F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F-Type SVR Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 04-28-2015, 08:44 PM
SteveSvr's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hamilton,Ontario
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.tflcar.com/2015/04/jaguar-f-type-svr-600-hp-beast/

Great read...
 
  #42  
Old 04-29-2015, 08:06 AM
Schwabe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grasonville, MD
Posts: 2,042
Received 442 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
No leg to stand on? Really, really? If it's JLR's tune, it's "certified" by them to be safe, so they have no choice but to stand behind it. If it's "Bob's Tuning," they don't. There are many parameters that can be altered to increase or decrease power output. Some might be safe, and some might not be.

Keep dreaming, and keep your fingers crossed. And BTW, you've given me a good reason above to not attend local car meets.



You are so wrong, just based on the tune Jaguar CANNOT refuse warranty, only if they can proof it caused the damage, Jaguar warranty is one thing but there are laws that trump their warranty.
 

Last edited by Norri; 04-29-2015 at 03:22 PM. Reason: Removed personal comments
  #43  
Old 04-29-2015, 08:21 AM
SteveSvr's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hamilton,Ontario
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any chance we could stay on Topic here....Please...F type SVR....not tuning

Thanx...Steve
 
  #44  
Old 04-29-2015, 08:25 AM
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,032
Received 640 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schwabe
You are so wrong, just based on the tune Jaguar CANNOT refuse warranty, only if they can proof it caused the damage, Jaguar warranty is one thing but there are laws that trump their warranty.
But is it really worth the likely court battle and getting a lawyer involved?
 
  #45  
Old 04-29-2015, 09:28 AM
ShaunPA's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stohlen
But is it really worth the likely court battle and getting a lawyer involved?
I agree with you, Stohlen. Like I said before, it's likely an uphill battle.

What Schwabe is talking about is the Magnusson Moss act. He's correct that Jaguar has to prove that the related modifications contributed to the failure in order to be able to deny warranty coverage ... a manufacturer can't say you modified the suspension and deny warranty coverage when the engine fails. However, it's not a stretch for a manufacturer to deny warranty of an engine failure when it comes to engine related mods or tuning.

The car was set up with x parameters from the factory... the car was running under y parameters at the time of failure causing xyz part to fail. If the car had been running by OEM factory spec this failure would not have happened.

Manufacturers/Dealers may extend good will and fix things anyway. I had this happen to a friend who with a turbo 350z and the motor blew a few thousand miles after the turbo install. A mod friendly dealer on your side will always help.

I've tuned many cars in the past and it was a given that the factory warranty was out the window if something were to break ... you have to pay to play as they say.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by ShaunPA:
Foosh (04-29-2015), Panthro (02-21-2016)
  #46  
Old 04-29-2015, 09:38 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,026 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Precisely!
 
  #47  
Old 04-29-2015, 10:03 AM
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Anselmo
Posts: 707
Received 102 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Its a good debate for us current owners but lets keep it objective and not personal. We are all adults here.

1. Upgrade to an SVR for 620HP, lowered and with carbon fibre wing. Lets say you get $80-$90k for your used F-Type, The SVR is going to be what, $130-140k? so that that's a new hit of $50k. (Second hand Ferrari 458's and others will be at that price in 1 year considering the new 488).

2. Bob's tuning (more like Hennesey or another ((whom will provide their own warranty))) you get arguably the same result for $4-5k (including lowering and tires). Ok, you void your warranty for the ECU remap but many, like me will be close to the end of our warranty by the time it comes out.

So the SVR is going to have to do something special for me to part with $45 or more. Like a V12 or something. In fact once it comes out I wonder if dealerships will offer a warranted tune of the V8. My dealership (BMCD) were very keen to do the lowering and some other mods for me and came down to a very competitive price.
 

Last edited by alexg; 04-29-2015 at 10:08 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by alexg:
Foosh (04-29-2015), WayneB (04-29-2015)
  #48  
Old 04-29-2015, 10:36 AM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

In line with the XKR-S GT, I'm guessing very modest power increase, if any. It'll be about body work, suspension, brakes, etc.
 
The following users liked this post:
alexg (04-29-2015)
  #49  
Old 04-29-2015, 03:34 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,746
Received 6,253 Likes on 5,453 Posts
Default

Guys can we stick to the tech discussion please and avoid personal attacks/comments?

Thankyou.
 
  #50  
Old 04-30-2015, 05:30 PM
SteveSvr's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hamilton,Ontario
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone thinking about ordering a SVR?....I am...All ready have a Downpayment on a new ACR...for the track...SVR would be my DD....
 
  #51  
Old 04-30-2015, 06:28 PM
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,420
Received 259 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteveSvr
Anyone thinking about ordering a SVR?....I am...All ready have a Downpayment on a new ACR...for the track...SVR would be my DD....
Really attached to my F type R at this point.. would have to see the SVR first to even consider.
Lawrence.
 
  #52  
Old 04-30-2015, 06:41 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

I seriously doubt the AJ133S in it's current form could leave the factory with >600HP, so i'm hoping that means an updated engine. Fingers crossed!
 
  #53  
Old 06-30-2015, 12:39 PM
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 996
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
The following users liked this post:
shift (06-30-2015)
  #54  
Old 06-30-2015, 12:45 PM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

Makes sense, more power, need more traction
 
  #55  
Old 06-30-2015, 02:21 PM
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 996
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

I'm wondering how they will extract that extra power.
 
  #56  
Old 06-30-2015, 02:48 PM
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 1,498
Received 177 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Hmmm...

Power is top speed. Torque is how quickly you get there.

Traction is unlikely to be an issue if all they've done is up the top speed.
 
  #57  
Old 06-30-2015, 02:49 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,026 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
I'm wondering how they will extract that extra power.
More than likely nothing more than a tune. The V6 and V8 are essentially the same engine design. The 380HP version of the V6 is already making 126.7HP per liter, and a 600HP version of the V8 would only be making 120HP per liter.

Tech people on this forum have been saying fairly routinely that the V8 had room to grow, but the V6 was probably close to maxed out.
 
  #58  
Old 06-30-2015, 03:13 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,932
Received 4,637 Likes on 3,359 Posts
Default

BMW was able to wring 1500 horses out of a 1.5 litre inline 4 engine adapted from a BMW2002 block back in the early '80s for Formula 1 racing. I'm certain with just a bit more boost and some tuning, that Jag can easily get another 50 horses and 30-40 lb-ft (low end acceleration) out of the 5.0, much like Eurocharged has already accomplished.
 
  #59  
Old 06-30-2015, 03:18 PM
Merlin's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 603
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
I'm wondering how they will extract that extra power.
With the current 5.0 V8 people are seeing up to 625 hp / 560 torque (@ 93 octane) with nothing but a tune and a pulley upgrade. In theory the car should be able to do a bit more with other upgrades. I'll probably look into that in a few years once my powertrain warranty is down to 2 years or less.
 

Last edited by Merlin; 06-30-2015 at 03:38 PM.
  #60  
Old 06-30-2015, 06:15 PM
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,032
Received 640 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F-typical
Hmmm...

HorsePower is top speed. Torque is how quickly you get there.

Traction is unlikely to be an issue if all they've done is up the top speed.
Corrected.

Traction is a problem with the V8 RWD units, so it makes sense that they use the AWD system. RWD plus another 50 horsepower would have been stupid.
 


Quick Reply: F-Type SVR Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.