Known for being the first to introduce a truly potent ECU performance tune and pulley upgrade for the F-Types, both 3.0L and 5.0L, our packages have been producing consistent and reliable power since the summer of 2009 for Jaguar's 5.0L line up.

By reprogramming the ECU, not only were we able to increase the power of this potent SVR, we were also able to remove the speed limiter, hesitation/flat spots, and raise the RPM all while improving fuel economy by 10-15%. Stock figures for this special variant are 575hp / 516tq, after the installation of our performance package power jumps up to 638hp / 564tq! Tested on our Superflow Autodyn-880E awd linked dyno.

When it comes to the pulley upgrade, installation is a simple procedure. Thanks to our unique Jaguar pulley puller, designed specifically for the 5.0L, removal of the factory pulley can be completed in as little as 15 minutes with no damage to the pulley itself.

For owners who are not accessible to any of our dealers, you are in luck. We are offering a new package where you will be able to reprogram your vehicle through the OBD II port in the comfort of your own home. The process is simple, safe, and easy. Contact us directly for more information.

For more information on our Jaguar applications, please feel free to contact us with any questions.

 

Are the HP and torque values you reference rear wheels #s or are they converted to crank hp?

 

Hi RCCTurbos, yes the gains are crank power numbers not wheel.

 

Can you post the dyno chart or tables?

 

Great results! Would love to hear more from others who have gone this route.

 

Funnily enough I was reading a thread about ECU Tuning Group on a McLaren forum a few days back

Anyone get ECU Tuned via OBDIi Port? - McLaren Life

 

+1

not a hard request since the video shows the car actually on the dyno.

 

Here you go! Tested on our Superflow Autodyn-880E AWD-linked dyno located in our Ohio branch.

 

How come the HP and TQ curves are not intersecting where they should?

 

Good observation.

 

There was a similar observation made on that McLaren thread that I linked. They never did manage to get the tune working for the OP of that thread.

 

I know they are supposed to cross (have the same numerical value) at about 5252 rpm but the crossing point is also a function of the HP and TQ scales on the left (HP) and right(TQ)side of the Dyno plot. On this plot it looks like the scale is the same for both. So the crossing points do not make sense.

 

From a few reference points easily discernible on the chart, can we agree the "Tuned TQ" figure is 550 at 4000 RPM and 500 at 6000 RPM?

I think we know where this is going...

 

Please share your thoughts.

 

Horsepower is a function of torque and RPM. An engine which produces 550 lb. ft. of torque at 4000 RPM will produce 418.88 HP at 4000 RPM. Output of 500 lb. ft. of torque at 6000 RPM will equal 571.21 HP at 6000 RPM. These are mere facts which are not open for debate.

This is clearly not the data represented in the graph above, and the only reason I'm using those data points is because of the lines on the graph to reference.

 

Didn't mean to start a debate on our own thread lol. We apologize for the confusion as our marketing department scales the horsepower and torque curves to fit them neatly on the same graph. In trying to do so, has thrown this whole conversation in a different direction. Again, sorry for the error.

For those of you participating in this thread with no other intentions but to stir the pot...please feel free to address your concerns with us in person at one of our many locations across the U.S. Because if I remember correctly, your McLaren tuner of choice in the NY area is no longer business correct? Luckily for you, we still are

No need for keyboard warriors, there has got to be better things you could be doing with your time lol. Like we've mentioned before, we are not for everyone. We are just here to share our projects, no sales gimmicks or pushy methods. So if you're not interested, no problem. If you are? We here to help, it's really that simple. I guess that's why we're still around almost 3 decades later... #staytuned or #staybasic

 

Decided to share a quick video since we had to stop in the shop earlier this evening. The beauty of developing your own tools and owning your own dyno, is being able to access it at anytime...like on a Sunday lol.

This is for those who are interested in the actual whp reading, and that may have been confused by the marketing chart. Even at the suggested 15% drivetrain loss for RWD (this is a '17 AWD ), you can see our crank numbers from the previous chart and video are actually a tad more conservative.

And before Unhingd and ek993 have something smart to say (since they obviously love ETG so much), the cobra on the dyno is being tuned for an article that some good friends at a popular car magazine are writing. So love it or ignore it hahaha #becausetunerstune

Nevertheless, hopefully this helps! And as always, feel free to stop in and say hey!

 

If you've scaled the graph, doesn't that completely ruin the graph? Sounds like the curve no longer aligns with the scale, so we can't learn anything from the graph.

 

A touch late to the party my friend, please refer to our last post. Thanks!

 

You guys should just screenshot these rather than let the marketing department bring everything into question.