Diesel variants - All models Visit here for discussions on diesel powerplants and the impressive torque / mpg figures achievable....

Diesel tuning boxes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2013 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
graham-r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
From: SW of London
Default Diesel tuning boxes

Hello

My first 'proper' post here....

I would be very interested in peoples experience with any diesel tuning boxes that fit between the ecu and sensors etc.

I plan to try one, perhaps Bluespark (any other suggestions ?) on my 2.0D X Type, but some feedback would be great.

Thanks

Graham
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2013 | 10:23 PM
  #2  
JimC64's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 47,291
Likes: 9,029
From: Glasgow, Scotland UK
Default

Hi there, just a few brief notes.

I have heard many experiences on the tuning boxes, both good and bad. I can't make a personal comment as I have'nt tried one myself, but have had 3 remaps, all of which I have been pleased with.

Have you checked out "Roverrons" diesel tuning boxes, synergy II I think it is?

These have been made specifically to suit the 2.0d and 2.2d found in both the Ford Mondeo and Jaguar X type.

Lots or rave reviews about them, perhaps worth checking out if you haven't already.

Best

Jim
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #3  
hebally's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 15
From: Scotland
Default

I have a Synergy 2a, it's good but not as good as a properly done remap as the tuning box only plays with the fuel supply.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2013 | 08:03 PM
  #4  
JimC64's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 47,291
Likes: 9,029
From: Glasgow, Scotland UK
Default

Originally Posted by hebally
I have a Synergy 2a, it's good but not as good as a properly done remap as the tuning box only plays with the fuel supply.
My sentiments exactly which is why I've always went down the route of a remap, but each to their own.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2013 | 04:06 AM
  #5  
graham-r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
From: SW of London
Default

Thanks for the info, was amused when I read this...

http://www.crdtechnology.com/select-...el-tuning-box/

The whole point of the article seems to be saying that remaps are the best and that tuning boxes are a bad thing. Then, at the end, they try and sell you their own tuning box.... As it has 5 selectable maps it must be fine.

If I do this at all then it is likely to be a tuning box, the Bluespark pro looks good (and it has 10 maps ! ), the Synergy II also a candidate + plus a German one (forget the name at the moment).

Still looking....

Graham


ps - then I looked at the price of the 'crdtechnology' tuning box. Ouch.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2013 | 07:31 PM
  #6  
JimC64's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 47,291
Likes: 9,029
From: Glasgow, Scotland UK
Default

Thanks Graham......

The Synergy II by Roverron is a very well tried n tested version as run by many many Mondeo / Jaguar owners......there's plenty of them on the UK site that will atest to this.

Whatever you go for, whatever you decide please be sure to come back and share your experience here.

Good luck
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 04:25 AM
  #7  
graham-r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
From: SW of London
Default

Right now it is a choice between the Bluespark Pro & Synergy II, they are both very interesting devices. Two other things I should to consider first - the insurance and sorting out the (probably) crud filled EGR/hoses first.

Anyone managed to convince their insurance co that the Synergy II 2e box is not a tuning mod (ie no BHP increase) ?

Thanks

G
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2014 | 10:42 AM
  #8  
graham-r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
From: SW of London
Default

Right, took a while but I finally fitted a Bluespark Pro at the weekend, and....

So far I am really impressed, it is set on the default (as it was delivered - economy 2 position), and the power is definitely increased, it is smoother and quieter, and the current onboard mpg readout is 51.5 (it touched 52.3) - way up from my usual 45 ish - this is with a fair bit of stop-start and general town driving as well as motorway cruising.

No smoke (as far as I can tell), no tickover clatter, and no MIL's;

I will fill up on Friday and see what the more accurate mpg is, last time I filled up the onboard mpg readout was under-reading by 2-3mpg ......

So far, so good.

Graham

Edit: The car is a 2.0D - for some reason the sig doesn't want to show itself.
 

Last edited by graham-r; May 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM.
Reply
Old May 6, 2014 | 06:31 PM
  #9  
JimC64's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 47,291
Likes: 9,029
From: Glasgow, Scotland UK
Default

Thanks Graham, good news

Be sure to report back.......
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JaguarLover101
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
48
Jun 12, 2023 10:28 AM
jluckcuck
F-Type ( X152 )
8
Nov 6, 2015 07:49 AM
pnwrs2000
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
6
Sep 30, 2015 01:56 PM
Malihide
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
11
Sep 29, 2015 03:21 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.