F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

F Type Goes After 25 to 54 Year Old Males

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 02:41 PM
  #1  
Tahoe Dave's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 389
Likes: 136
From: Genoa Nevada
Default F Type Goes After 25 to 54 Year Old Males

The link below is from an older, yet interesting article about Jaguar's marketing strategy. That said, I guess I am young at heart, as I passed 54 quite some time ago.

Jaguar sharpens F-Type push to reach men ages 25-54 - Luxury Daily - Multichannel
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 03:00 PM
  #2  
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 335
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Sounds about right to me...
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 05:50 PM
  #3  
AnD3rew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 953
Likes: 173
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Yep sounds about right
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 07:21 PM
  #4  
domino_z's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 656
Likes: 136
From: Australia
Default

Makes sense, I'm a 32 year old male and have never considered buying a jag till the f-type landed, and most likely wouldn't have if the engine/exhaust combo wasn't so ott
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 584
From: San Francisco
Default

That 25-54 group sounds way too optimistic (if it's for sales). I'm guessing it's more like 30-60. The cheapest F-Type is still about $70K once you throw in the floor mat options. Very few 25 year olds can afford $70K car. Now, it could be part of the bigger strategy to get them to eventually buy the XE, which I'm guessing is more like $30K ish.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 10:51 PM
  #6  
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 661
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by shift
Very few 25 year olds can afford $70K car. Now, it could be part of the bigger strategy to get them to eventually buy the XE, which I'm guessing is more like $30K ish.
I completely agree with you. That being said I am 25, so it's not wrong either.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 252
From: las vegas
Default

54 way back in the rearview mirror! Am I hurting Jaguar image? But we have a Maserati also,we're nuts!
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 08:12 AM
  #8  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

Targeting range is funky for all that was said already. Makes me laugh as I love my F-Type....and feel that I am ageless, happy, and defying the marketing geniuses logic, and will continue to do so :-)
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 09:31 AM
  #9  
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 335
From: Monterey, CA
Default

I'm 57 and Jaguar wasn't even on my radar until I saw the coupe,the convertible is just another open car to me, wouldn't even look twice...but the coupe stopped me dead in my tracks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:32 AM
  #10  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Originally Posted by buickfunnycar.com
I'm 57 and Jaguar wasn't even on my radar until I saw the coupe,the convertible is just another open car to me, wouldn't even look twice...but the coupe stopped me dead in my tracks.
Funny, I'm 62 and Jaguar wasn't even on my radar until I saw the convertible. The coupe is just another of the gazillion hardtop cars out there and convertibles are very uncommon these days, but I did look twice. The convertible stopped me dead in my tracks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:34 AM
  #11  
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 335
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Funny, I'm 62 and Jaguar wasn't even on my radar until I saw the convertible. The coupe is just another of the gazillion hardtop cars out there and convertibles are very uncommon these days, but I did look twice. The convertible stopped me dead in my tracks.
And that's why they make both...different strokes for different folks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 11:06 AM
  #12  
LoneAspen's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 67
Likes: 6
From: California
Default

I was the perfect demographic for the F-Type. 48 years old, and a 911 owner. The dealer even gave me more trade-in value for my 911 than the Porsche dealer was offering, which led me to believe they are really going after 911 drivers.

It worked
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
strippersteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 51
From: Douglasville GA
Default

I'm 34 and never even considered a Jaguar until I saw the F Type. It's stunning good looks shock me so much that from the time I saw one for the first time I had drove 250 miles across two states and bought myself one within 48 hours. They hit a homerun with the F Type.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 06:30 PM
  #14  
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 252
From: las vegas
Default

I think the Jag coupes are always better looking but I've always been a roadster guy and believe you don't really have the "sports' in sports car with the roof up!
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 02:03 AM
  #15  
Merlin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 603
Likes: 59
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by LoneAspen
I was the perfect demographic for the F-Type. 48 years old, and a 911 owner. The dealer even gave me more trade-in value for my 911 than the Porsche dealer was offering, which led me to believe they are really going after 911 drivers.

It worked
I'm in the same demographic as you. However, I was preparing to buy a Porsche when I stumbled across the F-Type while doing my research and comparisons against the 911 and Boxster GTS.

Until the F-Type came out I was not in the market for a Jag and if I hadn't seen some of the great reviews I'd have overlooked it completely. I'm glad I did, as my FTR is so much nicer looking inside and out, and close enough in performance to the 911 Turbo that I don't feel bad not getting one.
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 02:25 AM
  #16  
traumadoc's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 8
From: NC
Default Agreed

I was looking at the Porsche turbo as well. Had not even considered a Jag until a colleague who does open wheel racing recommended I look. Bought within 3 days. I have to have a convertible. When I get off work after a long shift, I put the top down and punch it! In my area Porsches are everywhere. I have one of the only F-types Annnnnnd I'm 54
 

Last edited by traumadoc; Jul 27, 2015 at 02:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 06:22 AM
  #17  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

I hear that 60 is the new 54!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 07:09 AM
  #18  
plmmd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 166
Likes: 25
From: New York
Default

just north of the demo- firm 911 advocate but had a patient who lost his 430 in Sandy and wound up in the f type- he talked me out of the c7 and into the f. I do not like the ragtop and as some may recall my first 2 weeks of coupe ownership put me in a convertible s which I didnt really like, if that was my test drive id be in a c7 right now
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 01:36 PM
  #19  
LynxFX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 969
Likes: 270
From: Las Vegas
Default

I'm another mid 30's guy that never would have purchased a Jag prior to the F-Type being revealed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 02:10 PM
  #20  
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 252
From: las vegas
Default

I hear 67 is the new 67!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.