wish they had actually made that car.
 
  #58  
Old 03-20-2018, 01:34 PM
150FHC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North California
Posts: 413
Received 107 Likes on 81 Posts
Default Or this

Or the XK-180 that preceded it:

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/first-drives/reviews/a5944/jaguar-xk-180-drive-flashback/

I think I have a scale model of one or the other, around here, somewhere

Granville
 
  #59  
Old 03-20-2018, 02:59 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,647
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Anyone for the XK120 / XK150.
 
  #60  
Old 03-20-2018, 06:17 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ungn
A lot of the things on the take off list don't really weigh that much. Seat heaters are maybe 1/2 a kilo, power locks aren't much, etc.

The XK8 isn't a sports car its a 2+2 GT car. Its designed to be comfortable for long, high speed trips. It uses big cushy foam/rubber to isolate the suspension from the the cars body and tall gears. Sports cars don't do this.

To make an XK8/XKR a proper sports car, that is no longer as comfortable for long, high speed trips, the rubber and foam in the suspension has to at least be replaced with something harder and the back seat removed. Modify the front shocks into coilovers (so the camber/tire wear is at least adjustable), replace the rear mufflers with under axle straight pipes for noise and flow, add brembos, 3.27 rear gears with a Quaife LSD.

If you think this is making a "race car" you can just buy an XK8 where all that stuff you don't want is broken/doesn't work. A tilt/telescope wheel goes "back to basics" on it own. Heated seat, power mirrors, Power seat, etc. might all go "back to basics" on their own, eventually, too. Then you get it experience the joys of motoring in a simpler era and it doesn't cost extra,
You are right. Many things on the list don't weigh a lot. But it's not only about the weight but also about making it simpler, with less things to go wrong. I have had electric mirrors and electric windows fail on me before and I must say, unless you want to DIY with a part you pulled out of a junk yard, the price of repairing it is almost not worth it. So since we are throwing things out anyway, why not? And as the racing motto goes, grams will eventually amount to kilos.

I'm all for the modifications you mention in your second paragraph, with the suspensions mods etc. I don't think this makes it a race car. What I meant by not wanting to make a race car is that with a race car you can ditch pretty much everything. You can leave just the steering wheel and a single seat in a bare interior without any lining, isolation or anything. This is what I meant I didn't want. I want to keep the leather, I like the dash the way it is etc. But I'm fine with the mods you suggested above. They don't make it a race car in my opinion.
About buying a XK8 where all that stuff I don't want is broken/doesn't work, well the broken stuff would still be there, bloating the car. So they would still need to be taken off.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Brainstorming: A back to basics X100?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.