F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

F-Type SVR Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 01:08 PM
  #1  
doctordeuce's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 22
From: Chicago, IL
Thumbs up F-Type SVR Discussion Thread

Just read a bit about it on autospies.com. Seems that it will share tech from the upcoming Project 7 development. Estimated to be around 600 HP with AWD.

http://autospies.com/news/SPIED-Jagu...he-Wild-83587/
 

Last edited by Cambo; Nov 26, 2014 at 02:22 PM. Reason: added link
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 08:59 PM
  #2  
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 661
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I would imagine that is RWD based on the hood vents. Appears to be all speculation right now.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 09:01 PM
  #3  
lunagry's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 278
Likes: 26
From: los angeles
Default

meh. Jaguar makes too big a deal out of adding 50 hp here and there.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 06:52 PM
  #4  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default F-type svr

Jaguar Land Rover plans to replace R-S badge with SVR on performance models, F-Type SVR confirmed
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 707
Likes: 102
From: San Anselmo
Default

ofc
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 09:35 PM
  #6  
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 910
Likes: 148
From: South east
Default

This thing will be great with AWD. Extra power will offset weight.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 10:28 PM
  #7  
XFactoR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 401
Likes: 71
From: New Jersey
Default

I hate the SVR moniker, and I hate that Jaguar is sharing the same nomenclature with Land Rover.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 06:39 AM
  #8  
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 910
Likes: 148
From: South east
Default

Originally Posted by XFactoR
I hate the SVR moniker, and I hate that Jaguar is sharing the same nomenclature with Land Rover.
I also prefer R-S however I think it is good they share same nomenclature. Range Rover should have taken R-S. Range Rover is a very coveted brand and the association helps Jaguar.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 584
From: San Francisco
Default

doesn't really matter...we're going to debadge it anyways
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:04 PM
  #10  
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 707
Likes: 102
From: San Anselmo
Default

Originally Posted by shift
doesn't really matter...we're going to debadge it anyways
LOL. YES!

They want SVR to sound like AMG

 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:10 PM
  #11  
TheStig's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 39
From: Tampa
Default

I don't care what it's called. If it is lighter and faster, sign me up !


MC
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:19 PM
  #12  
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 707
Likes: 102
From: San Anselmo
Default

Originally Posted by TheStig
I don't care what it's called. If it is lighter and faster, sign me up !


MC
Can they get more than 620HP out of the V8 though?

Lighter, ofc it can go lighter, just make as much carbon fibre as possible to reduce the weight, strip out some of the interior which lets be honest isn't the most lush.

Faster- just make it more aerodynamic, bigger wings and and lower.

What else?



 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:25 PM
  #13  
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 910
Likes: 148
From: South east
Default

I doubt it will be lighter but it may have better active aero like 991 Turbo S and more power. If they really want to take on Porsche they should also source a DCT from Getrag.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:26 PM
  #14  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

So, does SVR have any historical significance or is it just something the marketing dept. at JLR dreamed up? AMG has an historic meaning for Daimler-Benz as does the M for the BMW group.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 09:54 PM
  #15  
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 910
Likes: 148
From: South east
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
So, does SVR have any historical significance or is it just something the marketing dept. at JLR dreamed up? AMG has an historic meaning for Daimler-Benz as does the M for the BMW group.
No they are making history.

The R-S had no historical significance either. Only the R badge has historical significance at Jaguar.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 10:11 PM
  #16  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Originally Posted by StealthPilot
No they are making history.

The R-S had no historical significance either. Only the R badge has historical significance at Jaguar.
Thanks. At least the S, R, and RS designation was one that other companies, most notably Audi, used to distinguish between their regular models and "sport" and "racing sport." street models.

So in this new history JLR is writing, what do you suppose SVR would stand for--"Special Vehicle Racing?"
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 11:29 PM
  #17  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,519
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

You guys know that JLR was in a legal dispute with VW/Audi for the R/R-S branding, and lost?

Which is why Jag changed the "R" branding from a square to a round background.

And very likely why they are looking for a new performance brand.

R = too similar to VW R Line
R-S = too similar to Audi RS4/5/6

The VW/Audi logos were almost identical to the Jag ones. Jag lost...

The short term response was to change the background of the Jag R logo from square to round. Long term was, find a new brand. Hello SVR.











 

Last edited by Cambo; Jan 21, 2015 at 11:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2015 | 11:40 PM
  #18  
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 584
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo351
You guys know that JLR was in a legal dispute with VW/Audi for the R/R-S branding, and lost?

Which is why Jag changed the "R" branding from a square to a round background.

And very likely why they are looking for a new performance brand.

R = too similar to VW R Line
R-S = too similar to Audi RS4/5/6

The VW/Audi logos were almost identical to the Jag ones. Jag lost...

The short term response was to change the background of the Jag R logo from square to round. Long term was, find a new brand. Hello SVR.
Interesting. Like how Porsche lost to Peugeot for the 901 name and had to use 911.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 07:16 AM
  #19  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo351
You guys know that JLR was in a legal dispute with VW/Audi for the R/R-S branding, and lost?

Which is why Jag changed the "R" branding from a square to a round background.

And very likely why they are looking for a new performance brand.

R = too similar to VW R Line
R-S = too similar to Audi RS4/5/6

The VW/Audi logos were almost identical to the Jag ones. Jag lost...

The short term response was to change the background of the Jag R logo from square to round. Long term was, find a new brand. Hello SVR.











Thanks Cambo. As usual, you are the font of wisdom on Jaguar history and tech specs.

I did not know that since I'm new to the brand, having only been focused on E-Types as a kid.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 07:33 AM
  #20  
XFactoR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 401
Likes: 71
From: New Jersey
Default

I never knew that there was a lawsuit, but I'm not surprised. I always thought that the R logo was very similar to the Volkswagen one. I definitely like the R nomenclature better because it does have a history. It was simpler.

I bet you they would not of been sued if they did not use the "R-S" nomenclature. At that point, I think that they were pushing it. To be honest, they should've just kept it under the R name in the same way BMW uses M. After that, if they wanted boosted performance models they could've called them SVR spec or something like that.

That would've blended history, along with new ground.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.