XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

Hold onto your XKR!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 10:17 PM
  #1  
Blackhillsjag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 23
From: Keystone SD
Default Hold onto your XKR!

Just got back from Europe for the holidays, both in The Netherlands and the UK. I did not see one single XKR, I did see three XK8's, not one a convertible. On my return to the US I checked out ebay..as you do...hardly any late model XKR's(03+) on offer. Sure it's winter and perhaps the verts will re-emerge, but really X100 XKR's are looking increasingly rare. A couple of years ago I read in a British publication that the X-100 series (XK8-XKR) was perhaps..perhaps..perhaps the new E-type in our time....fingers crossed! Also when you look at the individual colour/spec options we are almost as exclusive as an Aston Martin DB7 from the same time period. Pretty good I'de say!
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
david i's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 136
Likes: 32
From: USA
Default

Think my signature says it well

-d
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 11:47 PM
  #3  
Sentinelist's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 896
Likes: 156
From: North Texas
Default

That's what I've always thought and considered- this is the 'classic E-Type' of my generation. It ages damn well.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 03:14 AM
  #4  
steveinfrance's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,278
Likes: 690
From: Limousin, France
Default

As I've said before -it's prettier than an E type
 
Attached Thumbnails Hold onto your XKR!-p6160002.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 04:35 AM
  #5  
Frog's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 173
From: France (UK expat)
Default

^agreed. A convertible E-Type in red looks nice, but the coupé version, especially the V12 2+2, looks awful, IMHO.

The XK8/R looks superb in any guise and that's why I have decided to keep mine, rather than 'upgrading' to an Aston Martin
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 09:02 AM
  #6  
stremsjg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 21
From: Hilton Head, SC
Default

I agree, when you have the E-Type and XKR side by side, you can really see how E-Type morphed into the XKR. The only real dimensional difference is the XKR is much wider than the narrow E-Type. I enjoy driving both, but vastly different in comfort. Both cars have those classic lines that never go away with time.
 
Attached Thumbnails Hold onto your XKR!-dsc04694a-2-.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 09:19 AM
  #7  
Paul Pavlik's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 434
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Well, i guess I'll just have to agree with all of the above!

 
Attached Thumbnails Hold onto your XKR!-myxkr09b.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 10:08 AM
  #8  
RCSign's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 202
From: Quad Cities IL
Default

As written by Paul
Well, i guess I'll just have to agree with all of the above!
Me too!
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 10:12 AM
  #9  
steveinfrance's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,278
Likes: 690
From: Limousin, France
Default


Dammit, Paul - that pic of your hardtop makes it look prettier than a rag top.
Did you photoshop it??
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #10  
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 571
From: Los Angeles
Default

From the get-go I was amazed at how inexpensive our cars were on the resale market considering the fact that not that many of them were even made. Especially towards the end of the run, there were only maybe 1000 or less XKR convertibles built per year. The styling of these vehicles never gets old and it seems to me that the more time passes the more appreciated these will be.

Doug
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
Frog's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 173
From: France (UK expat)
Default

Guys, I will give you a subtle hint as to why the XK8's looks appeal to us:



Paul, I am not suggesting your coupé looks any more like a 'marital aid' than mine, it's just that your photo was to hand
 
Attached Thumbnails Hold onto your XKR!-xkprofile.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 10:57 AM
  #12  
Sentinelist's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 896
Likes: 156
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by steveinfrance
As I've said before -it's prettier than an E type

Originally Posted by Frog
^agreed. A convertible E-Type in red looks nice, but the coupé version, especially the V12 2+2, looks awful, IMHO.

The XK8/R looks superb in any guise and that's why I have decided to keep mine, rather than 'upgrading' to an Aston Martin
Yes and yes! Spot on, same here. I never liked the E-Type coupe, just the ragtop. I still can't decide which XK100 I like better- the coupe or convertable. I may have to get both at these prices.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:27 AM
  #13  
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,076
Likes: 4,724
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

No question that the coupe has the best visual lines. But the ragtop has an advantage during convertible season (as long as the damn thing functions properly)....
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 12:33 PM
  #14  
xenophobe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 134
From: Mtn View, CA
Default

The coupe looks better than the vert with the top up. The vert with the top down is one of the best looking cars ever created, IMO.

I really love this car so much. Much more than any other vehicle except maybe my first car, just for nostalgia...

 
Attached Thumbnails Hold onto your XKR!-img7428g.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #15  
keestanis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 159
Likes: 47
From: nl
Default xk's

Next time around in NL check Autoscout24.... Currently 16 xk8 convertibles (from the beautiful years) 4 XKR convertibles and 90 xkr coupes on offer...

All at bargain prices considering the beauty you get. Germany even more value for money, as their tax regime is much milder on cars.

Just to let y' all know...

Take care
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 03:40 PM
  #16  
Paul Pavlik's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 434
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by steveinfrance

Dammit, Paul - that pic of your hardtop makes it look prettier than a rag top.
Did you photoshop it??
No, but I did install Mina Gallery Rear (only) Lowering Springs. This lowered the Rear 1 1/4 inches.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 03:49 PM
  #17  
Frog's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 173
From: France (UK expat)
Default

Originally Posted by xenophobe
The coupe looks better than the vert with the top up. The vert with the top down is one of the best looking cars ever created, IMO.
This.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 09:12 PM
  #18  
Sentinelist's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 896
Likes: 156
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by xenophobe
The coupe looks better than the vert with the top up. The vert with the top down is one of the best looking cars ever created, IMO.

I really love this car so much. Much more than any other vehicle except maybe my first car, just for nostalgia...

Also agreed. I've always thought this was one of the most beautiful cars ever made and have had a 1:18 scale model of my 'Kate' (though in a dark purple) on my bookshelf for the last decade+! The coupe screams 'Aston' to me though.

Man, I have to get a set of Sepangs...
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:09 PM
  #19  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,623
From: Los Angeles
Default

Over the years I have purchased a few cars that I felt were classically designed as well as represented great value (see my signature). I didn't think much about appreciation, I just didn't want them to depreciate much after I bought them. The solution to that problem is to not pay much. The astounding fact that I could buy a nearly perfect 2002 XKR example with 60,000 miles on it 3 years ago for about $15,000.00 was to me astonishing. Certainly it's a timeless (isn't that the perfect definition of classic?) design that oozes with sensuality, has plenty of performance, and can be driven everyday in comfort and style. Whether or not the first generation XK8/R cars achieve XKE status remains to be seen. But who cares? They look better now, perform better, are far more reliable, and provide spectacular value. Moreover, on a body style that is some 16 years old, I am frequently asked if it's a new car. Although I bought a convertible, I find myself looking at ads for coupes as well. They're gorgeous too (and you can take them to the track). I fear I'll be adding to my collection soon. Bottom line is that I bought my XKR because I thought of it as a classic the first time I saw it, and the fact that you could buy one for less than a comparably aged Toyota Camry was just too hard to resist. (And by the way I bought a 2002 Camry for my daughter's first car, and I did pay more than what I paid for the XKR)
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:40 PM
  #20  
Sentinelist's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 896
Likes: 156
From: North Texas
Default

Depreciation rocks. I've never spent more than $20k on a car, all of them premium marques.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.